首页|抗血小板联合抗凝治疗外周动脉疾病的有效性及安全性:meta分析

抗血小板联合抗凝治疗外周动脉疾病的有效性及安全性:meta分析

扫码查看
目的 总结抗血小板联合抗凝治疗外周动脉疾病的有效性及安全性.方法 通过Cochrane协作网制定的检索策略,检索截至2023年11月1日的国内外数据库中的相关研究文献,并使用Stata 14.0软件以及Cochrane协作网提供的Review Manager 5.4.1软件对结局指标进行meta分析.结果 纳入符合要求的文献共15篇共15 383例患者,其中抗血小板联合抗凝治疗(研究组)7 692例,单行抗血小板治疗(对照组)7 691例.meta分析结果:①症状:研究组的踝肱指数[均数差(mean difference,MD)及95%可信区间(95%confidence interval,95%CI)=0.04(0.02,0.06)]及最小腔内直径[MD(95%CI)=0.48(0.40,0.55)]均大于对照组,而血浆 D-2聚体水平低于对照组[MD(95%CI)=-0.55(-0.57,-0.52)],肢体缺血风险概率低于对照组[风险比(risk ratio,RR)及95%CI=0.67(0.56,0.80)].②血管通畅:研究组的血管通畅概率高于对照组[RR(95%CI)=1.13(1.08,1.17)];不同治疗方案干预后的结果显示,两种抗血小板药物(简称"双抗")联合抗凝的血管通畅率最高[效应量(effect size,ES)及95%CI=0.90(0.86,0.94)],其他措施从高到低依次为单抗(即单用一种抗血小板药物)联合抗凝[ES(95%CI)=0.82(0.76,0.89)]、双抗[ES(95%CI)=0.79(0.72,0.85)]及单抗[ES(95%CI)=0.71(0.54,0.87)];不同抗凝药物种类进行干预后的结果显示,研究组中采用维生素K拮抗剂的血管通畅概率高于对照组[RR(95%CI)=1.15(1.10,1.20)],而研究组中采用Xa抑制剂的血管通畅概率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义[RR(95%CI)=1.04(0.95,1.15)].③出血:研究组出血风险高于对照组[RR(95%CI)=1.55(1.27,1.89)];不同干预措施的出血率在单抗治疗最低[ES(95%CI)=0.02(0.01,0.02)],其他措施的出血率从低到高依次为单抗联合抗凝[ES(95%CI)=0.04(0.03,0.06)]、双抗[ES(95%CI)=0.08(0.06,0.10)]及双抗联合抗凝[ES(95%CI)=0.12(0.06,0.18)];不同抗凝药物种类进行干预后研究组中采用维生素K拮抗剂及采用Xa抑制剂的出血发生概率均高于对照组[RR(95%CI)=1.76(1.28,2.42);RR(95%CI)=1.44(1.12,1.84)].结论 从本meta分析结果看,抗血小板联合抗凝治疗能够有效改善外周动脉疾病患者的症状,提高血管通畅率,但会伴有一定的出血风险,其中以单抗联合抗凝治疗能够取得最大的临床效应和较低的出血风险.
Meta analysis of the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet combined with anticoagulation therapy for peripheral arterial diseases
Objective To summarize the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet combined with anticoagulant therapy for peripheral arterial disease(PAD).Method Using the search strategy developed by Cochrane Collaborative Network,the relevant literature from domestic and foreign databases as of November 1,2023 was searched and a meta-analysis of outcome indicators was conducted using Stata 14.0 software and Review Manager 5.4.1 software provided by Cochrane Collaboration Network.Results A total of 15 eligible literature and 15 383 patients were included,including 7 692 in the antiplatelet combined with anticoagulant therapy group(study group)and 7 691 in the control group(only antiplatelet drug therapy).The meta-analysis results showed that:① Symptoms:The ankle brachial index[mean difference(MD)and 95%confidence interval(95%CI)=0.04(0.02,0.06)]and the minimum lumen diameter[MD(95%CI)=0.48(0.40,0.55)]of the study group were greater than those of the control group;The plasma D-2 dimer level of the study group was lower than that of the control group[MD(95%CI)=-0.55(-0.57,-0.52)],and the probability of the limb ischemia risk of the study group was lower than that of the control group[risk ratio(RR)and 95%CI=0.67(0.56,0.80)].② Vascular patency:The probability of the vascular patency of the study group was higher than that of the control group[RR(95%CI)=1.13(1.08,1.17)];The subgroup analysis results:the vascular patency rate of the two antiplatelet drugs combined with anticoagulation therapy was highest among the different treatment regimens[effect size(ES)and 95%CI=0.90(0.86,0.94)],which of the other measures in descending order was only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulation therapy[ES(95%CI)=0.82(0.76,0.89)],two antiplatelet drugs therapy[ES(95%CI)=0.79(0.72,0.85)],and only one antiplatelet drug therapy[ES(95%CI)=0.71(0.54,0.87)];The probability of the vascular patency using vitamin K antagonists in the study group was higher than that in the control group[RR(95%CI)=1.15(1.10,1.20)],which had no statistical difference using X a inhibitor between the study group and the control group[RR(95%CI)=1.04(0.95,1.15)].③ Bleeding risk:The risk of bleeding of the study group was higher than that of the control group[RR(95%CI)=1.55(1.27,1.89)];The subgroup analysis results:The bleeding rate of the only one antiplatelet drug therapy among the different intervention measures was the lowest[ES(95%CI)=0.02(0.01,0.02)],which of the other measures in ascending order was only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulant therapy[ES(95%CI)=0.04(0.03,0.06)],two antiplatelet drugs therapy[ES(95%CI)=0.08(0.06,0.10)],and two antiplatelet drugs combined with anticoagulant[ES(95%CI)=0.12(0.06,0.18)];The probabilities of the bleeding occurring using the vitamin K antagonists and Xa inhibitor in the study group were higher than those in the control group[RR(95%CI)=1.76(1.28,2.42);RR(95%CI)=1.44(1.12,1.84)].Conclusions From the results of this meta-analysis,it can be seen that the combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy can effectively improve symptoms of patients with PAD,increase vascular patency rate,but it has a certain risk of bleeding.The combination of only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulant therapy might achieve an optimum clinical effect and lower bleeding risk.

antiplatelet therapyanticoagulant therapyperipheral arterial diseasemeta-analysis

曹又文、马江涛、杨睿睿、张建、陈志龙、郑江华

展开 >

川北医学院附属医院血管外科(四川南充 637000)

抗血小板治疗 抗凝治疗 外周动脉疾病 meta分析

市校科技战略合作专项(2022)市校科技战略合作专项(2020)

22SXQT001720SXZRKX0009

2024

中国普外基础与临床杂志
四川大学华西医院

中国普外基础与临床杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.858
ISSN:1007-9424
年,卷(期):2024.31(4)
  • 13