首页|三种不同腹股沟疝手术修补方案的临床有效性及安全性分析

三种不同腹股沟疝手术修补方案的临床有效性及安全性分析

扫码查看
目的 比较平片无张力疝修补术(Lichtenstein)、疝环充填式疝修补术(Rutkow)、腹膜前修补术(Kugel)三种修补方案治疗腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性.方法 60 例成人腹股沟疝患者,根据修补方案的不同分为Lichtenstein组、Rutkow组、Kugel组,各 20 例.比较三组临床指标(手术时间、术后下床时间、住院时间)、术后早期并发症发生情况、术后不同时间疼痛程度及随访 2 年的术后复发率、异物感.结果 Lichtenstein组、Rutkow组、Kugel组手术时间分别为(65.2±10.3)、(58.6±9.5)、(72.1±11.2)min,术后下床时间分别为(12.8±3.1)、(10.4±2.6)、(14.2±3.5)h,住院时间分别为(5.6±1.2)、(4.9±1.0)、(6.2±1.4)d,三组比较有显著差异(P<0.05).Kugel组术后早期并发症发生率 5.00%略低于Lichtenstein组的 10.00%和Rutkow组的 10.00%,但并无显著差异(P>0.05).术后 1 d,Lichtenstein组、Rutkow组、Kugel组视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分分别为(4.13±1.02)、(4.22±1.33)、(3.91±1.40)分,比较无显著差异(P>0.05).术后 1 个月,Lichtenstein组、Kugel组VAS评分分别为(2.31±0.41)、(2.26±0.57)分,均低于Rutkow组的(3.16±0.92)分;术后 6 个月,Lichtenstein组、Kugel组VAS评分分别为(1.02±0.97)、(0.97±0.82)分,均低于Rutkow组的(1.91±1.55)分,有显著差异(P<0.05).在术后 2 年的随访中,三组复发率比较,无显著差异(P>0.05);但Rutkow组的异物感占比 60.00%明显高于Lichtenstein组的 5.0%和Kugel组的 10.0%,有显著差异(P<0.05).结论 Lichtenstein、Rutkow、Kugel治疗腹股沟疝的疗效及并发症几乎接近,宜根据不同病例采用不同方案.
Clinical effectiveness and safety analysis of three different surgical repairs for inguinal hernia
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair(Lichtenstein),mesh-plug hernia repair(Rutkow)and preperitoneal hernia repair(Kugel)for inguinal hernia.Methods 60 adult patients with inguinal hernia were divided into Lichtenstein group,Rutkow group,and Kugel group according to the different surgical repairs,with 20 cases in each group.The clinical indicators(operation time,postoperative ambulation time,hospitalization time),the occurrence of early postoperative complications,the pain level at different postoperative times,postoperative recurrence rate and foreign body sensation after 2 years of follow-up were compared among the three groups.Results The mean operation time of Lichtenstein group,Rutkow group,and Kugel group were(65.2±10.3),(58.6±9.5)and(72.1±11.2)min,the mean postoperative ambulation time were(12.8±3.1),(10.4±2.6)and(14.2±3.5)h,and the mean hospitalization time were(5.6±1.2),(4.9±1.0)and(6.2±1.4)d,there was a significant difference among the three groups(P<0.05).The incidence of early postoperative complications in Kugel group was 5.00%,which was slightly lower than that in Lichtenstein group(10.00%)and Rutkow group(10.00%),but there was no significant difference(P>0.05).1 day after surgery,VAS scores in Lichtenstein group,Rutkow group and Kugel group were(4.13±1.02),(4.22±1.33)and(3.91±1.40)points,and there was no significant difference(P>0.05).1 month after surgery,the visual analogue scale(VAS)scores in Lichtenstein group and Kugel group were(2.31±0.41)and(2.26±0.57)points,which were lower than Rutkow group's(3.16±0.92)points.6 months after surgery,VAS scores in Lichtenstein group and Kugel group were(1.02±0.97)and(0.97±0.82)points,which were significantly lower than Rutkow group's(1.91±1.55)points(P<0.05).After 2 years of follow-up,there was no significant difference in recurrence rate among the three groups(P>0.05);but the percentage of foreign body sensation(60.00%)in Rutkow group was significantly higher than that in Lichtenstein group(5.0%)and Kugel group(10.0%)(P<0.05).Conclusion The efficacy and complications of Lichtenstein,Rutkow and Kugel are almost similar in the treatment of inguinal hernia,and different regimens should be adopted according to different cases.

Inguinal hernia surgeryLichtenstein tension-free hernia repairMesh-plug hernia repairPreperitoneal hernia repairClinical effectivenessSecurity

王凡

展开 >

511455 广州市南沙区第二人民医院外科

腹股沟疝手术 平片无张力疝修补术 疝环充填式疝修补术 腹膜前修补术 临床有效性 安全性

2024

中国实用医药
中国康复医学会

中国实用医药

影响因子:0.797
ISSN:1673-7555
年,卷(期):2024.19(9)
  • 8