首页|基于肝素酶对比试验对COVID-19重型非ICU患者抗凝治疗出血风险的评估与分析

基于肝素酶对比试验对COVID-19重型非ICU患者抗凝治疗出血风险的评估与分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨肝素酶对比试验(heparinase-modified TEG,hmTEG)在评估COVID-19 重型非ICU患者凝血状态及抗凝治疗监测中的临床应用效果。方法 回顾性分析 2022 年12 月至2023 年5 月于本院确诊感染新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的COVID-19 重型非ICU患者临床资料。按依诺肝素初始剂量不同分为治疗剂量组和预防剂量组,通过比较 2 组患者接受肝素治疗前后,血小板计数、活化部分凝血活酶时间、凝血酶原时间、凝血酶时间、纤维蛋白原、D二聚体、TEG、hmTEG的参数变化,评估COVID-19 重型非ICU患者接受不同剂量肝素抗凝后凝血功能的变化及出血风险。结果 本研究共纳入 179 名COVID-19 重型非ICU患者,其中治疗剂量组 102 名,预防剂量组 77名。接受肝素抗凝前,除年龄(63。4±11。6 vs 59。8±9。1)D二聚体(678 ng/mL vs 621 ng/mL)和MA值[(69。1±10。2)mm vs(65。6±8。5)mm]外,治疗剂量组血小板计数、活化部分凝血活酶时间、凝血酶原时间、凝血酶时间、纤维蛋白原、R值、K时间、α角、凝血指数(CI),与预防剂量组比较均无统计学差异(P>0。05)。接受肝素抗凝后,治疗剂量组与预防剂量组hmTEG检测结果比较,CKR值[(12。2±4。1)min vs(10。2±3。3)min]、CKHR值[(8。1±3。2)min vs(7。1±2。6)min]差异有统计学意义(P<0。05),其余参数组间差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。同时,治疗剂量组与预防剂量组比较,肝素残留或过量比例 15。69%(16/102)vs 5。19%(4/77)显著增加(P<0。05)。但 2 组间VTE事件 2。35%(2/85)vs 2。78%(2/72)、消化道出血 2。35%(2/85)vs 1。39%(1/72)、ICU入住 4。71%(4/85)vs 4。17%(3/72)、死亡事件3。53%(3/85)vs 2。78%(2/72)等发生率无差异(P>0。05)。结论 在当前COVID-19 流行趋势下,COVID-19 重型非ICU患者血栓预防的肝素初始剂量选择需更为谨慎,为减少出血事件的发生,采用hmTEG对患者进行出血风险的个体化评估,更有利于肝素剂量的调整和控制。
Evaluation and analysis of bleeding risk of anticoagulation therapy in severe non-ICU patients with COVID-19 based on heparinase-modified TEG
Objective To investigate the clinical application of heparinase-modified TEG(hmTEG)in evaluating coag-ulation status and monitoring anticoagulant therapy in severe non-ICU patients with COVID-19.Methods The clinical data of severe non-ICU patients with COVID-19 confirmed to be infected with novel coronary disease(SARS-CoV-2)from De-cember 2022 to May 2023 were analyzed retrospectively.The patients were divided into therapeutic dose group and prophy-lactic dose group according to the initial dose of enoxaparin.The changes of platelet count,activated partial thromboplastin time,prothrombin time,thrombin time,fibrinogen,D-dimer,TEG and hmTEG before and after heparin treatment were compared between the two groups,so as to evaluate the changes of coagulation function and bleeding risk of COVID-19 se-vere non-ICU patients after anticoagulation with different doses of heparin.Results A total of 179 severe non-ICU patients with COVID-19 were enrolled in this study,including 102 patients in therapeutic dose group and 77 patients in prophylactic dose group.Before receiving heparin anticoagulation,except for age(63.4±11.6 vs 59.8±9.1)D-dimer(678 ng/mL vs 621 ng/mL)and MA values[(69.1±10.2)mm vs(65.6±8.5)mm],there were no statistical differences in platelet count,acti-vated partial thromboplastin time,prothrombin time,thrombin time,fibrinogen,R value,K time,α angle and coagulation index(CI)between the therapeutic dose group and the prophylactic dose group(P>0.05).After receiving heparin antico-agulation,there were significant differences in CKR value[(12.2±4.1)min vs(10.2±3.3)min]and CKHR value[(8.1±3.2)min vs(7.1±2.6)min]between therapeutic dose group and prophylactic dose group(P<0.05),but no significant differ-ences in other parameters between groups(P>0.05).Meanwhile,the proportion of heparin overdose in the therapeutic dose group was significantly higher than that in the prophylactic dose group 15.69%(16/102)vs 5.19%(4/77)(P<0.05).How-ever,there was no difference in the incidence of VTE events 2.35%(2/85)vs 2.78%(2/72),gastrointestinal bleeding 2.35%(2/85)vs 1.39%(1/72),ICU admission 4.71%(4/85)vs 4.17%(3/72)and death events 3.53%(3/85)vs 2.78%(2/72)between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion In the current epidemic trend of COVID-19,in order to reduce the occurrence of bleeding events,the heparin dose should be selected more carefully in the prevention of thrombosis in se-vere non-ICU patients with COVID-19.The individualized assessment of bleeding risk by hmTEG is more conducive to the adjustment and control of heparin dose.

COVID-19thromboelastography(TEG)heparinase-modified TEG(hmTEG)thromboprophylaxishepa-rin anticoagulation

钟莹、黄显雯、梁春峰

展开 >

南宁市第二人民医院 医学检验科/广西分子免疫研究重点实验室,广西 南宁 530031

广西中医药大学第一附属医院 医务部

广西医科大学第一附属医院 输血科

COVID-19 血栓弹力图 肝素酶对比试验 血栓预防 肝素抗凝

2023年度广西高校中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目

2023KY0085

2024

中国输血杂志
中国输血协会 中国医学科学院输血研究所

中国输血杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.279
ISSN:1004-549X
年,卷(期):2024.37(3)
  • 28