首页|振幅整合脑电图与脑干听觉诱发电位对脑小血管病患者认知及情感障碍的预测价值分析

振幅整合脑电图与脑干听觉诱发电位对脑小血管病患者认知及情感障碍的预测价值分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨振幅整合脑电图(aEEG)和脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)对脑小血管病(CSVD)患者认知障碍、情感障碍的预测价值。方法 回顾性连续纳入2021年1月至2024年2月于苏州大学附属第四医院神经内科就诊的CSVD患者100例作为CSVD组,前瞻性连续纳入2021年1月至2024年2月于苏州大学附属第四医院体检中心行健康体检并与CSVD组年龄、性别匹配的100名健康体检者作为对照组。收集并比较CSVD组与对照组一般资料和临床资料,包括年龄、性别、受教育年限、高血压病、糖尿病、吸烟、饮酒、总胆固醇、三酰甘油、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、半乳糖凝集素3(Gal-3)、胱抑素C、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、血Tau蛋白和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)。应用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)量表和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)量表评估认知功能,MMSE量表评分<24分且MoCA量表评分<25分为存在认知障碍;采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评估是否存在情感障碍,HAMA评分≥14分或HAMD评分≥20分为存在情感障碍;比较CSVD组与对照组上述4项量表评分。收集并比较CSVD组和对照组aEEG、BAEP情况,根据aEEG背景活动连续性、睡眠-觉醒周期情况、下边界振幅水平、窄带宽度情况的综合评分判断aEEG结果,评分0~3分为aEEG异常;观察、记录BAEP波形中的Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波潜伏期和Ⅰ-Ⅲ、Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ-Ⅴ波间期,各波潜伏期>均值+3个标准差和(或)波间期>均值+3个标准差为BAEP异常。根据MMSE量表评分和MoCA量表评分结果将所有CSVD患者分为认知障碍患者和非认知障碍患者,根据HAMA评分和HAMD评分结果将所有CSVD患者分为情感障碍患者和非情感障碍患者。将CSVD患者认知障碍和情感障碍单因素分析中差异有统计学意义且不存在共线性的自变量纳入多因素Logistic回归分析,采用其中有统计学意义的因素构建多因素模型,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分别分析多因素模型对CSVD患者认知障碍和情感障碍的预测价值。结果 (1)CSVD组高血压病患者比例、CRP、Gal-3、胱抑素C、Hcy、Tau蛋白、GFAP及HAMA、HAMD评分均高于对照组(均P<0。05),MMSE、MoCA量表评分均低于对照组(均P<0。05)。CSVD组aEEG的背景活动连续性、睡眠-觉醒周期、下边界振幅以及窄带宽度评分均低于对照组(均P<0。05)。CSVD组的BAEP波潜伏期和波间期各波形参数水平均高于对照组(均P<0。05)。(2)CSVD患者中认知障碍患者52例,非认知障碍患者48例;情感障碍患者36例,非情感障碍患者64例;同时合并认知障碍与情感障碍的患者17例。认知障碍患者年龄、Tau蛋白、GFAP、aEEG异常比例和BAEP异常比例均高于非认知障碍患者(均P<0。05);情感障碍患者年龄、aEEG异常比例和BAEP异常比例均高于非情感障碍患者(均P<0。05)。(3)多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,aEEG异常CSVD患者认知障碍的发生风险是aEEG正常CSVD患者的4。364倍(OR=4。364,95%CI:1。554~12。252,P=0。005);BAEP异常CSVD患者认知障碍的发生风险是BAEP正常CSVD患者的3。218倍(OR=3。218,95%CI:1。218~8。503,P=0。018)。通过 ROC 曲线分析由 aEEG 异常和 BAEP 异常共同构建的多因素模型对CSVD患者认知障碍的预测价值,结果显示,其ROC曲线下面积为0。732,敏感度为76。38%,特异度为82。59%。(4)多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,aEEG异常CSVD患者情感障碍的发生风险是 aEEG 正常 CSVD 患者的 3。203 倍(OR=3。203,95%CI:1。288~7。966,P=0。012),BAEP异常CSVD患者情感障碍的发生风险是BAEP正常CSVD患者的2。553倍(OR=2。553,95%CI:1。011~6。446,P=0。047)。通过ROC曲线分析由aEEG异常和BAEP异常共同构建的多因素模型对CSVD患者情感障碍的预测价值,结果显示,其ROC曲线下面积为0。700,敏感度为74。21%,特异度为83。49%。结论 aEEG和BAEP异常是构建CSVD患者认知和情感障碍预测模型的重要因素,采用aEEG和BAEP联合所构建的多因素模型对CSVD患者认知和情感障碍的预测具有一定价值。
Analysis of the predictive value of amplitude integrated electroencephalogrphy and brainstem auditory evoked potentials for cognitive and affective disorder in patients with cerebral small vessel disease
Objective Exploring the predictive value of amplitude integrated electroencephalography(aEEG)and brainstem auditory evoked potentials(BAEP)in cognitive and affective disorders related to cerebral small vessel disease(CSVD).Methods Retrospectively,100 patients with CSVD who visited the Department of Neurology at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2021 to February 2024 were included in the CSVD group.From January 2021 to February 2024,100 healthy people who underwent physical examination in the Physical Examination Center of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and matched with the CSVD group for age and sex were prospectively included as the control group.Basic and clinical data were collected and compared between the CSVD group and the control group,including age,sex,years of education,hypertension,diabetes,smoking,drinking,total cholesterol,triglycerides,low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C),C-reactive protein(CRP),galactin-3(Gal-3),cystatin C,homocysteine(Hcy),blood Tau protein,and glial fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP).Cognitive function was assessed using the mini-mental state examination(MMSE)and the Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA)scale,with a MMSE score<24 and a MoCA score<25 indicating cognitive impairment.affective disorders were assessed using the Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA)and the Hamilton depression scale(HAMD),with a HAMA score ≥ 14 or a HAMD score ≥20 indicating the presence of affective disorders.The scores of the above four scales were compared between the CSVD group and the control group.aEEG and BAEP data were collected and compared between the CSVD group and the control group.aEEG results were evaluated based on a composite score of background activity stability,sleep-wake cycle,lower boundary amplitude,and narrowband width,with a score of 0-3 indicating aEEG abnormalities.In the BAEP waveform,the Ⅰ,Ⅲ,and Ⅴ waves and the inter-wave intervals of Ⅰ-Ⅲ,Ⅲ-Ⅴ and Ⅰ-Ⅴ were observed and recorded,along with their peak latencies and inter-peak latencies.If the latency of each wave is prolonged>mean+3 standard deviations and/or the interwave period is prolonged>mean+3 standard deviations,it was considered a BAEP abnormality.CSVD patients were divided into cognitive impairment and non-cognitive impairment based on MMSE scale score and MoCA scale score,and all CSVD patients were divided into affective disorder and non-affective disorder based on HAMA score and HAMD score.The independent variables with statistically significant differences and no collinearity in the univariate analysis of cognitive and affective disorders in CSVD patients were included in the multivariate Logistic regression analysis,and the statistically significant factors were used to form the multivariate model.The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to analyze the predictive value of the multi-factor model for CSVD-related cognitive and affective disorders.Results(1)The proportion of hypertension patients,the levels of CRP,Gal-3,cystatin C,Hcy,Tau protein,GFAP,HAMA and HAMD scores in the CSVD group were higher than those in the control group(all P<0.05),and the MMSE and MoCA scale were lower than those in the control group(both P<0.05).The scores of continuity,sleep-wake cycle,lower boundary amplitude and narrow band width of aEEG in the CSVD group were lower than those in the control group(all P<0.05).The peak latency and interpeak latency of BAEP in the CSVD group were higher than those in the control group(all P<0.05).(2)There were 52 patients with cognitive impairment and 48 patients with non-cognitive impairment in CSVD patients.There were 36 patients with affective disorder and 64 patients with non-affective disorder.There were 17patients with both cognitive and affective disorders.The age,Tau protein,GFAP,the proportion of patients with abnormal aEEG and the proportion of patients with abnormal BAEP in patients with cognitive impairment were higher than those in patients without cognitive impairment(all P<0.05).The age of patients with affective disorder,the proportion of patients with abnormal aEEG and the proportion of patients with abnormal BAEP were higher than those of patients without affective disorder(all P<0.05).(3)Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of cognitive impairment in patients with abnormal aEEG CSVD was 4.364 times higher than that in patients with normal aEEG CSVD(OR,4.364,95%CI 1.554-12.252,P=0.005).The risk of cognitive impairment in patients with abnormal BAEP CSVD was 3.218 times higher than that in patients with normal BAEP CSVD(OR,3.218,95%CI 1.218-8.503,P=0.018).The ROC curve was used to analyze the predictive value of the multi-factor model jointly constructed by aEEG abnormalities and BAEP abnormalities for CSVD cognitive impairment.The results showed that the area under the ROC curve was 0.732,the sensitivity was 76.38%,and the specificity was 82.59%.(4)Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of affective disorder in patients with abnormal aEEG CSVD was 3.203 times higher than that in patients with normal aEEG CSVD(OR,3.203,95%CI 1.288-7.966,P=0.012).The risk of affective disorder in patients with abnormal BAEP CSVD was 2.553 times higher than that in patients with normal BAEP CSVD(OR,2.553,95%CI 1.011-6.446,P=0.047).The ROC curve was used to analyze the predictive value of the multi-factor model jointly constructed by aEEG abnormalities and BAEP abnormalities for CSVD affective disorders.The results showed that the area under the ROC curve was 0.700,the sensitivity was 74.21%,and the specificity was 83.49%.Conclusions The abnormality of aEEG and BAEP are important factors in constructing the prediction model of cognitive and affective disorders in CSVD patients.The multi-factor model constructed by aEEG and BAEP has certain value in predicting CSVD-related cognitive and affective disorders.

Cerebral small vascular diseaseEvoked potentials,auditory,brain stemCognitive impairmentAffective disorderBrain electrophysiological monitoring technology

王瑞、韩柯柯、郝永岗、杨丽慧、董万利

展开 >

215000 苏州大学附属第四医院(苏州市独墅湖医院)神经内科

上海市杨浦区定海社区卫生服务中心中医科

大脑小血管疾病 诱发电位,听觉,脑干 认知障碍 情感障碍 脑电生理监测技术

2024

中国脑血管病杂志
中国医师协会 首都医科大学宣武医院

中国脑血管病杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.076
ISSN:1672-5921
年,卷(期):2024.21(12)