中国矫形外科杂志2024,Vol.32Issue(17) :1582-1587.DOI:10.20184/j.cnki.Issn1005-8478.110288

生物型与骨水泥型单髁膝假体的研究进展

Advances in cemented versus cementless unicondylar knee prostheses

杨宵 张春礼
中国矫形外科杂志2024,Vol.32Issue(17) :1582-1587.DOI:10.20184/j.cnki.Issn1005-8478.110288

生物型与骨水泥型单髁膝假体的研究进展

Advances in cemented versus cementless unicondylar knee prostheses

杨宵 1张春礼2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 海南医学院,海南海口 570100
  • 2. 海南医学院附属琼海市人民医院,海南琼海 571400
  • 折叠

摘要

单髁膝关节置换术(unicompartmental knee arthroplasty,UKA)是治疗局限于单间室膝关节骨性关节炎(knee osteo-arthritis,KOA)常用且有效的方法.随着传统骨水泥型和新兴的生物型UKA假体材料不断发展,这两种假体均展示出显著的临床疗效.本文对骨水泥型和生物型UKA的设计差异、临床疗效、相关并发症以及新技术在UKA中的应用进行综述和比较.

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA)is a commonly used and effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis(KOA)limited to a single compartment.With the continuous development of traditional cemented prostheses,and emerging cementless UKA prosthetic ma-terials,both kinds of prostheses have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy.In this article,we review and compare the design differences,clinical efficacy,associated complications,and use of new technologies in UKA between cemented and cementless UKA to comprehensively assess their clinical efficacy.

关键词

膝骨关节炎/单髁置换/骨水泥假体/生物型假体

Key words

knee osteoarthritis/unicompartmental knee arthroplasty/cemented prosthesis/cementless prosthesis

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国矫形外科杂志
中国残疾人康复协会 中国人民解放军第八十八医院

中国矫形外科杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.521
ISSN:1005-8478
参考文献量41
段落导航相关论文