中国临床神经外科杂志2024,Vol.29Issue(6) :321-326.DOI:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2024.06.001

麻醉方式和微电极记录对脑深部电刺激术治疗帕金森病效果的影响

Effects of anesthesia method and microelectrode recording on outcomes of deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson's disease

王宇航 吕坤 鄂语乾 曹胜武 赵春生 曹纹平
中国临床神经外科杂志2024,Vol.29Issue(6) :321-326.DOI:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2024.06.001

麻醉方式和微电极记录对脑深部电刺激术治疗帕金森病效果的影响

Effects of anesthesia method and microelectrode recording on outcomes of deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson's disease

王宇航 1吕坤 1鄂语乾 1曹胜武 1赵春生 1曹纹平1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 210000 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院神经外科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨麻醉方式和微电极记录(MER)对脑深部电刺激术(DBS)治疗帕金森病(PD)效果的影响.方法 回顾性分析2016年1月至2020年12月行双侧丘脑底核(STN)-DBS治疗的112例PD的临床资料.根据麻醉方式和使用MER情况分为4组:局部麻醉(LA)+MER组(n=22),LA+非MER组(n=25),全身麻醉(GA)+MER组(n=34),GA+非MER组(n=31).记录术后并发症情况;术后复查CT计算靶点和实际电极尖端坐标,并采用欧氏距离(ED)评估电极植入精度;术后1个月开机,采用UP-DRS-Ⅲ评分评估疗效.结果 术后1个月UPDRS-Ⅲ评分改善率:LA+MER组[(50.04±7.20)%]、GA+MER组[(51.80±8.04)%]和GA+非MER组[(52.23±7.92)%]均明显高于LA+非MER组[(40.37±9.76)%;P<0.05].颅内积气:LA+MER组[(8.17±5.38)ml]和LA+非MER组[(10.27±4.22)ml]明显高于GA+MER组[(4.68±1.25)ml;P<0.05]和GA+非MER组[(4.75±1.08)ml;P<0.05].与其他三组相比,LA+非MER组第一靶点和第二靶点Y轴偏差均明显增大(P<0.05).结论 麻醉方式和MER的选择对STN-DBS治疗PD具有一定的影响.使用MER可纠正GA引起的脑脊液丢失和体位导致的靶点误差,提高植入电极的准确性.

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of anesthesia method and microelectrode recording(MER)on the outcome of deep brain stimulation(DBS)for patients with Parkinson's disease(PD).Methods The clinical data of 112 PD patients who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus(STN)-DBS from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the anesthesia method and the use of MER,they were divided into 4 groups:local anesthesia(LA)+MER group(n=22),LA+non-MER group(n=25),general anesthesia(GA)+MER group(n=34),and GA+non-MER group(n=31).The postoperative complications were recorded;the coordinates of the target and the actual electrode tip were calculated by postoperative CT images,and the Euclidean distance(ED)was used to assess the accuracy of electrode implantation;the stimulator was activated 1 month after the surgery,and the UPDRS-Ⅲscore was used to assess the therapeutic effect.Results The improvement rate of UPDRS-Ⅲscore 1 month after the surgery:the LA+MER group[(50.04±7.20)%],the GA+MER group[(51.80±8.04)%],and the GA+non-MER group[(52.23±7.92)%]were significantly higher than the LA+non-MER group[(40.37±9.76)%;P<0.05].Intracranial pneumatosis:the LA+MER group[(8.17±5.38)ml]and the LA+non-MER group[(10.27±4.22)ml]were significantly higher than the GA+MER group[(4.68±1.25)ml;P<0.05]and the GA+non-MER group[(4.75±1.08)ml;P<0.05].Compared with the other three groups,the Y-axis deviations of the first and second targets in the LA+non-MER group were significantly increased(P<0.05).Conclusions The choice of anesthesia method and MER has a certain influence on the outcomes of STN-DBS for PD patients.The use of MER can correct the target errors caused by cerebrospinal fluid loss and body position under GA and improve the accuracy of electrode implantation.

关键词

帕金森病/脑深部电刺激术/丘脑底核/微电极记录/麻醉方式

Key words

Parkinson's disease/Deep brain stimulation/Subthalamic nucleus/Microelectrode recording/Anesthesia methods

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

江苏省科教能力提升工程(ZDXK202225)

出版年

2024
中国临床神经外科杂志
广州军区武汉总医院

中国临床神经外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.781
ISSN:1009-153X
段落导航相关论文