首页|笔迹鉴定标准比较研究

笔迹鉴定标准比较研究

扫码查看
近年来,随着我国法庭科学的迅猛发展,国家更新了一批鉴定标准和技术规范,但由于我国司法体制的独特性,相关标准在适用时依然会造成困惑.立足标准的适用性并运用比较法的思维方式,通过对欧洲和美国笔迹鉴定相关标准分别进行介绍,并进一步与我国笔迹鉴定标准进行比较研究,发现不同标准制定组织所制定的鉴定标准在基本架构、标准内容、结论表述方式等方面均有不同.针对上述比较发现的不同,以小窥大,分析差异的产生原因,同时注意到国内笔迹鉴定标准在内容和体系上亦有不同,对此进行分析并结合我国笔迹鉴定现状提出建议,以期为笔迹鉴定实践及未来标准修订带来启示.
Comparative Study on the Standards for Forensic Examination of Handwriting
With the rapid development of forensic science in China in recent years,a number of identification standards and technical specifications have been updated.However,due to the uniqueness of Chinese Judicial system,the application of relevant standards still causes confusions.From the aspect of applicability,this paper introduced the relevant standards of handwriting identification in Europe and the United States,and compared them with the standards of forensic handwriting identification in China.These identification standards formulated by different organizations are different in terms of basic structure,content,conclusion expression and so on.On the other hand,even domestic handwriting identification standards also varied in content and system.The causes of the differences were analyzed in this paper.Based on the current situation of domestic handwriting identification,suggestions were put forward to provide reference to the forensic practice,as well as the future modification of handwriting identification standards.

forensic examination of handwritingstandardcomparative study

张宇宽、施少培、王雅晨、孙年峰

展开 >

华东政法大学 刑事法学院,上海 200042

司法鉴定科学研究院 上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台司法部司法鉴定重点实验室,上海 200063

笔迹鉴定 标准 比较研究

上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目

2024

中国司法鉴定
司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所

中国司法鉴定

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.485
ISSN:1671-2072
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 32