Analysis of current status and discussion on models of peer review in geoscience journals under the trend of open science
[Purposes]This study aims to enhance the quality of journal content,expedite the paper publication process,and improve the experience of reviewers and authors.It explores the differences and trends of various peer review models to provide insights into the transformation of peer review models in Chinese scientific journals.[Methods]We conducted case studies and statistical analysis to investigate the current state of peer review mechanisms and the practices of recommending or blocking reviewers in geoscience publications,using 90 meteorology journals as samples.We summarized the peer review models and characteristics of mainstream journals and examined the relationship between journal impact factors and peer review models,as well as the availability of options to recommend or block reviewers.[Findings]Single-blinded peer review remains prevalent in geoscience publications,and the use of open peer review is positively associated with journal impact factors.Concrete strategies are proposed to refine journal review systems and explore specific pathways for the development of peer review mechanisms in Chinese scientific journals.Measures to strengthen the reviewer pool and the construction of geoscience platforms are suggested to facilitate journal development and academic exchange.[Conclusions]New open peer review models such as transparent peer review,collaborative/group peer review,and interactive public peer review offer valuable insights for the development and innovation of peer review in Chinese journals.Concrete attempts and practices can be undertaken to steer the peer review in Chinese scientific journals towards a more comprehensive,fair,efficient,transparent,and open direction.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
