目的:对空闲时间无聊量表(free time boredom scale,FTBS)进行中文版修订和信效度检验.方法:采用整群抽样的方法在1574名大学生中施测,选取短式无聊倾向量表、流调中心抑郁量表、状态焦虑量表和自评空闲时间无聊条目作为效标.结果:FTBS包含4个维度:缺乏有意义的参与、缺乏精神参与、缺乏身体参与以及时间缓慢,17个条目,累计变异解释率为60.51％.量表4维度的拟合指标良好(x2/df=2.96,RMSEA=0.07,CFI=0.924,TLI=0.904).与无聊倾向量表、流调中心抑郁量表、状态焦虑量表和自评空闲时间无聊的相关系数在0.57～0.73之间(P＜0.01).量表总分以及各维度的内部一致性信度为0.68～0.85,5周后的重测信度为0.42～0.47.结论:空闲时间无聊量表(FTBS)中文版具有良好的信效度,可以用于大学生空闲时间无聊的测量.
Reliability and Validity Test of Free Time Boredom Scale among College Students
Objective:To revise the Chinese version of the free time boredom scale(FTBS)and test its reliability and validity.Methods:A cluster sampling method was used to test 1574 college students.Short boredom proneness scale(SB-PS),the center for epidemiological studies depression scale(CES-D),state anxiety inventory(SAI),and self-assessment free time boredom items were selected as validity indicators.Results:The FTBS contained 4 dimensions:lack of meaning-ful involvement,lack of mental involvement,lack of physical involvement,and slowness of time,with 17 items,and the cu-mulative variance explained was 60.51％;The fit indices for the four-dimensional scale were good(x2/df=2.96,RMSEA=0.07,CFI=0.924,TLI=0.904).The correlation coefficients between the FTBS and the SBPS,CES-D,SAI,and self-assess-ment free time boredom ranged from 0.57 to 0.73(P＜0.01).The internal consistency reliability of the total scale score and each dimension ranged from 0.68 to 0.85,and the test-retest reliability after 5 weeks was within the range of 0.42 to 0.47.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the FTBS demonstrates good reliability and validity and can be used to measure bore-dom in free time among college students.
Free time boredomReliabilityValidityCollege students
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据
