首页|科学理性抑或回归日常?——社会工作实践研究的迷思

科学理性抑或回归日常?——社会工作实践研究的迷思

Scientific Rationality or Lived Experience:The Myth of Social Work Practice Research

扫码查看
自21世纪初期起,实践研究作为一种新的研究理念引起了国内外社会工作界的广泛关注.本文尝试回到西方社会工作专业建立之初,追根溯源地阐释实践研究作为一种实践与研究互构的综融理念的意义建构、现实价值和独特之处,从而为对实践研究感兴趣但因其包罗万象而常感困惑的人们提供一种可能的理解路径.与其他社会科学研究和非实践研究的社会工作研究相比,社会工作实践研究至少具备四个特征,即多元主体合作协商、社会工作专业自省、即时推动实践改变、常人化知识的生产.实践研究试图通过实践和研究的同行并进打破科学理性与 日常经验之间的二元对立,从而有效回应人们在生活世界中遭遇的各种生存和发展困境.
Since the early 21st century,practice research,as a new research concept,has attracted extensive attention from the social work community at home and abroad.Dating back to the establishment of social work profession in the west,this article describes the meaning construction,practical values,and distinct characteristics of practice research which emphasizes the mutual embedment between practice and research.It thus provides those who have a keen interest in practice research but often feel confused due to its inclusiveness with a possible path to understanding practice research.Compared to other social science research and non-practice research,social work practice research has at least four characteristics:collaboration among multiple actors,reflection on social work,immediate change in practice,and production of ethno-knowledge.Social work practice research attempts to break the duality between scientific rationality and lived experience through the parallel development of research and practice,which further responds to various human needs in an effective manner.

social workpractice researchknowledge production

陈海萍

展开 >

北京大学社会学系

社会工作 实践研究 知识生产

国家社会科学基金青年项目

18CSH059

2024

中国社会科学院大学学报
中国社会科学院研究生院

中国社会科学院大学学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.328
ISSN:2097-1125
年,卷(期):2024.44(4)