不同仪器检测对糖化血红蛋白检验结果的影响
Effect of different instruments on glycosylated hemoglobin test
葛雪微 1刘兰明 2秦海萍 3彭海2
作者信息
- 1. 青海省临床检验中心 质控室,青海 西宁 810007
- 2. 青海省人民医院 检验科,青海 西宁 810007
- 3. 青海省交通医院 检验科,青海 西宁 810001
- 折叠
摘要
目的 探讨不同仪器对糖化血红蛋白(glycosylated hemoglobin,GHB)的检测结果 影响,为提高GHB检测准确性提供可靠依据.方法 分别使用ADVIA 1650生化分析仪、HA-8160糖化血红蛋白检测仪.对100例健康人群机体内糖化血红蛋白情况给予准确检测,记录相关数据并给予统计学分析.需注意本次按照糖化血红蛋白检测值进行分组,即6.5％以内为A组、6.5％～10.0％为B组、10.0％以上为C组,对比上述不同分组相应仪器糖化血红蛋白检测值.结果 经分析可知C组两仪器糖化血红蛋白水平对比差异统计学意义,但A组、B组HA-8160检测糖化血红蛋白水平显著高于ADVIA 1650(P<0.05).结论 不同仪器对糖化血红蛋白的检测值具有一定差异,临床医生应根据实际检测情况结合其他指标综合判断病情.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the detection results of GHB with different instruments, and to provide reliable basis for improving the accuracy of GHB detection. Methods ADVIA 1650 biochemical analyzer and HA-8160 glycosylated hemoglobin analyzer were used. The accurate detection of glycosylated hemoglobin in 100 healthy people was carried out, and the related data were recorded and analyzed statistically. Attention should be paid to this group according to glycosylated hemoglobin detection value, that is, within 6.5％ for A group, 6.5％-10.0％ for B group, more than 10％ for C group, and compare the above-mentioned different grouping of corresponding instrument glycosylated hemoglobin detection value. Results The analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups of C instrument glycosylated hemoglobin levels, but the level of glycosylated hemoglobin detected by A in group HA-8160 and group B was significantly higher than that of ADVIA 1650(P<0.05). Conclusion Different instruments have some differences in the detection value of glycosylated hemoglobin. Clinicians should judge the disease comprehensively according to the actual situation and other indicators.
关键词
糖化血红蛋白/检测仪器/应用效果Key words
glycosylated hemoglobin/detection instrument/application effect引用本文复制引用
出版年
2017
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据