航空器发动机抵押权法律问题探析
Research on Legal Issues of Aircraft Engine Mortgage
佟晨1
作者信息
- 1. 中国民航大学法学院 天津 300300
- 折叠
摘要
实践中往往对随航空器整机购买的发动机单独再次抵押融资或出售,由此可能产生权利冲突.从国际公约、国内法律以及航运融资实践来看,发动机可以单独设定抵押或出售,航空器抵押权可延伸至发动机,但航空器抵押公示效力不及于发动机,发动机适用普通动产公示规则.因此航空器发动机二次抵押后,多个抵押权人的清偿顺位需结合抵押公示情况,根据《民法典》第四百一十四条加以确定.在未经抵押权人同意下转让发动机,航空器发动机抵押权仍具有追及效力,但需要受到一定限制.如受让人构成《民法典》第四百零四条的正常经营活动买受人,或未经抵押登记的发动机受让人主观构成善意则抵押权追及效力将发生阻断.抵押权发生阻断仍可以追究抵押人违约责任.
Abstract
In practice,the aircraft engine,purchased along with the aircraft,is often mortgaged for financing or sale separately,which may cause the conflict of rights.From the perspective of international conventions,domestic laws and aircraft financing practice,the engine can be mortgaged or sold sepa-rately and the mortgage of aircraft can extend to the engine.However,the publicity of mortgage of the aircraft does not extend to the engine.Therefore,after the aircraft engine was mortgaged for the second time,the priority of multiple mortgagee is determined in accordance with the Article 414 of the Civil Code,considering the circumstance of the publicity of mortgage.If the engine is transferred without the consent of the mortgagee,the aircraft engine mortgage will still have the recourse right,but it will be subject to certain restrictions.If the transferee constitutes the buyer of normal business activities under the Article 404 of the Civil Code or the transferee of the engine without mortgage registration constitutes good faith subjectively,the recourse right to mortgage will be blocked,which the mortgagor is still liable for breach of contract.
关键词
航空器发动机/抵押权/二次抵押/追及效力Key words
Aircraft engine/Mortgage/Second mortgage/Recourse right to mortgage引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据