首页|卒中后认知障碍评估工具筛查准确性的Meta分析

卒中后认知障碍评估工具筛查准确性的Meta分析

The Accuracy of Screening for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Assessment Tools:a Meta-analysis

扫码查看
背景 卒中后认知障碍(PSCI)给患者及其家庭带来沉重的负担,早期识别及干预有助于延缓PSCI的发生及进展,因此,使用准确的神经心理评估工具对PSCI进行筛查,对于患者的管理和治疗至关重要.目的 采用Meta分析的方法评价PSCI筛查工具的筛查准确性,为准确筛查PSCI提供依据.方法 检索数据库中国知网、维普网、万方数据知识服务平台、中国生物医学文献服务系统、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library中有关PSCI筛查工具的诊断性试验研究,检索日期为建库至 2022 年 12 月.2 位研究者各自筛选文献、提取数据、评估偏倚风险.采用Stata 17.0 软件分析数据.结果 共纳入 57 篇文献,包含 12 113 例患者,报告了 7 种PSCI筛查工具:美国国立神经疾病和卒中研究院-加拿大卒中网 5-min测验(NINDS-CSN 5-min测验)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、简易精神状况检查量表(MMSE)、老年认知功能减退知情者问卷(IQCODE)、阿登布鲁克认知能力检查-修订版(ACE-R)、认知功能电话问卷修订版(TICS-m)、5分钟蒙特利尔评估(MoCA-5 min).Meta分析结果显示:MoCA筛查PSCI的合并灵敏度及特异度分别为0.84(95%CI=0.80~0.87)和0.74(95%CI=0.67~0.80),合并AUC为0.87(95%CI=0.84~0.90);MMSE筛查PSCI的合并灵敏度及特异度为0.73(95%CI=0.67~0.79)和0.76(95%CI=0.69~0.82),合并AUC为 0.81(95%CI=0.77~0.84);IQCODE筛查PSCI的合并灵敏度及特异度为 0.73(95%CI=0.48~0.89)和 0.95(95%CI=0.75~0.99),合并AUC为 0.91(95%CI=0.88~0.93);NINDS-CSN 5-min测验筛查PSCI的合并灵敏度及特异度为 0.83(95%CI=0.78~0.87)、0.69(95%CI=0.60~0.76),合并AUC为 0.85(95%CI=0.81~0.88);ACE-R筛查PSCI的合并灵敏度及特异度为 0.90(95%CI=0.80~0.95)、0.61(95%CI=0.19~0.91),合并AUC为 0.90(95%CI=0.87~0.92);TICS-m筛查PSCI的合并灵敏度及特异度为 0.84(95%CI=0.75~0.91)、0.67(95%CI=0.61~0.74),合并AUC为0.66(95%CI=0.60~0.71).结论 IQCODE和ACE-R的合并AUC较高,且IQCODE具有较高的合并特异度,ACE-R具有较高的合并灵敏度,故IQCODE和ACE-R是较为准确的PSCI筛查工具.因IQCODE和ACE-R纳入文献数量有限,以上结论仍需多中心、大样本研究予以验证.
Background Post-stroke cognitive impairment(PSCI)brings a heavy burden to patients and their families.An early recognition and intervention can help delay the occurrence and development of PSCI.Therefore,the use of accurate neuropsychological assessment tools to screen for PSCI is essential for the management and treatment of PSCI.Objective To analyze the screening accuracy of assessment tools for PSCI by meta-analysis,thus providing references for an accurate screening of PSCI.Methods Diagnostic trials on screening tools of PSCI published from the establishment of the database to December 2022 were searched in CNKI,VIP,Wanfang Data,SinoMed,PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,Cochrane Library.Two researchers respectively screened literatures,extracted data,and assessed the risk of bias.Stata 17.0 software was used to analyze the data.Results A total of 57 articles were included,involving 7 assessment tools[the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network 5-Minute Battery(NINDS-CSN 5-Minutes),the Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA),the Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE),the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly(IQCODE),the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised(ACE-R),the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status Modified(TICS-m)and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-minute protocol(MoCA-5 min)]to screen 12 113 patients.Meta-analysis results showed that the combined sensitivity and specificity of MoCA in screening PSCI were 0.84(95%CI=0.80-0.87)and 0.74(95%CI=0.67-0.80),respectively,with a combined area under the curve(AUC)of 0.87(95%CI=0.84-0.90).The combined sensitivity and specificity of MMSE in screening PSCI were 0.73(95%CI=0.67-0.79)and 0.76(95%CI=0.69-0.82),respectively,with a combined AUC of 0.81(95%CI=0.77-0.84).The combined sensitivity and specificity of IQCODE in screening PSCI were 0.73(95%CI=0.48-0.89)and 0.95(95%CI=0.75-0.99),respectively,with a combined AUC of 0.91(95%CI=0.88-0.93).The combined sensitivity and specificity of the NINDS-CSN 5-min in screening PSCI were 0.83(95%CI=0.78-0.87)and 0.69(95%CI=0.60-0.76),respectively,with a combined AUC of 0.85(95%CI=0.81-0.88).The combined sensitivity and specificity of the ACE-R in screening PSCI were 0.90(95%CI=0.80-0.95)and 0.61(95%CI=0.19-0.91),respectively,with a combined AUC of 0.90(95%CI=0.87-0.92).The combined sensitivity and specificity of TICS-m in screening PSCI were 0.84(95%CI=0.75-0.91)and 0.67(95%CI=0.61-0.74),respectively,with a combined AUC of 0.66(95%CI=0.60-0.71).Conclusion The combined AUC of IQCODE and ACE-R is larger,and the former as a higher combined specificity and the latter has a higher combined sensitivity.Therefore,IQCODE and ACE-R are optimal assessment tools to accurately screen PSCI.Due to the limited number of literatures reporting the IQCODE and ACE-R in screening PSCI,our conclusions still need to be validated by multicenter and large-sample studies.

Post-stroke cognitive impairmentScreening toolsMeta-analysisDiagnostic test

马玉霞、杨依依、魏晓琴、陈燕茹、秦江霞、袁月、陈雅婧、吴银瓶、韩琳

展开 >

730011 甘肃省兰州市,兰州大学护理学院循证护理中心

730000 甘肃省兰州市,兰州大学第一临床医学院

730030 甘肃省兰州市,兰州大学第二医院肿瘤内科

730000 甘肃省兰州市,甘肃省人民医院护理部

展开 >

卒中后认知障碍 筛查工具 Meta分析 诊断性试验

国家自然科学基金资助项目甘肃省自然科学基金资助项目甘肃省重点研发计划中华医学会基金兰州大学护理学院科研基金兰州市城关区科技局项目兰州市卫生科技项目

7227408722JR5RA21823YFFA000620-374LZUSON2020022022SHFZ00022021003

2024

中国全科医学
中国医院协会

中国全科医学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.04
ISSN:1007-9572
年,卷(期):2024.27(32)