首页|后交叉韧带胫骨撕脱骨折线袢缝合两种外口固定比较

后交叉韧带胫骨撕脱骨折线袢缝合两种外口固定比较

Comparison of two kinds of outlet fixation of loop suture for posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture

扫码查看
[目的]比较扣板与垫圈桩螺钉线袢固定膝关节后交叉韧带(posterior cruciate ligament,PCL)胫骨止点撕脱骨折的临床疗效.[方法]回顾性分析2020年9月-2023年3月在本院行关节镜下线袢固定膝关节PCL胫骨止点撕脱骨折折43例患者的临床资料.根据医患沟通结果,21例采用胫骨隧道前口扣板固定,另外22例采用垫圈桩螺钉固定.比较两组围手术期情况、随访资料和影像资料.[结果]扣板组的手术时间显著少于螺钉组[(51.0±5.2)min vs(58.4±5.2)min,P<0.001],但两组在切口总长度、术中失血量、下地行走时间、住院时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).所有患者均获随访12个月以上,平均(20.2±4.6)个月,两组完全负重活动时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随着术后时间的推移,两组Lysholm评分、IKDC评分均显著增加(P<0.05),而后抽屉试验等级显著减少(P<0.05).术前、术后3个月和末次随访,两组Lysholm评分、IKDC评分和后抽屉试验差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).影像方面,两组骨折复位质量,骨折愈合时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).[结论]关节镜下线袢固定PCL胫骨止点撕脱骨折,使用扣板和垫圈桩螺钉固定均能获得良好的临床效果,但前者手术时间更少.
[Objective]To compare the clinical outcomes of suture loop with button plate(BP)versus post washer screw(PWS)outlet fixations for posterior cruciate ligament(PCL)tibial avulsion fractures.[Methods]A retrospective study was performed on 43 patients who received arthroscopic suture loop fixation of PCL tibial avulsion fractures in our hospital from September 2020 to March 2023.According to the results of doctor-patient communication,21 patients had the suture loop fixed by BP at the anterior outlet of the tibial tunnel,while the other 22 patients were fixed by PWS.The perioperative conditions,follow-up data and imaging data were compared between the two groups.[Results]The BP group consumed significantly less operative time than the PWS group[(51.0±5.2)min vs(58.4±5.2)min,P<0.001],however,there were no significant differences in the total incision length,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative walking time and hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).All patients in both groups were followed up for more than 12 months,with an average of(20.2±4.6)months,and there was no significant difference in the time to resume full weight-bearing activities between the two groups(P>0.05).With the passage of postoperative time,Lysholm score and IKDC score were significantly increased in both groups(P<0.05),while the posterior drawer test grade was significantly declined(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in Lysholm score,IKDC score and post-drawer test between the two groups before surgery,3 months after surgery and the last follow-up(P>0.05).In terms of imaging,there were no significant differences in fracture reduction quality and fracture healing time between the two groups(P>0.05).[Conclusion]In ar-throscopic suture loop fixation of PCL tibial avulsion fractures,both BP and PWS fastenings at the anterior outlet do obtain good clinical consequences,but the former consumed operation time considerably less.

arthroscopyposterior cruciate ligamentavulsion fracturesuture loopbutton platepost washer screw

邓永杰、赵甲军、张振、左坦坦、于杰、樊东晓、刘振辉、郝志全

展开 >

河南大学河南省人民医院骨科,河南郑州 450003

关节镜 后交叉韧带 撕脱骨折 缝线袢 扣板 垫圈桩螺钉

河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目

LHGI20230002LHGI20230076

2024

中国矫形外科杂志
中国残疾人康复协会 中国人民解放军第八十八医院

中国矫形外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.521
ISSN:1005-8478
年,卷(期):2024.32(6)
  • 23