Analysis on the Determination of Producing and Marketing Toxic and Harmful Food Crime from Dual Perspectives of Science and Law
The justification of food safety crime is,to some extent,highly dependent on scientific evidence.The conviction of Producing and Marketing Toxic and Harmful Food Crime shall not only confirm the implementation of producing and marketing behavior,but also include the substantive identification on the toxic attributes of the substance in question.The current judicial trials lack scientific and substantive evidence regarding the toxicity of the substances involved,which challenges the rigor of criminal justice and affects the independence of administrative law enforcement and the stability of its convergence with criminal justice.Meanwhile,there is an inevitable contradiction between the inherent uncertainty of scientific evidence and the pursuit of certainty in criminal trials,and the regulations set by professional regulatory departments on specific substances are influenced by multiple factors.Therefore,this paper discusses the conviction of Producing and Marketing Toxic and Harmful Food Crime from dual perspectives of science and law.It advises that the conviction should include affirmative inferences of health hazard outcomes and that each case should strengthen the practice of scientific health risk assessment,offering references for more effectively regulating related crimes.
producing and marketing toxic and harmful food crimescientific evidencehealth risk assessmentsubstantive toxicitybalance of crime and punishment
万方数据
维普
