首页|不同方法治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效分析

不同方法治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效分析

扫码查看
目的 观察不同方法治疗桡骨远端骨折患者的效果.方法 45 例桡骨远端骨折患者,随机分为A组、B组、C组,每组 15 例.A组运用手法复位三点外固定架固定治疗,B组运用手法复位四点外固定架固定治疗,C组运用手法复位石膏固定治疗.对比三组治疗后 1 个月数字X线摄影术(DR)影像学各参数、临床疗效;A组和B组耗材费用、手术时间.结果 治疗后 1 个月,A组患者掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨高度分别为(9.5±0.6)°、(21.2±0.4)°、(9.5±0.7)mm,B组患者分别为(9.8±0.4)°、(21.5±0.6)°、(9.6±0.5)mm,C组患者分别为(8.3±0.6)°、(19.1±0.6)°、(9.0±0.6)mm.A组和B组患者掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨高度对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组和B组患者掌倾角、尺偏角大于C组,桡骨高度高于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后 1 个月,A组、B组患者优良率分别为 93.3%、86.7%,高于C组的 53.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组、B组患者优良率对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).A组患者耗材费用(11360±1649)元少于B组的(19600±1573)元,手术时间(41±8)min短于B组的(52±10)min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 手法复位外固定架治疗桡骨远端骨折可以达到良好的治疗效果,且三点外固定架费用更低,手术时间相应缩短,其外科快速康复和骨折的微创治疗理念切合目前背景下的骨折处理方式,提高了社会效益.
Clinical effect analysis of different treatment methods for distal radius fracture
Objective To observe the effect of different treatment methods for distal radius fracture.Methods 45 patients with distal radius fracture were randomly divided into group A,group B and group C,with 15 cases in each group.Group A was treated by manual reduction with three-point external fixator,group B was treated by manual reduction with four-point external fixator,and group C was treated by manual reduction with plaster fixation.The digital tadiography(DR)imaging parameters and clinical efficacy of the three groups were compared 1 month after treatment.The cost of consumables and operation time of group A and group B were compared.Results 1 month after treatment,the palmar tilt,ulnar deviation angle and radial height in group A were(9.5±0.6)°,(21.2±0.4)°and(9.5±0.7)mm,those in group B were(9.8±0.4)°,(21.5±0.6)° and(9.6±0.5)mm,and those in group C were(8.3±0.6)°,(19.1±0.6)° and(9.0±0.6)mm.There was no significant difference in palmar tilt,ulnar deviation angle and radial height between group A and group B(P>0.05).The palmar tilt and ulnar deviation angle of patients in group A and group B were higher than those in group C,and the radius height was higher than that in group C.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).1 month after treatment,the excellent-good rates of patients in group A and group B were 93.3%and 86.7%,which was higher than 53.3%in group C,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in excellent-good rate between group A and group B(P>0.05).The cost of consumables in group A was(11360±1649)yuan,which was less than(19600±1573)yuan in group B;the operation time in group A was(41±8)min,which was shorter than(52±10)min in group B;the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Manual reduction and external fixator in the treatment of distal radius fracture can achieve a good therapeutic effect,and the cost of three-point external fixator is lower,the operation time is correspondingly shortened,and its concept of rapid surgical rehabilitation and minimally invasive treatment of fracture is in line with the current background of fracture management,which improves the social benefits.

Distal radius fractureThree-point external fixatorFour-point external fixator

黄建国、张智渊、王自耿

展开 >

572000 海南省三亚市中医院骨伤科

桡骨远端骨折 三点外固定架 四点外固定架

海南省卫生计生委科研项目

19A200113

2024

中国实用医药
中国康复医学会

中国实用医药

影响因子:0.797
ISSN:1673-7555
年,卷(期):2024.19(9)
  • 12