首页|飞播马尾松林不同林下植被类型枯落物及土壤水文效应

飞播马尾松林不同林下植被类型枯落物及土壤水文效应

扫码查看
为探明飞播马尾松林不同林下植被类型对枯落物及土壤水文效应的影响,按林下植被优势(分芒萁类、禾本类及灌木类3种类型)设置典型样地,对其枯落物持水性能及土壤蓄水能力进行比较分析.结果表明:3种类型的枯落物现存总蓄积量为0.65 ~3.57t/hm2;其中,灌木类总蓄积量>芒萁类>禾本类.3种类型枯落物自然含水率、最大持水率、最大拦蓄率及有效拦蓄率范围分别为15.50%~29.74%、167.70%~218.25%、139.00% ~199.66%和113.85% ~167.39%;枯落物自然含水量、最大持水量、最大拦蓄量及有效拦蓄量均表现为灌木类>芒萁类>禾本类,除半分解层自然含水量以外,其他持水量指标均表现为灌木类显著高于其他2种类型.0 ~ 20 cm土层的饱和蓄水量、非毛管持水总量以及毛管持水总量均以芒萁类最高,分别为865.95、138.96和726.99 t/hm2;其中,芒萁类在0~20 cm土层,非毛管持水总量显著高于其他2种类型,而0~ 10 cm土层饱和蓄水量显著高于禾本类.综合分析表明:灌木类枯落物的水文效应显著高于禾本类和芒萁类,而芒萁类土壤层水文效应明显优于灌木类和禾本类,这是由于土壤层饱和蓄水量及有效蓄水量分别占林地表层(枯落物层和0 ~ 20 cm土壤层)的99%和94%以上,总体上芒萁类林地表层水文效应明显优于灌木类和禾本类.
Hydrological effects of forest litters and soil in different types of understory vegetation in aerially-seeded Pinus massoniana plantation
[Background] Understory vegetation is an important part of forest ecosystem.It can greatly affect the quality and amount of forest litter and the physical and chemical properties of soil,and further affect the water storage capacity of litter layer and soil layer.Thus,the influence of understory vegetation on the function of water conservation of forest ecosystem cannot be ignored.[Methods] We set 12 typical plots with area of 20m × 20m of each,in which the dominant types of understory vegetation were dicranopteris,graminoid,and shrub respectively in aerially-seeded Pinus massoniana plantation,and collected the data of field investigation and sample determination.Then we analyzed and compared the water-holding capacities of litter and storage capacities of soil in the 3 types.[Results] Total amount of existing litter in three types were about 0.65 t/hm2-3.57 t/hm2,it in shrub type was significantly higher than that in the dicranopteris type and the graminoid type,and it in the dicranopteris type was significantly higher than that in the graminoid type.The natural water content rate,maximum water-holding rate,maximum interception rate,and effective interception rate of litters in three types ranged as 15.50%-29.74%,167.70%-218.25%,139.00%-199.66% and 113.85%-167.39%,respectively.The natural water-holding capacity,maximum water-holding capacity,maximum interception capacity,and effective interception capacity of litters in three types presented as shrub type >dicranopteris type > graminoid type.The indexes of litter water-holding capacity,excluding the natural wate capacity of semi-decomposed layer,in shrub type were significantly higher than those in the other two types.For the hydrological effects of soil,the soil maximum water storage,non-capillary water-holding capacity,and capillary water-holding capacity of 0-20 cm soil depth in the dicranopteris type were the highest among the three types with the capacity of 865.95 t/hm2,138.96 t/hm2,and 726.99 t/hm2,respectively.The results of variance analysis demonstrated that the total non-capillary water-holding capacity of 0-20 cm soil depth in dicranopteris type was significantly higher than those in the other two types,while the soil maximum water storage capacity of 0-10 cm soil depth in dicranopteris type was significantly higher than that in the graminoid type.And as to the rest of indicators,there was no significant difference among the three types.[Conclusions] Comprehensive analysis revealed that the hydrological effects of litter in the shrub type were significantly higher than that in dicranopteris type and the graminoid type,while the hydrological effects of soil in the dicranopteris type were better than those in the shrub type and the graminoid type,due to the soil maximum and effective water storage accounted for over 99% and 94% of the woodland surface (litter layer plus soil depth of 0-20 cm),respectively.Conclusively,the hydrological effects of woodland surface in the dicranopteris type,on the whole,was better than those in the shrub type and the graminoid type.

understory vegetationlittersoilhydrological effectsaerially-seeded Pinus massoniana plantation

赵芳、李雪云、赖国桢、欧阳勋志、郭孝玉

展开 >

九江学院旅游与国土资源学院,332005,江西九江

江西农业大学林学院,330045,南昌

林下植被 枯落物 土壤 水文效应 飞播马尾松林

国家自然科学基金“赣南飞播马尾松林林下植被恢复过程与林木生长、土壤动态变化耦合机理研究”

3136018131160159

2016

中国水土保持科学
中国水土保持学会

中国水土保持科学

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.902
ISSN:1672-3007
年,卷(期):2016.14(4)
  • 20
  • 17