首页|沥青路面养护技术能耗及碳排放量化分析

沥青路面养护技术能耗及碳排放量化分析

扫码查看
在沥青路面养护工程中,不同养护技术对能耗和碳排放等生态环境的影响存在差异,不同养护技术在不同生命周期阶段能耗与碳排放的特征也有所不同.为了对公路养护决策提供节能减排方面的指导,基于生命周期分析(life cycle analysis,LCA)理论,采用净发热值法和排放因子法分别建立了能耗与碳排放量化模型,对比分析了铣刨重铺、薄层罩面、微表处、同步碎石封层、稀浆封层5种养护技术在不同生命周期阶段的环境影响.结果表明:5种养护技术中,能耗最为密集的阶段均为材料物化阶段,该阶段的能耗占比均超过总能耗的60%;材料运输阶段的能耗值及碳排放量均最小,不到15%;建设施工阶段,混合料拌和环节对环境影响最为集中,其次是摊铺和碾压环节.5种养护技术的年均能耗值排序为:同步碎石封层>微表处>稀浆封层>铣刨重铺>薄层罩面;年均碳排放量排序为:铣刨重铺>同步碎石封层>稀浆封层>薄层罩面>微表处.因此,综合考虑节能减排及服役性能因素,薄层罩面技术表现最为优异.
Quantitative analysis of energy consumption and carbon emission of asphalt pavement maintenance technology
Different maintenance technology for asphalt pavement maintenance engineering exhibit various impacts on the ecological environment such as energy consumption and carbon emission.In addition,the characteristics of energy consumption and carbon emission of different schemes are also different in different life cycle stages.In order to provide guidance on energy saving and emis-sion reduction for road maintenance decision,based on the life cycle analysis(LCA)theory,the net heating value method and emis-sion factor method were used in this paper to establish quantitative models of energy consumption and carbon emission respectively.The environmental impacts of five maintenance technologies,namely milling resurfacing,thin-layer cladding,microsurfacing,syn-chronous gravel sealing and slurry sealing were compared and analyzed at different life stages.The results show that the most energy-intensive stage of the five conservation schemes is the material production stage,whoes energy consumption accounts for more than 60%of the total energy consumption.The energy consumption and carbon emission in the material transportation stage are the small-est,less than 15%.In the construction stage,the environmental impact of mixing is the most concentrated,followed by spreading and rolling.The average annual energy consumption of the five maintenance technologies decreases in the order of synchronous gravel sealing,microsurfacing,slurry sealing,milling resurfacing,and thin-layer cladding.The average annual carbon emission of the five maintenance technologies decreases in the order of milling and resurfacing,synchronous gravel sealing,slurry sealing,thin-layer cladding,and microsurfacing.Therefore,considering the factors of energy saving,emission reduction and service perfor-mance,thin-layer cladding technology performs the best.

environmental impactmaintenancelife cycle analysis(LCA)energy consumptioncarbon emissionquantitative model

郑惠茹、丁湛、栗慧峰、蒋双全、窦妍、栗培龙

展开 >

长安大学水利与环境学院,西安 710054

旱区地下水文与生态效应教育部重点实验室(长安大学),西安 710054

长安大学公路学院,西安 710064

四川公路桥梁建设集团有限公司,成都 610041

展开 >

环境影响 养护 生命周期分析(LCA) 能耗 碳排放 量化模型

陕西省重点研发计划四川省交通运输科技项目四川公路桥梁建设集团有限公司科技研发项目

2022SF-1692022-ZL-13KY2021SRBG-10-11

2024

中国科技论文
教育部科技发展中心

中国科技论文

影响因子:0.466
ISSN:2095-2783
年,卷(期):2024.19(3)
  • 26