首页|布地格福治疗AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的临床研究

布地格福治疗AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的临床研究

扫码查看
目的 观察布地格福吸入气雾剂联合无创正压通气(NIPPV)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的临床疗效和安全性.方法 将AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者按队列法分为对照组和试验组.对照组给予NIPPV,每次4 h,tid;试验组在对照组治疗的基础上,给予布地格福吸入气雾剂,每次344 μg,bid,吸入治疗.2组患者均治疗4周.比较2组患者的临床疗效、病情及呼吸情况、肺功能指标[呼气峰值流速(PEF)、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、肺活量(VC)]、血清炎症因子[白细胞介素(IL)-17、IL-6、可溶性细胞间黏附分子(sICAM)-1],并评价安全性.结果 对照组入组38例,试验组入组42例.治疗后,试验组和对照组的总有效率分别为92.86%(39例/42例)和76.32%(29例/38例),在统计学上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后,试验组和对照组的COPD患者自我评估测试问卷评分分别为(9.61±1.86)和(15.23±2.45)分,改良版英国医学研究委员会呼吸问卷评分分别为(1.74±0.31)和(2.43±0.35)分,PEF 分别为(374.63±30.42)和(345.82±26.34)L·min-1,FEV1 分别为(1.59±0.40)和(1.30±0.33)L,VC 分别为(2.64±0.64)和(2.07±0.56)L,血清 IL-17 分别为(67.03±8.21)和(80.79±10.49)μg·L-1,血清 IL-6 分别为(14.86±3.75)和(20.42±4.39)ng·L-1,血清sICAM-1 分别为(118.63±17.72)和(156.42±24.38)ng·mL-1,试验组的上述指标与对照组比较,在统计学上差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).试验组的药物不良反应主要有心悸、头晕、口干,对照组的药物不良反应主要有头晕、口干、恶心.试验组和对照组的总药物不良反应发生率分别为9.52%(4例/42例)和7.89%(3例/38例),在统计学上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 布地格福吸入气雾剂联合NIPPV治疗能有效控制AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的病情,缓解呼吸困难情况,改善肺功能,减轻炎症反应,安全性良好.
Clinical trial of budesonide inhalation aerosol in the treatment of patients with AECOPD complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of budesonide inhalation aerosol combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV)in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD)combined with typeⅡ respiratory failure.Methods According to cohort method,patients with AECOPD and type Ⅱ respiratory failure were divided into treatment group and control group.The control group was given NIPPV(4 h/once,tid),while treatment group was given budesonide inhalation aerosol(344 μg/once,bid)on basis of control group.All patients were treated for 4 weeks.The clinical curative effect,disease severity,respiratory,pulmonary function indexes[peak expiratory flow(PEF),forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1),vital capacity(VC)],serum inflammatory factors[interleukin(IL)-17,IL-6,soluble intercellular adhesion molecule(sICAM)-1]were compared,and evaluated the safety.Results There were 38 cases in control group and 42 cases in treatment group.After treatment,total response rates in treatment group and control group were 92.86%(39 cases/42 cases)and 76.32%(29 cases/38 cases),and the difference was significant(P<0.05).After treatment,scores of COPD assessment test(CAT)in treatment group and control group were(9.61±1.86)and(15.23±2.45)points;scores of modified british medical research council respiratory questionnaire(mMRC)were(1.74±0.31)and(2.43±0.35)points;PEF were(374.63±30.42)and(345.82±26.34)L·min-1;FEV,were(1.59±0.40)and(1.30±0.33)L;VC were(2.64±0.64)and(2.07±0.56)L;levels of serum IL-17 were(67.03±8.21)and(80.79±10.49)μg·L-1;IL-6 levels were(14.86±3.75)and(20.42±4.39)ng·L-1;sICAM-1 levels were(118.63±17.72)and(156.42±24.38)ng·mL-1,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).In treatment group,adverse drug reactions were mainly on palpitation,dizziness and dry mouth,while which were mainly on dizziness,dry mouth and nausea in control group.There was no significant difference in total incidence of adverse drug reactions between treatment group and control group[9.52%(4 cases/42 cases)vs 7.89%(3 cases/38 cases),P>0.05].Conclusion Budesonide inhalation aerosol combined with NNIPPV can effectively control disease severity,relieve dyspnea,improve pulmonary function and alleviate inflammatory response in patients with AECOPD and type Ⅱ respiratory failure,which has good safety.

budesonide inhalation aerosolacute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasetype Ⅱ respiratory failurenon-invasive positive pressure ventilationpulmonary functioninflammatory factor

赵娜、车连靖

展开 >

鸡西市鸡矿医院呼吸内科,黑龙江鸡西 158100

鸡西市人民医院心胸外科,黑龙江鸡西 158100

布地格福吸入气雾剂 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期 Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭 无创正压通气 肺功能 炎症因子

2024

中国临床药理学杂志
中国药学会

中国临床药理学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.91
ISSN:1001-6821
年,卷(期):2024.40(19)