中医药临床研究类科技成果评价指标体系研究
Research on Evaluation Index System of Scientific and Technological Achievements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research
赖鸿皓 1郭继华 2尤良震 3王伽伯 4刘存志 5刘玥 6刘宝利 7孙鑫 8李慧 9杨忠奇 10季光 11赵林华 12赵晖 13商洪才 3曾芳 14魏戌 15张霄潇 2葛龙16
作者信息
- 1. 730000 甘肃省兰州市,兰州大学公共卫生学院循证社会科学研究中心;730000 甘肃省兰州市,兰州大学公共卫生学院卫生管理与健康发展研究中心
- 2. 100029 北京市,中华中医药学会
- 3. 100700 北京市,北京中医药大学东直门医院中医内科学教育部重点实验室
- 4. 100069 北京市,首都医科大学中医药学院
- 5. 100029 北京市,北京中医药大学针灸推拿学院
- 6. 100091 北京市,中国中医科学院西苑医院心血管病中心
- 7. 100010 北京市,首都医科大学附属北京中医医院科研处
- 8. 610041 四川省成都市,四川大学华西医院中国循证医学中心
- 9. 100700 北京市,中国中医科学院中药研究所;330029 江西省南昌市,中国中医科学院中医药健康产业研究所
- 10. 510405 广东省广州市,广州中医药大学第一附属医院心内科
- 11. 200032 上海市,上海中医药大学脾胃病研究所
- 12. 100053 北京市,中国中医科学院广安门医院内分泌科
- 13. 100700 北京市,中国中医科学院中国中医药循证医学中心
- 14. 610000 四川省成都市,成都中医药大学针灸脑科学研究中心
- 15. 100102 北京市,中国中医科学院望京医院学术发展处
- 16. 730000 甘肃省兰州市,兰州大学公共卫生学院循证社会科学研究中心;730000 甘肃省兰州市,兰州大学公共卫生学院卫生管理与健康发展研究中心;730000 甘肃省兰州市,甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室
- 折叠
摘要
背景 开展好中医药科技成果评价工作对推动中医药创新发展意义重大.既往的中医药科技成果评价常套用笼统的评价方法,造成指标不适用、维度单一等问题,不利于科学、全面地反映成果的多元价值.因此,新时期中医药科技成果评价亟需建立分类、多维度的评价指标体系.目的 遵循我国新时期科技评价要求,针对中医药临床研究类科技成果,建立体现中医药规律、突出中医药优势的科学、分类、可靠、全面的评价指标体系.方法 本研究开始于 2022 年 11 月,完成于 2023 年 5 月.基于对相关文献资料的梳理分析,结合专题小组讨论,初步形成指标框架;通过两轮德尔菲专家咨询,确定评价指标和评价要点;采用层次分析法,计算指标权重.结果 最终确定的中医药临床研究类科技成果评价指标体系包含门槛指标10条,一级指标4条,二级指标17条,评价要点17条.经检验,两轮德尔菲法实施中专家积极系数均为 100%,权威系数分别为 0.94 和 0.93,各级指标Kendall's W一致性检验双侧检验显著性P值均<0.05,表明专家积极程度、权威程度高,专家意见一致性强,咨询结果可靠.结论 本研究围绕中医药临床研究类科技成果评价,构建了一套科学、合理、可靠、易操作的指标体系.指标涵盖范围广,权重区分度高,具有一定中医特色,有利于在全面考虑成果多元价值的同时凸显核心优势.同时,配套建设的评价要点一定程度上增强了指标体系的可操作性,可能为相关评价活动提供潜在参考.
Abstract
Background The effective evaluation of scientific and technological achievements in traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)is of great significance in promoting the innovative development of TCM.Previous evaluations of scientific and technological achievements in TCM often used a generalized evaluation method,leading to problems such as inappropriate indicators and limited dimensions,which is not conducive to reflecting the multiple values of achievements in a scientific and comprehensive way.Consequently,there is an urgent need to establish categorized and multi-dimensional evaluation index system for the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements in TCM in the new period.Objective To establish a scientific,categorized,reliable and comprehensive evaluation index system that reflects the principles of TCM and highlights its unique advantages aiming at the scientific and technological achievements in TCM,in accordance with the contemporary requirements for scientific and technological evaluation in China.Methods This study began in November 2022 and was completed in May 2023.A preliminary index framework was developed through literature review and focus group discussions.Delphi expert consultation was then conducted over two rounds to determine the evaluation indexes and points.The hierarchical analysis method was used to calculate the weight of each index.Results The final evaluation index system of scientific and technological achievements in TCM clinical research comprised 10 threshold indicators,4 primary indicators,17 secondary indicators,and 17 evaluation points.After testing,the positive coefficient of experts in both rounds of Delphi method implementation was 100%,the authority coefficient was 0.94 and 0.93,respectively.The Kendall's W consistency test for each level of indicators yielded two-tailed significance(P<0.05),indicated high levels of expert positivity and authority,strong consistency of expert opinion,and reliable consulting results.Conclusion This study constructs a scientific,reasonable,reliable and easy-to-operate evaluation index system for scientific and technological achievements in TCM clinical research.The indexes cover a wide range with highly differentiated weights and TCM characteristics,which is conducive to highlighting the core strengths while comprehensively considering the multiple value of the results.Additionally,the associated evaluation points,enhancing the operationalization of the index system,may potentially serve as a valuable reference for related evaluation activities.
关键词
中医药标准化/中医药/评价指标/科技成果/分类评价Key words
Zhong yi yao biao zhun hua/Traditional Chinese medicine/Evaluation indexes/Scientific and technological achievements/Categorical evaluation引用本文复制引用
基金项目
中华中医药学会求实项目(2022-QSDXWT-05)
中国科协科学技术创新部科技评估评价专项()
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据