首页|严重创伤患者早期外周血淋巴细胞水平在不良预后中的价值

严重创伤患者早期外周血淋巴细胞水平在不良预后中的价值

扫码查看
目的:探究严重创伤患者不良预后的影响因素,并基于潜在类别分析不同早期外周血淋巴细胞水平患者不良预后影响因素的分布特征.方法:选择2020年9月至2022年9月绵阳市中心医院收治的174例严重创伤患者作为研究对象,根据患者入院后24 h内大量输血或死亡情况,分为预后良好组(136例)和预后不良组(38例).比较两组患者临床资料,多因素Logistic回归分析影响患者不良预后的因素;采用聚类分析和潜在类别分析探讨不同早期外周血淋巴细胞水平患者不良预后影响因素的分布特征.结果:多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)降低、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)延长、D二聚体(D-D)升高、纤维蛋白原(Fib)降低、纤维蛋白原降解产物(FDP)升高、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)升高、淋巴细胞水平降低是影响患者不良预后的因素(P<0.05);聚类分析结果显示,患者不良预后风险呈明显聚集性,可将患者分为不良预后高风险组(淋巴细胞水平≤0.90×109 L-1,72例)和低风险组(淋巴细胞水平>0.90×109 L-1,102例),高风险组不良预后发生率[33.33%(24/72)]明显高于低风险组[13.73%(14/102)](P<0.05);潜在类别分析结果显示,不良预后高风险组和低风险组存在3种潜在类别分布模式,高风险组"低GCS评分患者D-D未升高型分布"比例明显高于低风险组,"危险因素较少型分布"比例明显低于低风险组(P<0.05),两组"低GCS评分患者D-D升高型分布"比例差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:GCS评分降低、APTT延长、D-D升高等均与严重创伤患者不良预后相关,淋巴细胞水平≤0.90×109 L-1患者不良预后风险较高,影响因素主要为"低GCS评分患者D-D未升高型分布".
Value of early peripheral blood lymphocyte level in patients with severe trauma in poor prognosis
Objective:To explore influencing factors of poor prognosis in patients with severe trauma,and to analyze distribu-tion characteristics of adverse prognostic factors in patients with different early peripheral blood lymphocyte levels based on potential categories.Methods:A total of 174 patients with severe trauma treated in Mianyang Central Hospital from September 2020 to Septem-ber 2022 were selected.According to condition of massive blood transfusion or death within 24 hours after admission,patients were divided into:good prognosis group(n=136)and poor prognosis group(n=38).Clinical data of two groups were compared,multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors affecting poor prognosis,and cluster analysis and potential classification were used to analyze distribution characteristics of adverse prognostic factors in patients with different early peripheral blood lymphocyte levels.Results:Multivariate Logistic regression analysis results showed decrease of Glasgow coma scale(GCS),prolongation of acti-vated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),increase of D-dimer(D-D),decrease of fibrinogen(Fib),increase of fibrinogen degrada-tion products(FDP),increase of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and decrease of lymphocyte level were factors influencing poor prognosis(P<0.05).Cluster analysis results showed that risk of poor prognosis was obviously clustered,and patients could be divided into poor prognosis high risk group(lymphocyte level≤0.90×109 L-1,n=72)and low risk group(lymphocyte level>0.90×109 L-1,n=102).Incidence of poor prognosis in high risk group[33.33%(24/72)]was significantly higher than that in low risk group[13.73%(14/102)](P<0.05).Potential category analysis results showed that there were three potential category distribution patterns in poor prognosis high risk group and low risk group.Proportion of"unelevated distribution of D-D in patients with low GCS score"in high risk group was significantly higher than that in low risk group,and proportion of"distribution of less risk factors"in high risk group was sig-nificantly lower than that in low risk group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in proportion of elevated D-D distribution in patients with low GCS score between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Decrease of GCS score,prolongation of APTT and increase of D-D are all associated with poor prognosis in patients with severe trauma.Patients with lymphocyte level≤0.90×109 L-1 have a higher risk of poor prognosis,and main influencing factors are"non-elevated distribution of D-D in patients with low GCS score".

Severe traumaPoor prognosisInfluencing factorsLymphocytePotential category analysis

唐宁健、刘佳雨、吴忠俊、刘纪宁

展开 >

绵阳市中心医院急诊科,绵阳 621000

严重创伤 不良预后 影响因素 淋巴细胞 潜在类别分析

四川省卫生健康委科研项目

19PJ113

2024

中国免疫学杂志
中国免疫学会,吉林省医学期刊社

中国免疫学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.926
ISSN:1000-484X
年,卷(期):2024.40(5)
  • 18