首页|我国单采血小板献血者献血不良反应报告发生率Meta分析

我国单采血小板献血者献血不良反应报告发生率Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 通过系统评价的方法分析我国单采血小板献血者献血不良反应的总体情况和主要影响因素,为预防和控制单采血小板献血不良反应及提高献血服务质量提供重要依据。方法 检索CNKI,VIP,Wanfang Data,Pubmed、Embase数据库,收集我国单采血小板献血不良反应横断面研究,观察时间≥6个月,检索时间为1998年至2023年3月,通过2位评价员按照纳入和排除标准独立筛选研究,并进行数据提取和文献质量评价,通过Stata 14。0软件进行Meta分析。结果 最终纳入91篇文献,共计单采血小板献血者585 769名,其中9 102名发生献血不良反应。通过随机效应模型Meta分析显示,总献血不良反应报告发生率为2。65%[95%CI(2。04,3。45),P<0。000 1];亚组分析显示,东部、中部、西部地区输血不良反应报告发生率分别为2。63%[95%CI(1。94,3。58)]、2。32%[95%CI(1。29,4。16)]、4。10%[95%CI(1。90,8。83)],存在地域差异(P<0。000 1)。不同献血不良反应程度报告发生率为:非重度3。62%[95%CI(2。69,4。86)]、重度0。28%[95%CI(0。18,0。45)]。在不同单采仪器之间献血不良反应报告发生率也存在差异(P<0。000 1),为 Amicus 2。73%[95%CI(1。23,6。06)]、CS3000 系列 3。59%[95%CI(2。64,4。89)]、MCS+系列 3。42%[95%CI(2。23,5。25)]、Trima 4。86%[95%CI(3。08,7。66)]、其他组 1。71%[95%CI(0。15,20。02)]。另外,不同性别间单采血小板献血不良反应报告发生率为女性4。80%[95%CI(3。05,7。55)]、男性为1。39%[(95%CI(0。90,2。15)],女性高于男性(P<0。000 1)。≤30岁的单采血小板献血者和>30岁的单采血小板献血者之间献血不良反应分别为2。31%[95%CI(1。34,3。98)]和1。95%[95%CI(1。19,3。20)],无统计学差异(P>0。01)。在不同献血史的献血不良反应报告发生率中,首次为2。16%[(95%CI(1。18,3。95)]、再次为1。12%[(95%CI(0。35,3。58)],首次献血高于再次(P<0。0001)。不同采集治疗量之间单采献血不良反应为单份1。67%[95%CI(0。57,4。89)]、双份3。13%[95%CI(1。11,8。86)],2组间无统计学差异(P>0。01)。结论 有必要统一单采血小板献血不良反应的监测标准,了解和掌握影响单采血小板献血者发生献血不良反应的因素,以提高单采血小板献血服务质量和保障献血者安全。
Reported incidence of adverse reactions in plateletpheresis donors in China:a meta-analysis
Objective To analyze the overall situation and main influencing factors of adverse reactions of blood dona-tion of apheresis platelet donors in China by systematic review,and to provide basis for preventing and controlling adverse reactions of platelet donation and improving the quality of blood donation service.Methods CNKI,VIP,Wanfang Data,Pubmed and Embase databases were searched to collect cross-section studies on adverse reactions of platelet donation in Chi-na.The observation period was ≥ 6 months,and the retrieval time was from 1998 to March 2023.The studies were inde-pendently screened by 2 evaluators according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Data extraction and literature quality e-valuation were carried out,and meta analysis was performed by Stata 14.0 software.Results A total of 91 literature invol-ving 585 769 apheresis platelet donors were included,and 9 102 of them had adverse reactions.Random effect model meta-analysis showed that the total incidence of adverse reactions of platelet donation was 2.65%[95%CI(2.04,3.45),P<0.000 1].Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of platelet donation adverse reactions in the eastern,central and western regions were 2.63%[95%CI(1.94,3.58)],2.32%[95%CI(1.29,4.16)]and 4.10%[95%CI(1.90,8.83)],respectively,with regional differences(P<0.000 1).The incidence of adverse reactions of different degrees was 3.62%[95%CI(2.69,4.86)]for non-severe and 0.28%[95%CI(0.18,0.45)]for severe.The incidence of adverse reactions of blood donation was also different among different apheresis instruments(P<0.000 1):Amicus 2.73%[95%CI(1.23,6.06)],CS3000 series 3.59%[95%CI(2.64,4.89)],MCS+series 3.42%[95%CI(2.23,5.25)],Trima 4.86%[95%CI(3.08,7.66)],other groups 1.71%[95%CI(0.15,20.02)].In addition,the incidence of adverse reactions was 4.80%[95%CI(3.05,7.55)]in females and 1.39%[95%CI(0.90,2.15)]in males,with the incidence in females high-er than that in males(P<0.000 1).The adverse reactions of platelet donors under 30 years old and over 30 years old were 2.31%[95%CI(1.34,3.98)]and 1.95%[95%CI(1.19,3.20)],respectively,and there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.01).The incidence of adverse reactions of blood donation for first-time donors and repeat donors was 2.16%[(95%CI(1.18,3.95)]and 1.12%[(95%CI(0.35,3.58)],with the former higher than the latter(P<0.000 1).The incidence of adverse reactions for single and double platelet collection was 1.67%[95%CI(0.57,4.89)]and 3.13%[95%CI(1.11,8.86)]respectively,with no significant difference(P>0.01).Conclusion It's suggested to unify the mo-nitoring standards of adverse reactions of apheresis platelet donation,understand and master the factors that affect the ad-verse reactions of apheresis platelet donors,so as to improve the quality of apheresis platelet donation service and ensure the safety of donations.

apheresis plateletsmeta-analysisadverse reactions of blood donation

沈龙强、冯慧慧、牛迪、黄霞

展开 >

宁波市中心血站,浙江宁波 315010

重庆市血液中心

中国输血协会血液安全监测专业委员会

单采血小板 Meta分析 献血不良反应

宁波市医学科技计划项目重庆市九龙坡区科技计划项目中国输血协会圣湘输血医学发展基金

2021Y272023-02-037-ZCSBT-SX-2023-01

2024

中国输血杂志
中国输血协会 中国医学科学院输血研究所

中国输血杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.279
ISSN:1004-549X
年,卷(期):2024.37(2)
  • 104