首页|膝关节等速训练对卒中偏瘫患者下肢轻中度肌痉挛的影响

膝关节等速训练对卒中偏瘫患者下肢轻中度肌痉挛的影响

扫码查看
目的 观察膝关节等速训练对卒中偏瘫患者下肢轻中度肌痉挛的影响。方法 前瞻性连续纳入2021年8月至2023年12月苏州市相城人民医院收治的卒中偏瘫患者130例,按收集先后顺序进行编号,应用随机数字表法将所有患者完全随机分组为对照组和等速组,每组65例。两组患者均接受常规康复训练治疗(5 d/周,40min/d),等速组在常规康复训练基础上增加等速肌力训练(5 d/周,20min/d),治疗周期均为6周。分别在治疗前后采用患侧股直肌表面肌电信号的均方根值(RMS)和积分肌电值(iEMG)、改良Ashworth量表(MAS)评分、膝关节屈伸肌的峰力矩值及其比值、Fugl-Meyer评定量表—下肢部分(FMA-LE)评分和10 m步行测试来对比2组患者股直肌表面肌电、下肢肌肉痉挛程度和运动能力。结果 治疗前,2组患者股直肌表面肌电RMS、iEMG、MAS评分、屈伸肌峰力矩值及其比值、FMA-LE评分和步行速度差异均无统计学意义(均P>0。05)。治疗后对照组的股直肌表面肌电RMS、iEMG、MAS评分、膝关节屈伸肌的峰力矩值及其比值、FMA-LE评分和步行速度均较治疗前改善[(12。3±2。2)μV 比(15。5±2。9)μV,(24。8±2。3)μV·s 比(29。2± 3。1)μV·s,(1。34±0。15)分比(1。56±0。25)分,(20。8±3。4)N·m 比(12。3±2。5)N·m、(34。5± 2。3)N·m 比(26。3±3。6)N·m、0。60±0。16 比0。47±0。14、(26。1±2。9)分比(21。3±2。4)分、(0。61± 0。14)m/s比(0。46±0。15)m/s;均P<0。05]。等速组治疗后股直肌表面肌电RMS、iEMG和MAS评分、膝关节屈伸肌的峰力矩值及其比值、FMA-LE评分和步行速度分别为(10。9±1。8)μV、(22。4± 2。1)μV·s、(1。25±0。18)分、(28。7±3。0)N·m、(41。5±2。8)N·m、0。69±0。18、(29。0±2。3)分、(0。69±0。18)m/s,与治疗前[分别为(15。4±2。2)μV、(29。6±3。0)μV·s、(1。58±0。34)分、(12。6±2。3)N·m、(26。1±3。1)N·m、0。48±0。17、(21。5±2。1)分、(0。48±0。17)m/s]和对照组治疗后比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05)。治疗前,等速组轻度痉挛患者和中度痉挛患者与对照组内相应轻度痉挛和中度痉挛患者股直肌表面肌电RMS、iEMG差异均无统计学意义(均P>0。05)。治疗后,等速组内的轻度痉挛患者股直肌表面肌电RMS、iEMG[分别为(10。2±1。0)μV、(20。2±2。0)μV·s]与其治疗前[分别为(14。1±2。3)μV、(28。1±3。2)μV·s]以及对照组治疗后[分别为(11。4±1。7)μV、(23。6±2。5)μV·s]比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05);等速组内的中度痉挛患者股直肌表面肌电RMS、iEMG较治疗前改善[分别为(11。8±1。5)μV比(16。9±2。6)μV,(24。9±2。2)μV·s 比(31。3±3。8)μV·s;均P<0。05],与对照组治疗后[RMS、iEMG 分别为(13。2±2。5)μV、(26。1±2。7)μV·s]比较,RMS 差异有统计学意义(P<0。01),iEMG差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 等速肌力训练对改善下肢伸膝肌轻中度肌痉挛状态有积极效果,且痉挛程度越轻效果越显著。
Effect of knee isokinetic training on mild to moderate muscle spasticity of the lower limbs in stroke patients
Objective To observe the effect of knee isometric training on mild to moderate lower limb muscle spasticity in stroke patients.Methods A total of 130 stroke hemiplegia patients were prospectively included in this study.They were admitted to Xiangcheng People's Hospital of Suzhou City between August 2021 and December 2023 and numbered according to the order of collection.The patients were then randomly assigned to either the control group or the isokinetic group using a random number table.Each group consisted of 65 cases.Both groups underwent conventional rehabilitation training(5 days a week,40 minutes per day),with the isokinetic group receiving additional isokinetic muscle training(5 days a week,20 minutes per day)on top of the conventional rehabilitation training.The treatment period lasted for 6 weeks.The surface electromyographic signals of the rectus femoris muscle on the affected side were analyzed for their root-mean-square(RMS),integral electromyographic(iEMG)values,the modified Ashworth scale(MAS)scores,knee flexors and extensors peak torque and its ratio,the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale-lower extremity(FMA-LE)scores,and the 10 m walk test were used before and after the treatments to compare the surface electromyography of rectus femoris,the degree of muscle spasticity and exercise capacity of the lower extremities of the two groups.Results Prior to treatment,there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the RMS of the rectus femoris muscle,iEMG values,MAS scores,peak torque of the flexor and extensor muscles and their ratio,FMA-LE score,and step speed(all P>0.05).RMS of the rectus femoris muscle,iEMG values,MAS scores,peak torque of the knee flexors and extensors and their ratios,FMA-LE scores,and step speed improved in control group after treatment compared to before treatment([12.3±2.2]μV vs.[15.5± 2.9]μV,[24.8±2.3]μV·s vs.[29.2±3.1]μV·s,[1.34±0.15]points vs.[1.56± 0.25]points,[20.8±3.4]N·m vs.[12.3±2.5]N·m,[34.5±2.3]N·m vs.[26.3±3.6]N·m,0.60±0.16 vs.0.47±0.14,[26.1±2.9]points vs.[21.3±2.4]points,[0.61±0.14]m/s vs.[0.46±0.15]m/s;all P<0.05).Rectus femoris muscle RMS,iEMG values,MAS scores,peak torque of the flexor and extensor muscles and their ratio,FMA-LE scores and step speed after treatment in the isokinetic group were(10.9±1.8)μV,(22.4±2.1)μV·s,(1.25±0.18)points,(28.7±3.0)N·m,(41.5±2.8)N·m,0.69±0.18,(29.0±2.3)points,(0.69±0.18)m/s,compared with pretreatment(respectively[15.4±2.2]μV,[29.6±3.0]μV·s,[1.58±0.34]points,[12.6± 2.3]N·m,[26.1±3.1]N·m,0.48±0.17,[21.5±2.1]points,[0.48±0.17]m/s)and control group after treatment,the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Before treatment,the differences in rectus femoris muscle RMS and iEMG values between patients with mild spasticity and patients with moderate spasticity in the isokinetic group and the corresponding patients with mild spasticity and moderate spasticity within the control group were not statistically significant(all P>0.05).After treatment,the rectus femoris muscle RMS and iEMG values in patients with mild spasticity within the isokinetic group([10.2±1.0]μV and[20.2±2.0]μV·s,respectively)were statistically different from those before treatment([14.1±2.3]μV and[28.1±3.2]μV·s,respectively)and those after treatment in patients with mild spasticity within the control group([11.4±1.7]μV and[23.6±2.5]μV·s respectively;all P<0.05);the rectus femoris muscle RMS and iEMG values in patients with moderate spasticity within the isokinetic group improved compared with the pre-treatment period([11.8±1.5]μV vs.[16.9±2.6)μV,and[24.9±2.2]μV·s vs.[31.3±3.8]μV·s,respectively;both P<0.05),and with the control group after treatment(RMS and iEMG values of[13.2±2.5]μV and[26.1± 2.7]μV·s,respectively),the difference in RMS was statistically significant(P<0.01),and the difference in iEMG values was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Isokinetic muscle training has a positive effect on improving mild-to-moderate muscle spasticity of the lower limb knee extension,and the effect is more significant the lighter the degree of spasticity.

StrokeHemiplegiaIsokinetic muscle trainingMuscle spasticitySurface electromyography

戴亚圆、王晓军、尹杰、董秋平、苏敏

展开 >

215000 苏州大学附属第四医院康复医学科

苏州市相城人民医院康复科

苏州市高新区中医院康复科

卒中 偏瘫 等速肌力训练 肌痉挛 表面肌电

国家重点研发计划主动健康和老龄化科技应对重点专项苏州市临床重点病种诊疗技术专项(2022)&&

2022YFC2009700LCZX202233H201173

2024

中国脑血管病杂志
中国医师协会 首都医科大学宣武医院

中国脑血管病杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.076
ISSN:1672-5921
年,卷(期):2024.21(3)
  • 38