首页|两种雾化方法治疗慢性支气管炎的疗效观察

两种雾化方法治疗慢性支气管炎的疗效观察

扫码查看
目的 探析慢性支气管炎临床治疗中采取不同雾化方法治疗的效果.方法 将2015年5月~2017年2月期间收治的慢性支气管炎的患者100例作为研究对象,随机均分成对照组与治疗组,对照组行压缩雾化治疗,治疗组行氧气驱动雾化治疗.经统计学分析比较2组整体疗效.结果 治疗组总有效率、血氧饱和度、排痰量与生活质量指标改善的情况与对照组接近,差异无统计学意义;治疗组临床症状以及体征消失的时间短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 氧气驱动雾化吸入器与压缩雾化吸入机用于慢性支气管炎临床治疗,均具有较确切的效果,两种治疗效果相当,作用显著,但氧气驱动雾化治疗在缓解患者临床症状及体征方面的优于压缩雾化治疗.
Observation of the curative effect of two atomizing methods on chronic bronchitis
Objective To analyze the effects of different nebulization methods in the treatment of chronic bronchitis. Methods During the period of May 2015 to February 2017 of chronic bronchitis 100 patients as studied objects, were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, the former for compressed atomization treatment, the latter for oxygen driven aerosol treatment. Statistical analysis of the overall curative effect of two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate in the treatment group, blood oxygen saturation, improve sputum volume and quality of life index and reference were similar to that of control group, but no statistical significance; clinical symptoms and signs disappeared time shorter than the reference group, have statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Oxygen atomization inhaler and compression atomizing inhalation atomization inhalation machine for chronic bronchitis is the exact effect in the treatment, two treatment effect significantly, but the oxygen driven aerosol treatment in relieving clinical symptoms and signs of patients with the advantages of better than compression atomizing treatment.

chronic bronchitisinhalationtherapy methods

陈正进、范洁

展开 >

浙江嘉兴市南湖区中心医院 内科,浙江 嘉兴 314005

浙江嘉兴市中医院 ICU,浙江 嘉兴 314000

慢性支气管炎 雾化吸入 疗法

2017

中国生化药物杂志
南京生物化学制药研究所,全国生化制药情报中心站,中国生化制药工业协会,中国药品生物制品检定所

中国生化药物杂志

ISSN:1005-1678
年,卷(期):2017.37(10)
  • 5
  • 10