Behavior characteristics of international academic journal publishers in response to open science:A case study of five major international academic journal publishers
[Purposes]This study analyzes the characteristics of how major international academic journal publishers respond to open science.It also explores the development path for open publishing of scientific journals in China.[Methods]Through literature and website research,we comprehensively organized and analyzed the latest advancements and practices of large publishers in response to open science.It included the implementation of open access,the construction of open platforms,open peer review,and the open strategies and measures of five major international academic journal publishers.[Findings]The five major international academic journal publishers have largely completed the transition from traditional publishing to open access.They emphasize the sharing of scientific research data and have comprehensive policies for data submission,storage,and utilization.They actively participate in the formulation and adherence to relevant sharing policies.Additionally,they are continually developing new publishing ecosystems and expanding business types.[Conclusions]Academic journals in China should strengthen intensive development and promote the transition to open access.They should develop standardized guiding principles and focus on the openness and utilization of scientific research data.Furthermore,they should adjust their service and function layouts to expand the types of academic services offered.
Open scienceInternational academic journal publisherBehavior characteristic
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
