首页|复方聚乙二醇电解质散与硫酸镁钠钾口服用浓溶液在肠道准备中的应用效果比较

复方聚乙二醇电解质散与硫酸镁钠钾口服用浓溶液在肠道准备中的应用效果比较

扫码查看
目的 比较复方聚乙二醇电解质散与硫酸镁钠钾口服用浓溶液在肠道准备中的应用效果.方法 56 例行肠道疾病检查患者,采用抽签法分为比照组和试验组,每组 28 例.比照组采用复方聚乙二醇电解质散进行检查前的肠道准备,试验组采用硫酸镁钠钾口服用浓溶液进行检查前的肠道准备.比较两组肠道清洁合格率、不良反应发生率、电解质丢失率、肝肾功能异常情况、满意度.结果 试验组肠道清洁合格率 92.86%高于比照组的 64.29%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).试验组不良反应发生率 10.71%低于比照组的 42.86%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).试验组钠离子、钾离子、氯离子丢失率分别为 7.14%、3.57%、10.71%,低于比照组的 32.14%、25.00%、46.43%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)试验组谷丙转氨酶、谷草转氨酶、血清尿素氮、血肌酐异常率均低于比照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).试验组总满意率 89.29%高于比照组的 60.71%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 复方聚乙二醇电解质散与硫酸镁钠钾口服用浓溶液均可进行肠道清洁,且不会对患者的肝肾功能造成影响,但硫酸镁钠钾口服用浓溶液的肠道清洁效果更显著,安全性更高,能够减少因过度腹泻造成的电解质丢失情况,值得推广应用.
Comparison of the application effect of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder and magnesium sulfate,sodium sulfate and potassium sulfate concentrate oral solution in intestinal preparation
Objective To compare the application effect of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder and magnesium sulfate,sodium sulfate and potassium sulfate concentrate oral solution in intestinal preparation.Methods 56 cases of patients with intestinal disease examination were divided into a comparison group and a test group by lottery method,with 28 cases in each group.The comparison group used compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for intestinal preparation before examination,and the test group used magnesium sulfate,sodium sulfate and potassium sulfate concentrate oral solution for intestinal preparation before examination.The qualified rate of intestinal cleaning,the incidence of adverse reactions,electrolyte loss rate,liver and kidney function abnormalities,and satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results The qualified rate of intestinal cleaning was 92.86%in the test group,which was higher than 64.29%in the comparison group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions was 10.71%in the test group,which was lower than 42.86%in the comparison group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The loss rates of sodium ion,potassium ion and chloride ion were 7.14%,3.57%and 10.71%in the test group,which were lower than 32.14%,25.00%and 46.43%in the comparison group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The abnormal rates of alanine aminotransferase,aspartate aminotransferase,serum urea nitrogen and blood creatinine in the test group were lower than those in the comparison group,but the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The total satisfaction rate of the test group was 89.29%,which was higher than 60.71%of the comparison group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Both compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder and magnesium sulfate,sodium sulfate and potassium sulfate concentrate oral solution can clean the intestine,and will not affect the liver and kidney function of patients.However,magnesium sulfate,sodium sulfate and potassium sulfate concentrate oral solution has more significant intestinal cleaning effect and higher safety,and can reduce the electrolyte loss caused by excessive diarrhea,which is worthy of promotion and application.

Compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powderMagnesium sulfate,sodium sulfate and potassium sulfate concentrate oral solutionIntestinal cleaning

孙士博

展开 >

276400 沂水县人民医院胃肠肝胆外科

复方聚乙二醇电解质散 硫酸镁钠钾口服用浓溶液 肠道清洁

2024

中国实用医药
中国康复医学会

中国实用医药

影响因子:0.797
ISSN:1673-7555
年,卷(期):2024.19(19)