首页|经皮Kambin三角入路腰椎融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱

经皮Kambin三角入路腰椎融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱

Percutaneous Kambin's triangle approach lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

扫码查看
[目的]对比自研配套器械经皮Kambin三角入路腰椎间融合术(percutaneous Kambin triangle approach lumbar inter-body fusion,PKLIF)与常规微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,MIS-TLIF)治疗退行性腰椎滑脱(degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis,DLS)的临床疗效.[方法]回顾性分析2023年3月-2024年3月本院收治的32例DLS患者的临床资料.根据术前医患沟通结果,15例采用自研配套器械行PKLIF,另外17例行常规入路MIS-TLIF.比较两组临床及影像资料.[结果]所有患者均顺利完成手术,无神经损伤及死亡等严重并发症,平均随访时间(6.0±1.8)个月.PKLIF 术中出血量[(82.7±9.6)ml vs(165.3±25.3)ml,P<0.001]、下地时间[(1.9±0.7)d vs(3.1±0.6)d,P<0.001]、住院时间[(8.3±2.2)d vs(11.7±2.6)d,P<0.001]、术后 1 d 腰痛 VAS 评分[(1.8±0.7)vs(2.9±0.7),P<0.001]、术后 2 周 ODI 评分[(31.2±3.0)vs(40.6±5.8),P<0.001]均显著优于 MIS-TLIF.但是,PKLIF 组透视次数[(17.7±1.7)次 vs(5.1±1.0)次,P<0.001]及手术时间[(134.0±12.4)min vs(115.9±13.7)min,P<0.001]显著大于MIS-TLIF组.[结论]PKLIF治疗DLS可以缓解临床症状,同时具有术中出血量少、下地时间早、住院时间短等优势.相比MIS-TLIF,不足之处是术中透视次数多、手术时间长.
[Objective]To compare clinical outcomes of percutaneous Kambin's triangle approach lumbar interbody fusion(PKLIF)versus minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS).[Methods]A retrospective study was conducted on 32 patients who had DLS treated surgically in our hospital from March 2023 to March 2024.Accord-ing to preoperative doctor-patient communication,15 patients received PKLIF with self-developed instruments,while other 17 patients re-ceived routine MIS-TLIF.Clinical and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results]All patients had the corresponding surgical procedures performed successfully without serious complications such as nerve injury and death,and were followed up in a mean of(6.0±1.8)months.The PKLIF group proved significantly superior to the MIS-TLIF group in terms of intraoperative blood loss[(82.7±9.6)ml vs(165.3±25.3)ml,P<0.001],postoperative ambulation time[(1.9±0.7)days vs(3.1±0.6)days,P<0.001],hospital stay[(8.3±2.2)days vs(11.7±2.6)days,P<0.001],back pain VAS score one day postoperatively[(1.8±0.7)vs(2.9±0.7),P<0.001]and ODI score 2 weeks after op-eration[(31.2±3.0)vs(40.6±5.8),P<0.001].However,the PKLIF group was significantly greater than the MIS-TLIF group regarding intra-operative fluoroscopy times[(17.7±1.7)times vs(5.1±1.0)times,P<0.001]and operation time[(134.0±12.4)min vs(115.9±13.7)min,P<0.001].[Conclusion]PKLIF does relieve clinical symptoms of DLS,with the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss,early ambulation,and shortened hospitalization,whereas disadvantages of more intraoperative fluoroscopy times and longer operation time compared with the MIS-TLIF.

degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesisself-developed instrumentpercutaneous Kambin triangle approach lumbar inter-body fusionminimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

付拴虎、伍亮、钟远鸣、卢大汉、陈勇喜、谷金、覃浩然、宋泉生、覃海飚

展开 >

广西中医药大学第一附属医院脊柱外科,广西南宁 530023

退行性腰椎滑脱 自研配套器械 经皮Kambin三角入路腰椎间融合术 微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术

广西壮族自治区中医药管理局自筹经费科研课题

GXZYA20230068

2024

中国矫形外科杂志
中国残疾人康复协会 中国人民解放军第八十八医院

中国矫形外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.521
ISSN:1005-8478
年,卷(期):2024.32(19)