首页|Vitapex糊剂联合氢氧化钙糊剂用于根管治疗患者的临床研究

Vitapex糊剂联合氢氧化钙糊剂用于根管治疗患者的临床研究

扫码查看
目的 观察Vitapex糊剂和氢氧化钙糊剂对根管患者的临床疗效和安全性.方法 纳入接受根管治疗的患者,将接受氢氧化钙糊剂进行一次性注射填充根管治疗的患者作为对照组;另将同期接受Vitapex糊剂和氢氧化钙糊剂进行一次性填充注射根管治疗的患者作为试验组.比较2组患者治疗6个月后的临床疗效、疼痛程度、牙根尖孔直径、根尖闭合时间、检测龈沟液白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-8和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α水平.结果 对照组入组40例,试验入组42例.治疗后,试验组和对照组的总有效率分别为97.62%(41例/42例)和80.00%(32例/40例),在统计学上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗6个月后,试验组患者无痛或轻微疼痛36例、中度疼痛6例、重度疼痛0例;对照组患者无痛或轻微疼痛21例、中度疼痛13例、重度疼痛6例,试验组疼痛程度相较于对照组得到明显改善,疼痛降低(P<0.05).治疗6个月后,试验组的牙根尖孔直径、根尖闭合时间分别为(0.55±0.22)mm和(13.86±2.05)个月,对照组分别为(0.81±0.10)mm和(16.98±4.35)个月,试验组结果均显著优于对照组(均P<0.05).治疗6个月后,试验组龈沟液中IL-1β、IL-8、TNF-α水平分别为(12.50±2.18)、(25.33±6.29)和(2.12±0.32)μg·L-1,对照组为(23.00±6.00)、(36.88±10.14)和(4.08±0.57)μg·L-1,在统计学上差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).试验组的并发症表现为牙龈肿胀2例、牙龈疼痛1例,对照组的并发症表现为牙龈肿胀3例、牙龈疼痛2例、咬合不适1例,在统计学上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 Vitapex糊剂与氢氧化钙糊剂联合应用比单一氢氧化钙糊剂治疗根管的疗效更佳.
Clinical trial of Vitapex paste combined with calcium hydroxide paste in root canal therapy patients
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of Vitapex paste and calcium hydroxide paste in the treatment of root canal patients.Methods Patients who received root canal treatment were included,and the data of patients who received one-time injection of calcium hydroxide pastefor root canal filling treatment were used as the control group;the data of patients who received Vitapex paste and calcium hydroxide paste for one-time filling injection root canal treatment at the same time were included as treatment group.The clinical efficacy,degree of pain,diameter of apical foramen,apical closure time,and detection of interleukin(IL)-1β,IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)in gingival crevicular fluid between two groups of patients after 6 months were compared.Results There were 40 cases in control group and 42 cases in treatment group.After treatment,the total effective rates of treatment group and control group were 97.62%(41 cases/42 cases)and 80.00%(32 cases/40 cases),with significant difference(P<0.05).After 6 months of treatment,36 patients in treatment group had no pain or mild pain,6 patients had moderate pain,and 0 patient had severe pain;there were 21 patients in control group who had no pain or mild pain,13 patients in moderate pain,and 6 patients in severe pain.The pain level in treatment group was significantly improved compared with control group,and the pain was reduced(P<0.05).After 6 months of treatment,the diameter of the apical foramen and the closure time of treatment group were(0.55±0.22)mm and(13.86±2.05)month,which in control group were(0.81±0.10)mm and(16.98±4.35)month,the results of treatment group were significantly better than those in control group(all P<0.05).After 6 months of treatment,IL-1 β,IL-8,TNF-α in the gingival crevicular fluid of treatment group were(12.50±2.18),(25.33±6.29)and(2.12±0.32)µg·L-1,which in control group were(23.00±6.00),(36.88±10.14)and(4.08±0.57)μg·L-1,all with significant difference(all P<0.05).The drug complications in treatment group were 2 cases of gingival swelling,1 case of gingival pain.The control group had 3 cases of gingival swelling,2 cases of gingival pain,1 case of occlusal discomfort,respectively,with no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion The composite application of Vitapex paste and calcium hydroxide paste is more effective in treating root canals than a single calcium silicate bioceramic.

Vitapex pastecalcium hydroxide pasteroot canal therapydegree of painapex closure time

张宏波、王元银

展开 >

安徽医科大学附属六安医院、六安市人民医院口腔科,安徽六安 237005

安徽医科大学附属口腔医院口腔科,安徽合肥 230032

Vitapex糊剂 氢氧化钙糊剂 根管治疗 疼痛程度 根尖闭合时间

2024

中国临床药理学杂志
中国药学会

中国临床药理学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.91
ISSN:1001-6821
年,卷(期):2024.40(7)
  • 13