首页|精准内镜与微创减压融合治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症

精准内镜与微创减压融合治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症

Precise endoscopic decompression and instrumented fusion versus small-incision counterpart for multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis

扫码查看
[目的]比较单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(unilateral biportal endoscopy transforaminal lumbar interbody fu-sion,UBE-TLIF)和微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合(minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,MIS-TLIF)治疗腰椎管狭窄症(lumbar spinal stenosis,LSS)的临床效果.[方法]回顾性分析2022年1月—2023年8月本院基于神经阻滞定位的微创手术治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症52例患者的临床资料.依据术前医患沟通结果,28例采用UBE-TLIF治疗;24例采用MIS-TLIF治疗.比较两组患者围手术期、随访和影像资料.[结果]两组均顺利完成手术,无死亡及神经损伤等严重并发症发生.UBE-TLIF组在手术时间[(137.7±24.6)min vs(154.8±34.5)min,P=0.042]、术中出血量[(182.5±33.2)ml vs(211.7±57.4)ml,P=0.027]、下床时间[(2.4±0.5)dvs(3.3±0.4)d,P<0.001]、住院时间[(7.3±1.4)d vs(8.4±2.1)d,P=0.042]均显著优于 MIS-TLIF 组.所有患者随访(10.6±1.9)个月,随时间推移,两组的VAS评分、ODI和JOA评分均显著改善(P<0.05);相应时间点,两组间上述指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).影像方面,术后两组硬膜囊面积、责任节段椎间隙高度较术前均显著改善(P<0.05);但相应时间点,两组间影像指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).末次随访时,UBE-TLIF组融合率为89.3%,MIS-TLIF组为91.7%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).[结论]精准模式微创减压固定融合治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症,可显著减少手术创伤和患者经济负担.两种术式均可取得满意临床疗效,相比之下,UBE-TLIF组在手术时间、术中出血量、下床时间、住院时间优于MIS-TLIF组.
[Objective]To compare clinical consequences of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(UBE-TLIF)versus minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)for multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS).[Methods]A retrospective analysis was performed on 52 patients who received accurate minimal invasive surgery based on nerve block loca-tion for multi-level LSS in our hospitals from January 2022 to August 2023.According to preoperative doctor-patient communication,28 pa-tients were treated with UBE-TLIF,while other 24 patients underwent MIS-TLIF.The perioperative,follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results]All patients in both groups had operation performed successfully without serious complications,such as death and nerve injury.The UBE-TLIF group proved significantly superior to the MIS-TLIF group in terms of operative time[(137.7±24.6)min vs(154.8±34.5)min,P=0.042],intraoperative blood loss[(182.5±33.2)ml vs(211.7±57.4)ml,P=0.027],bed rest time[(2.4±0.5)days vs(3.3±0.4)days,P<0.001],hospital stay[(7.3±1.4)days vs(8.4±2.1)days,P=0.042].As time went on during follow-up period lasted for(10.6±1.9)months in a mean,the VAS,ODI and JOA scores in both groups were significantly improved(P<0.05),whereas which were not statisti-cally significant between the two groups at any corresponding time points(P>0.05).As for imaging,the area of internal dural sac and height of intervertebral space at the responsible level were significantly improved in both groups after surgery(P<0.05),while which were not signifi-cantly different between the two groups at any time points accordingly(P>0.05).At the last follow-up,the intervertebral fusion rate was of 89.3%in the UBE-TLIF group,while 91.7%in the MIS-TLIF group,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).[Conclu-sion]The accurate minimally invasive decompression and instrumented fusion in the treatment of multi-level lumbar spinal stenosis do sig-nificantly reduce surgical trauma and patients'economic burden.In contrast,UBE-TLIF group was superior to MIS-TLIF group in terms of operation time,intraoperative blood loss,bed rest and hospital stay.

multi-level lumbar spinal stenosisnerve root blockunilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fu-sionminimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

潘其鹏、孔凡国、付拴虎、王文举、张昌盛、朱卉敏、赵文海、史明

展开 >

河南省洛阳正骨医院(河南省骨科医院)脊柱微创外科,河南郑州 450016

广西中医药大学第一附属医院脊柱外科,广西南宁 530023

长春中医药大学第一附属医院骨伤科,吉林长春 130021

广西中医药大学附属国际壮医医院骨关节与脊柱科,广西南宁 530023

展开 >

多节段腰椎管狭窄症 神经根阻滞术 单侧双通道内镜腰椎间融合术 微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合

河南省中医药科学研究专项课题广西医疗卫生适宜技术开发与推广应用项目

2024ZY3072S2022060

2024

中国矫形外科杂志
中国残疾人康复协会 中国人民解放军第八十八医院

中国矫形外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.521
ISSN:1005-8478
年,卷(期):2024.32(17)