首页|论我国法官惩戒事由的体系性重构

论我国法官惩戒事由的体系性重构

Systematic Reconstruction of the Grounds for Disciplining Judges in China

扫码查看
我国法官惩戒事由限定了最狭义的范围,虽然起到了限制错案责任追究的积极作用,但存在惩戒事由本身有待进一步厘清、《法官法》有关规定存在内部冲突、隐性事由造成惩戒范围模糊,以及惩戒事由排除职务外行为导致部分惩处结果不平衡、与政务处分事由区分不明导致责任混同等问题.因此,需要体系性重构法官惩戒事由,重申法官惩戒制度的保障功能,慎重追究错案责任;调整法官惩戒事由具体内容,明确中短期目标,并以确立不当行为标准为长期目标;区分惩戒事由的轻重程度,适当引入刚性标准,建立法官惩戒案例指导制度,确保惩戒事由与处罚措施相平衡等.
The grounds for disciplining judges in China are narrowly defined,effectively limiting the accountability for wrongful judgments.However,there are issues such as the need for further clarification of the grounds for discipline,internal conflicts in the provisions of the Judges Law,vague exclusion of implicit grounds for discipline,and a lack of distinction between disciplinary grounds and administrative sanctions,leading to imbalanced disciplinary results and confusion of responsibilities.Therefore,there is a need for a systematic reconstruction of the grounds for disciplining judges emphasizing the protective function of the disciplinary system and holding individuals accountable for wrongful judgments.This involves adjusting the specific content of the grounds for discipline,setting short-term goals,and establishing inappropriate behavior standards as long-term goals.It also requires distinguishing the severity of disciplinary grounds,introducing appropriate rigid standards,and establishing a system for guiding disciplinary cases to ensure a balance between the grounds for discipline and the punitive measures.

judgegrounds for disciplineinappropriate behaviorstandard distinctionseverity distinction

谭中平

展开 >

重庆市高级人民法院研究室

法官 惩戒事由 不当行为 标准区分 程度区分

2024

中国社会科学院大学学报
中国社会科学院研究生院

中国社会科学院大学学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.328
ISSN:2097-1125
年,卷(期):2024.(3)
  • 7