首页|青少年创伤性踝内翻截骨矫正两种固定比较

青少年创伤性踝内翻截骨矫正两种固定比较

Internal fixation versus external counterpart in supramalleolar osteotomy for correction of traumatic ankle varus deformity in adolescents

扫码查看
[目的]比较踝上截骨(supramalleolar osteotomy,SMOT)钢板内固定与SMOT联合Ilizarov架牵伸治疗青少年创伤性踝关节内翻畸形(traumatic ankle joint varus deformity,TAVD)临床疗效.[方法]回顾性分析2015年2月-2022年2月在本院治疗的30例青少年TAVD患者的临床资料.根据医患沟通结果,16例采用SMOT解剖钢板内固定治疗(内固定组),14例采用SMOT联合Ilizarov外固定治疗(外固定组).比较两组围手术期、随访与影像资料.[结果]内固定组在手术时间[(90.0± 11.6)min vs(102.1±9.1)min,P=0.004]、住院时间[(13.3±4.4)d vs(18.5±5.3)d,P=0.007]显著优于外固定组,但前者在术中失血量[(156.9±46.7)ml vs(90.7±14.4)ml,P<0.001]、切口 总长度[(14.5±2.3)cm vs(4.6±0.8)cm,P<0.001]、下地行走时间[(71.7±16.7)d vs(5.6±2.3)d,P<0.001]显著不及后者.随访时间平均(20.6±3.5)个月,术后随时间推移两组VAS、AOFAS评分显著改善(P<0.05).术后6个月,内固定组VAS评分显著优于外固定组[(1.3±1.3)vs(2.6±1.6),P=0.023].影像方面,与术前相比,术后两组TT、TAS 角及 Takakura 分期均显著改善(P<0.05).术后 3 个月,内固定组 TAS 角[(89.8±1.4)° vs(87.6±3.4)°,P=0.036]及 Takaku-ra 分期[0/Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲa/Ⅲb/Ⅳ,(2/11/3/0/0/0)vs(0/7/6/1/0/0),P=0.038]显著优于外固定组(P<0.05).[结论]两种手术固定方式均能有效治疗青少年TAVD.与内固定相比,外固定组具有手术创伤小、出血少、早期负重活动、避免植骨等优势,但存在手术时间长、住院时间长、术中透视多,患者痛苦大等缺点.
[Objective]To compare clinical efficacy of supramalleolar osteotomy(SMOT)with plate internal fixation(IF)versus external fixation(EF)by distracting Ilizarov frame for traumatic ankle varus deformity(TAVD)in adolescents.[Methods]A retrospective analysis was performed on 30 adolescent patients with TAVD treated in our hospital from February 2015 to February 2022.According to doctor-pa-tient communication,16 patients had SMOT with IF of anatomical plate,while other 14 patients were treated with SMOT with EF of distract-ing Ilizarov frame.The perioperative,follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results]The IF group proved signifi-cantly superior to the EF group in terms of operation time[(90.0±11.6)min vs(102.1±9.1)min,P=0.004]and hospital stay[(13.3±4.4)days vs(18.5±5.3)days,P=0.007],whereas significantly inferior to the EF group in terms of intraoperative blood loss[(156.9±46.7)ml vs(90.7± 14.4)ml,P<0.001],total incision length[(14.5±2.3)cm vs(4.6±0.8)cm,P<0.001],and postoperative ambulation time[(71.7±16.7)days vs(5.6±2.3)days,P<0.001].The mean follow-up period lasted for(20.6±3.5)months on an average,and the VAS and AOFAS scores in both groups were significantly improved over time(P<0.05).Morever,the IF proved significantly better than the EF group regarding VAS score 6 months postoperatively[(1.3±1.3)vs(2.6±1.6),P=0.023].Regarding image,talus title(TT),tibial anterior surface angle(TAS),and Takakura scale were significantly improved in both groups after surgery compared with those preoperatively(P<0.05).The IF group was significantly superior to the EF group in terms of TAS[(89.8±1.4)° vs(87.6±3.4)°,P=0.036]and Takakura grade[0/Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲa/Ⅲb/Ⅳ,(2/11/3/0/0/0)vs(0/7/6/1/0/0),P=0.038]3 months after surgery.[Conclusion]Both fixation methods in SMOT are effective in the treatment of juvenile TAVD.Compared with internal fixation,the external fixation has advantages of less surgical trauma,less bleeding,early weight-bearing activities,avoiding bone grafting,etc.,whereas it has disadvantages such as longer operation time,longer hospital stay,more intraoperative fluoroscopy,and greater pain for patients.

adolescentstraumatic ankle joint varus deformitysupramalleolar osteotomyinternal fixationexternal fixation

赵博、王雪、王成伟、海几哲、阿依丁·夏哈太、陀亚楠、艾科热木·吾普尔、帕尔哈提·瓦哈甫

展开 >

新疆医科大学第六附属医院,新疆乌鲁木齐 830002

新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院,新疆乌鲁木齐 830000

新疆大学,新疆乌鲁木齐 830000

青少年 创伤性踝内翻 踝上截骨 内固定 外固定

国家自然科学基金地区科学基金

52165026

2024

中国矫形外科杂志
中国残疾人康复协会 中国人民解放军第八十八医院

中国矫形外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.521
ISSN:1005-8478
年,卷(期):2024.32(7)
  • 25