首页|基于CRITIC-GRA-TOPSIS法的黄河上游河套平原耕地地力评价

基于CRITIC-GRA-TOPSIS法的黄河上游河套平原耕地地力评价

扫码查看
为更好地了解黄河上游河套平原耕地地力及主要障碍因子,提高耕地质量及促进农业发展,以宁夏西大滩、惠农、兴庆、贺兰、农垦,内蒙古五原、杭锦后7个典型区为研究区域,从立地条件、剖面性状、理化性状、土壤盐渍化、养分状况、土壤管理6个维度,构建黄河上游河套平原耕地地力评价指标体系,利用标准间相关性(CRITIC)方法、灰色关联逼近理想解(GRA-TOPSIS)法、秩和比(RSR)法进行耕地地力评价,并引入障碍度模型对障碍因子进行定量化分析。结果表明:1)研究区域耕地地力综合指数为0。293~0。647。7个典型区耕地地力综合指数分别为0。476~0。627、0。293~0。468、0。418~0。571、0。365~0。501、0。377~0。543、0。414~0。578、0。428~0。647。2)从整体来看,研究区域耕地地力大多处于中等水平。其中,3级和4级耕地面积和为4 273。06 hm2,占总耕地面积的75。16%;1级和6级耕地面积和为229。08 hm2,仅占总耕地面积的4。03%。从分区来看,7个典型区的耕地地力存在一定的差异。其中,西大滩典型区耕地地力最好,平均地力2。43级;惠农典型区耕地地力等级最低,平均地力5。06级;其余5个典型区耕地基本为中等地力。3)7个典型区耕地地力的主要障碍因子不同,包括质地构型、耕层质地、灌溉能力、有效土层厚度、排水能力、地下水埋深、有机质含量、土壤盐渍化程度、有效磷、地形部位、阳离子交换量。在提升耕地地力时,要采取合理高效的措施优先消减主要障碍因子。综上,本研究可为黄河上游河套平原提升耕地地力提供参考,并为其他地区进行耕地地力评价及障碍因子分析提供研究思路。
Evaluation of cultivated land productivity in Hetao Plain of upper reaches of the Yellow River based on CRITIC-GRA-TOPSIS method
In order to better understand the cultivated land productivity and main obstacle factors in Hetao Plain of upper reaches of the Yellow River,and improve the quality of cultivated land and promote agricultural development,seven typical areas of Xidatan,Huinong,Xingqing,Helan,Nongken in Ningxia,Wuyuan and Hangjinhou in Inner Mongolia were taken as the study areas.From six dimensions of site conditions,profile characteristics,soil physical and chemical properties,soil salinization,nutrient status,soil management,the cultivated land productivity evaluation index system in Hetao Plain of upper reaches of the Yellow River was established.The cultivated land productivity evaluation was carried out by using the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation(CRITIC),grey relation approximation combined with the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(GRA-TOPSIS),and the rank-sum ratio(RSR)method.The obstacle degree model was introduced for quantitative analysis of obstacle factors.The results showed as follows:1)The comprehensive indexes of cultivated land productivity in the study areas ranged from 0.293 to 0.647.The comprehensive indexes of cultivated land productivity of the 7 typical areas were 0.476-0.627,0.293-0468,0.418-0.571,0.365-0.501,0.377-0.543,0.414-0.578 and 0.428-0.647,respectively;2)On the whole,the cultivated land productivity in the study areas were mostly at a moderate level.The total cultivated land area of grade 3 and grade 4 was 4 273.06 hm2,accounting for 75.16%of the total cultivated land area.The total cultivated land area of grade 1 and grade 6 was 229.08 hm2,accounting for only 4.03%of the total cultivated land area.From the perspective of each district,there were some differences in the cultivated land productivity in 7 typical areas.The cultivated land productivity of Xidatan typical area was the best,with an average productivity of 2.43.Huinong typical area had the lowest grade of cultivated land productivity,with an average productivity of 5.06.The other 5 typical areas were basically in the medium productivity;3)The main obstacle factors of cultivated land productivity in 7 typical areas were different,including soil texture profile,plough layer texture,irrigation capacity,effective soil layer thickness,drainage capacity,ground-water table,organic matter content,soil salinization degree,available phosphorus,parts of the terrain,cation exchange capacity,which had obvious hindrance to the improvement of cultivated land productivity.Reasonable and efficient measures should be taken to give priority to reducing the main obstacle factors,when improving cultivated land productivity.In conclusion,this study can provide reference for the improvement of cultivated land productivity in Hetao Plain of upper reaches of the Yellow River,and provide research ideas for the evaluation of cultivated land productivity and obstacle factor analysis in other areas.

Hetao Plaincultivated land productivityCRITIC methodGRA-TOPSIS methodRSR methodobstacle factors

张佳佳、苏艳平、杨培岭、王一帆

展开 >

中国农业大学水利与土木工程学院,北京 100083

河套平原 耕地地力 CRITIC法 GRA-TOPSIS法 RSR法 障碍因子

2025

中国农业大学学报
中国农业大学

中国农业大学学报

北大核心
影响因子:0.971
ISSN:1009-508X
年,卷(期):2025.30(2)