首页|两种汉逊酵母细胞高压匀浆破碎方式的比较

两种汉逊酵母细胞高压匀浆破碎方式的比较

扫码查看
目的 比较分步和循环2种高压匀浆破碎方式对汉逊酵母细胞的破碎效果,以期为今后汉逊酵母细胞工业化规模生产破碎方式的选择提供实验依据.方法 采用分步和循环2种高压匀浆破碎方式对3批汉逊酵母细胞浓缩发酵液进行破碎,取破碎前后样品,置光学显微镜下观察细胞形态,检测宿主蛋白含量、细胞破碎率、蛋白释出度、释出蛋白粒径分布等指标,并进行比较.结果 分步和循环破碎2种高压匀浆破碎方式破碎3批汉逊酵母细胞浓缩发酵液后,完整细胞数量减少,细胞碎片增多,但细胞形态未见明显差异;宿主蛋白含量(平均灰度值分别为115.259和109.125)、细胞破碎率(均值分别为60.29%和58.96%)、蛋白释出度(均值分别为39.55%和37.28%)、释出蛋白粒径分布(分步方式破碎后释出蛋白粒径平均分布在90.41和525.07 nm处,分别占样品蛋白含量的31.37%和68.63%;循环方式破碎后释出蛋白粒径平均分布在109.11和547.37 nm处,分别占样品蛋白含量的29.93%和70.07%)的差异均无统计学意义(F 分别为 1.054、1.159、4.245、8.875,t分别为 1.036 0、0.504 1、0.605 0、0.139 7,P均<0.05).结论 循环和分步2种高压匀浆破碎方式对汉逊酵母细胞的破碎效果相当,但循环破碎方式更简便,且可避免污染风险,更适用于工业化规模生产汉逊酵母细胞的破碎.
Comparison of two high-pressure homogenization methods for disrupting Hansenula polymorpha cells
Objective To compare the disrupting effects of Hansenula polymorpha cells by two kinds of high-pressure homoge-nization methods,step-by-step disrupting and cyclic disrupting,so as to provide experimental basis for the selection of disrupting methods in the industrial large-scale production of Hansenula polymorpha cells in the future.Methods Three batches of concentrated fermentation broth of Hansenula polymorpha cells were disrupted by two high-pressure homogenization methods:step-by-step disrupting and cyclic disrupting.The samples before and after disrupting were taken,and the cell morphology was observed under light microscope.The host protein content,cell disruption rate,protein release rate and particle size distribution of released protein were detected and compared.Results After disrupting three batches of concentrated fermentation broth of Hansenula polymorpha cells by step-by-step disrupting and cyclic disrupting,the number of intact cells decreased and cell fragments increased,while there was no obvious difference in cell morphology.In addition,there was no significant dif-ference in host protein content(average gray value of 115.259 and 109.125 respectively),cell disruption rate(average value of 60.29%and 58.96%respectively),protein release rate(average value of 39.55%and 37.28%respectively),and released protein particle size distribution(average size of 90.41 and 525.07 nm after step-by-step disrupting,accounting for 31.37%and 68.63%of sample protein content;average size of 109.11 and 547.37 nm after cyclic disrupting,accounting for 29.93%and 70.07%of sample protein content,respectively.F=1.054,1.159,4.245 and 8.875,t=1.036 0,0.504 1,0.605 0 and 0.139 7,respectively,each P<0.05).Conclusion Cyclic and step-by-step high-pressure homogenization disrupting methods have the equivalent disrupting effect on Hansenula polymorpha cells,while cyclic disrupting is simpler and can avoid pollution risks,which is more suitable for the disrupting of Hansenula polymorpha cells for industrial large-scale production.

Hansenula polymorphaHigh-pressure homogenization disruptingStep-by-step disruptingCyclic disrupting

王玢、杨林鹏、陈卓涛、周晖国、邵志伟、马素娟、杨千苇、李薇、杨俊杰

展开 >

兰州生物制品研究所有限责任公司甘肃省疫苗工程技术研究中心,甘肃兰州 730046

汉逊酵母 高压均质破碎 分步破碎 循环破碎

甘肃省科技重大专项

17ZD2FA007

2024

中国生物制品学杂志
中华预防医学会,长春生物制品研究所有限责任公司

中国生物制品学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.417
ISSN:1004-5503
年,卷(期):2024.37(10)