中国全科医学2024,Vol.27Issue(17) :2109-2112.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0526

腺苷负荷与ATP负荷评估冠状动脉微血管疾病中的不良反应分析

Analysis of Adverse Reactions in the Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Disease by Adenosine Load and Adenosine Disodium Triphosphate Load

赵慧 李文豪 程功 陈亮 梁宸源 王依阳 蒋红英 姜瑞嘉
中国全科医学2024,Vol.27Issue(17) :2109-2112.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0526

腺苷负荷与ATP负荷评估冠状动脉微血管疾病中的不良反应分析

Analysis of Adverse Reactions in the Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Disease by Adenosine Load and Adenosine Disodium Triphosphate Load

赵慧 1李文豪 2程功 1陈亮 1梁宸源 1王依阳 1蒋红英 1姜瑞嘉1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 710068 陕西省西安市,陕西省人民医院心血管内科
  • 2. 710068 陕西省西安市,陕西省人民医院介入导管室
  • 折叠

摘要

背景 冠状动脉微血管疾病(CMVD)的诊疗一直是非冠状动脉阻塞性缺血性心脏病的重点.腺苷注射液和ATP注射液是目前测定冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)评估CMVD的临床常用负荷药物,两者有所关联,但具有显著区别.ATP是腺苷的前体,其价格低廉且血管扩张机制与腺苷类似,临床上常代替腺苷,但忽视了其潜在的不良反应.目的 比较腺苷负荷与ATP负荷在评估CMVD过程中的不良反应发生率.方法 选取 2019 年 6 月—2020 年 7 月因典型心绞痛就诊于陕西省人民医院心内科行冠状动脉造影术/冠状动脉CT血管造影术(CTA)明确各支冠状动脉残余狭窄直径<50%的患者 170 例,依据随机数字表法分为腺苷组和ATP组,腺苷组 88 例,ATP组 82 例.腺苷组给予腺苷注射液负荷测定CFR,ATP组采用ATP负荷测定CFR,检测过程中记录患者的血压、心率、扫描时间及不良反应发生情况.结果 与腺苷组相比,ATP组患者胸闷[61.0%(50/82)和 20.4%(18/88)]、头晕[72.0%(59/82)和 31.8%(28/88)]、头痛[68.3%(56/82)和 11.4%(10/88)]、胃肠道不适[13.4%(11/82)和 4.5%(4/88)]、心悸[69.5%(57/82)和5.7%(5/88)]、气促[40.2%(33/82)和2.3%(2/88)]、大汗[28.0%(23/82)和3.4%(3/88)]、潮热[19.5%(16/82)和 2.3%(2/88)]、颜面潮红[13.4%(11/82)和 4.5%(4/88)]的发生率均较高(P<0.05);两组患者神经过敏、耳鸣、咽干、颈部不适的不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 与ATP负荷相比,腺苷负荷测定CFR的不良反应发生率更低.

Abstract

Background The treatment of coronary microvascular disease(CMVD)has always been the focus of non-coronary obstructive ischemic heart disease.Adenosine injection and adenosine disodium triphosphate(ATP)injection,which are common clinical loading drugs to determine coronary flow reserve(CFR)and evaluate CMVD,are related but significantly different.ATP is the precursor of adenosine,with low price and similar vasodilatory mechanism to adenosine,and is often substituted for adenosine in clinical practice,but its potential adverse effects are ignored.Objective To compare the incidence of adverse reactions in the assessment of coronary microvascular disease by adenosine load and adenosine disodium triphosphate load.Methods A total of 170 patients who visited the Department of Cardiology of Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital for typical angina pectoris and underwent coronarography/Coronary CT angiography(CTA)to determine the residual stenosis diameter of each branch coronary artery<50%during June 2019 to July 2020 were selected and divided into the adenosine group(n=88)and ATP group(n=82)based on random number table method.CFR was determined by adenosine injection loading in the adenosine group and by ATP loading in the ATP group.Blood pressure,heart rate,scanning time and adverse reactions of patients were recorded during the detection process.Results The incidence of adverse reactions of chest tightness[61.0%(50/82)vs 20.4%(18/88)],dizziness[72.0%(59/82)vs 31.8%(28/88)],headache[68.3%(56/82)vs 11.4%(10/88)],gastrointestinal discomfort[13.4%(11/82)vs 4.5%(4/88)],palpitation[69.5%(57/82)vs 5.7%(5/88)],shortness of breath[40.2%(33/82)vs 2.3%(2/88)],profuse sweating[28.0%(23/82)vs 3.4%(3/88)],hot flush[19.5%(16/82)vs 2.3%(2/88)]and facial flushing[13.4%(11/82)vs 4.5%(4/88)]in patients in the ATP group were higher than those in the adenosine group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of neuroticism,tinnitus,dry throat and neck discomfort between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with ATP loading,adenosine loading has a lower incidence of adverse reactions determine CFR.

关键词

冠状动脉疾病/腺苷负荷/三磷酸腺苷二钠负荷/冠状动脉血流储备分数/药物相关性副作用和不良反应

Key words

Coronary artery disease/Adenosine load/ATP load/Coronary blood flow reserve fraction/Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2022JQ-891)

陕西省中医药管理局项目(2021-ZZ-ZY003)

陕西省人民医院科技创新领军人才项目(2022LJ-04)

出版年

2024
中国全科医学
中国医院协会

中国全科医学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.04
ISSN:1007-9572
参考文献量19
段落导航相关论文