首页|单侧与双侧椎弓钉固定腰椎后路椎体间融合比较

单侧与双侧椎弓钉固定腰椎后路椎体间融合比较

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixations for lumbar degenerative diseases

扫码查看
[目的]比较单侧和双侧椎弓根钉棒内固定后路腰椎间融合术(posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF)治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效.[方法]回顾性分析2018年8月-2021年6月本院采用PLIF治疗腰椎退变性疾病90例患者的临床资料.根据术前医患沟通结果,48例采用单侧固定,42例采用双侧固定.比较两组围手术期、随访及影像指标.[结果]单侧组在手术时间[(108.3±10.7)min vs(155.8±17.1)min,P<0.05]、术中失血量[(121.2±18.4)ml vs(186.7±18.3)ml,P<0.05]、住院时间[(10.2±3.4)dvs(11.8±3.7)d,P<0.05]均显著少于双侧组,但两组切口长度、术中透视次数、下地行走时间、切口愈合等级的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).随访时间平均(29.1±6.2)个月.两组恢复完全负重活动时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随着时间推移,两组患者腰痛及腿痛VAS评分、ODI及JOA评分均显著改善(P<0.05).术后6个月单侧组的ODI[(25.5±6.2)%vs(28.5±7.4)%,P<0.05]和JOA 评分[(20.5±2.2)vs(19.6±1.8),P<0.05]显著优于双侧组,但两组之间VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),末次随访时,两组上述评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).影像方面,与术前相比,术后6个月及末次随访时,两组椎间隙高度、前凸Cobb角均显著改善(P<0.05),相应时间点,两组间上述影像指标及融合率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).[结论]单侧椎弓根钉棒内固定联合椎间融合术可重建患者脊柱稳定性,恢复患者脊柱功能,可以减少手术损伤.
[Objective]To compare the clinical efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)with unilateral versus bilateral pedi-cle screws fixations for lumbar degenerative diseases.[Methods]A retrospective study was done on 90 patients who received PLIF for lum-bar degenerative diseases in our hospital from August 2018 to June 2021.According to preoperative doctor-patient communication,48 pa-tients underwent unilateral fixation,while other 42 patients underwent bilateral fixations.The perioperative period,follow-up and imaging documents were compared between the two groups.[Results]The unilateral group proved significantly superior to the bilateral group in terms of operation time[(108.3±10.7)min vs(155.8±17.1)min,P<0.05],intraoperative blood loss[(121.2±18.4)ml vs(186.7±18.3)ml,P<0.05]and hospital stay[(10.2±3.4)days vs(11.8±3.7)days,P<0.05],despite statistically insignificant differences in incision length,intraop-erative fluoroscopy times,walking time and incision healing grade between the two groups(P>0.05).The average follow-up time was(29.1± 6.2)months,and there was no a significant difference between the two groups in the time to return to full weight-bearing activities(P>0.05).The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain,as well as ODI and JOA scores significantly improved in both groups over time(P<0.05).At 6 months after surgery,the unilateral group was significantly better than the bilateral group regarding to ODI[(25.5±6.2)%vs(28.5±7.4)%,P<0.05]and JOA scores[(20.5±2.2)vs(19.6±1.8),P<0.05]regardless of insignificant difference in VAS score between the two groups(P>0.05),whereas all abovesaid clinical scores became not statistically significant between the two groups at the last follow-up(P>0.05).Radiological-ly,the vertebral space height and lordotic Cobb angle significantly improved in both groups at 6 months after surgery and at the last follow-up compared with those preoperatively(P<0.05).However,there were no statistically significant differences in the above image indexes and fusion rate between the two groups at any time points correspondingly(P>0.05).[Conclusion]The unilateral pedicle screw fixation PLIF does restore spinal stability,restore spinal function and reduce surgical injury in this study.

lumbar degenerative diseaseposterior lumbar interbody fusionpedicle screw fixationunilateralbilateral

吴陈、龙浩、敖翔、肖杰

展开 >

贵阳市第四人民医院脊柱外科,贵州贵阳 550002

腰椎退变性疾病 后路腰椎间融合术 椎弓根钉固定 单侧 双侧

贵州省卫生健康委项目

gzwkj2022-377

2024

中国矫形外科杂志
中国残疾人康复协会 中国人民解放军第八十八医院

中国矫形外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.521
ISSN:1005-8478
年,卷(期):2024.32(7)
  • 25