首页|唐君毅对戴震以训诂释"理"之回应

唐君毅对戴震以训诂释"理"之回应

扫码查看
顺应时代思潮,宋儒发展出一套理学系统用以诠释先秦儒学,此可谓耳目一新,深具意义."当代新儒家"唐君毅先生更曾形容,宋代乃道德理想飞跃之时代.不过,发展至清代,知识分子有了不同的时代感触,认为宋学不能真正承继前学,而应改采字义训诂方式,才能还原先秦之大义.清儒乾嘉学派巨子戴震在其所著《孟子字义疏证》一书中,便认定自己的乾嘉学才是孔孟正统;于著作开篇便探讨"理"字,视先秦之"理"只是文理、肌理、条理等义,同时反对宋儒如朱子"如有物焉"之总持性天理.对此,怀抱着道德理想的唐君毅先生,评论戴震的做法虽具平实之风,却可能遗漏了先秦孔孟儒学之真正精神.本文将以唐先生《原理》一文作为探讨依据,先对其中的历史争议做一描述,继而反思唐先生之说.其中牵涉汉宋之争,将先分析字义训诂之说,而后切入义理讨论.笔者认为,唐先生的说法鞭辟入里,甚是独到,可称之为"新宋学".
Tang Junyi's Response to Dai Zhen's Philological Interpretation of "Reasoning"
In response to the trends of the times,Song Confucianism developed a system of Neo-Confucianism to interpret the pre-Qin Confucianism,which can be described as refreshing and significant.The"Contemporary New Confucian"Mr.Tang Junyi once described the Song Dynasty as an era of moral idealism.However,by the Qing Dynasty,intellectuals had a different sense of the times,believing that Song Confucianism did not truly inherit the previous learning,and that it should adopt a method of interpreting ancient texts to restore the true meaning of the pre-Qin era.Dai Zhen,a prominent figure of the Qian-Jia school of Confucianism,asserted in his work Annotations and Verifications of the Meanings of Mencius that his Qian-Jia school was the orthodox line of Confucius and Mencius.At the beginning of his work,he discussed the meaning of"reasoning",viewing the pre-Qin"reasoning"as only referring to literary reasoning,physical reasoning and organizational reasoning,while also opposing the all-encompassing nature of heavenly principle as expressed by Song Confucianism scholars like Zhu Xi.In response,Mr.Tang Junyi,who held moral ideals,commented that Dai Zhen's approach,while pragmatic,might overlook the true spirit of pre-Qin Confucianism.This article will use Tang's essay"Original Principle"as a basis for exploration,first describing the historical controversies within it and then reflecting on Tang's arguments.Involving the Han-Song controversy,the discussion will first analyze the method of interpreting ancient texts and then delve into the discussion of meanings and principles.The author believes that Tang's arguments are incisive and insightful,deserving to be called"New Song Confucianism."

Dai Zhenreasoningall-encompassingindividualmoral life

蔡家和

展开 >

台湾东海大学哲学系

《鹅湖月刊》社

戴震 总持 分别 道德性命

2024

中国社会科学院大学学报
中国社会科学院研究生院

中国社会科学院大学学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.328
ISSN:2097-1125
年,卷(期):2024.44(1)
  • 48