首页|内固定术与人工髋关节置换术治疗老年髋部骨折患者的临床效果比较

内固定术与人工髋关节置换术治疗老年髋部骨折患者的临床效果比较

扫码查看
目的 分析内固定术与人工髋关节置换术治疗老年髋部骨折患者的临床效果.方法 选取 78 例老年髋部骨折患者,根据治疗方法的不同分为置换组(开展人工髋关节置换术,40 例)和内固定组(开展内固定术,38 例).比较两组的围术期临床指标、并发症发生情况、治疗效果、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分和Harris评分.结果 和内固定组比较,置换组患者术后住院时间、负重时间更短,出血量更少(P<0.05).术后 1 d,置换组和内固定组患者的VAS评分比较差异不明显(P>0.05);术后 7 d,和内固定组的(3.13±0.84)分比较,置换组患者的VAS评分(1.31±0.71)分更低(P<0.05).术前,置换组和内固定组患者的Harris评分比较差异不明显(P>0.05);术后 6、12 个月,和内固定组的(70.29±5.29)、(82.04±5.76)分比较,置换组患者的Harris评分(80.19±7.36)、(91.29±8.35)分均更高(P<0.05).和内固定组的 76.32%比较,置换组患者的优良率 92.50%明显更高(P<0.05).和内固定组的 23.68%比较,置换组患者术后并发症发生率 5.00%明显更低(P<0.05).结论 和内固定术比较,老年髋部骨折采用人工髋关节置换术的效果更加明显,可提高关节功能恢复效果,帮助患者缩短康复时间,减少并发症.
Analysis of the clinical effects of internal fixation and artificial hip arthroplasty in the treatment of elderly patients with hip fractures
Objective To analyze the clinical effects of internal fixation and artificial hip arthroplasty in the treatment of elderly patients with hip fractures.Methods 78 elderly patients with hip fractures were selected.According to the different treatment methods,all patients were divided into a replacement group(performing artificial hip arthroplasty)and an internal fixation group(performing internal fixation).Comparison was made on perioperative clinical indicators,occurrence of complications,treatment effect,visual analogue scale(VAS)score and Harris score between the two groups.Results Compared with the internal fixation group,patients in the replacement group had shorter postoperative hospital stay,shorter weight-bearing time,and less bleeding volume(P<0.05).At 1 d postoperatively,the difference in VAS scores between the replacement group and internal fixation group was not significant(P>0.05).Compared with(3.13±0.84)points in the internal fixation group,the VAS score of(1.31±0.71)points in the replacement group was lower at 7 d postoperatively(P<0.05).Preoperatively,the difference in Harris scores between the replacement group and internal fixation group was not significant(P>0.05).Compared with the internal fixation group[(70.29±5.29)and(82.04±5.76)points],the Harris scores in the replacement group[(80.19±7.36)and(91.29±8.35)points]were higher at 6 and 12 months postoperatively(P<0.05).Compared with 76.32%in the internal fixation group,the excellent rate of 92.50%was significantly higher in the replacement group(P<0.05).Compared with 23.68%in the internal fixation group,the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the replacement group(5.00%)(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with internal fixation,artificial hip arthroplasty is more effective for hip fractures in the elderly,which can improve joint function recovery,help patients shorten recovery time,and reduce complications.

Hip fractureInternal fixation surgeryArtificial hip arthroplastyJoint functionElderly patients

史宝国

展开 >

251800 阳信县人民医院骨外科

髋部骨折 内固定术 人工髋关节置换 关节功能 老年患者

2024

中国实用医药
中国康复医学会

中国实用医药

影响因子:0.797
ISSN:1673-7555
年,卷(期):2024.19(19)