首页|基于影像组学-机器学习鉴别自身免疫性胰腺炎与胰腺癌的可行性研究

基于影像组学-机器学习鉴别自身免疫性胰腺炎与胰腺癌的可行性研究

扫码查看
目的 研究影像组学-机器学习方法在自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)和胰腺癌(PC)鉴别中的价值.方法 选择确诊的60例AIP患者及60例PC患者作为研究对象,所有患者均进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查,并于肘静脉注射对比剂钆喷酸葡胺注射液后进行增强扫描,包括动脉期、门静脉期和延迟期的扫描.根据7:3的随机比例要求,将患者分为训练组(84例)和验证组(36例),建立Logistic回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)以及极端梯度增强(XGBoost)5种机器学习方法模型,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)、准确率、精确率、敏感度、特异度、F1值和布里尔分数评估各模型的性能.结果 在动脉期、门静脉期、延迟期3个阶段的组学模型中,训练组与验证组门静脉期的AUC、敏感度、准确率均高于动脉期和延迟期,但各期中动脉期特异度、约登指数最高.在LR、SVM、DT、RF、XGBoost 5种机器学习模型中,训练组中RF的AUC(0.924)、准确率(82.5%)、特异度(76.4%)、F1值(0.806)最高,布里尔分数最低(0.46);DT的精确率(88.6%)最高.验证组中,XGBoost的AUC(0.764)、准确率(76.4%)、精确率(82.2%)、特异度(70.5%)、F1值(0.712)最高,DT的布里尔分数最低(0.21).结论 在AIP与PC鉴别中,MRI能够从两者的征象表现和信号等做出较为准确的鉴别诊断,但对于较为浅显的征象和信号却较难分别,而通过影像组学模型则能够更好地反映两种疾病的区别,且在门静脉期更为显著,有助于提高两种疾病的鉴别诊断效果.
Feasibility study of differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer based on imaging omics-machine learning
Objective To study the value of imaging omics-machine learning in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods This study selected 60 patients with AIP and 60 patients with PC as the research subjects. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all patients,and enhanced scans were performed after intravenous injection of the contrast agent gadopentetate dimeglumine injection into the elbow,including arterial,portal,and delayed phase scanning. Then,according to the requirement of 7:3 random ratio,the cases were divided into the training group (84 cases) and the verification group (36 cases),and 5 machine learning models using Logistic regression (LR),support vector machine (SVM),decision tree (DT),random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were established. Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC),accuracy,precision,sensitivity,specificity,F1 value and Brier score were used to evaluate the performance of each model. Results Among the 3 stages of arterial phase,portal phase and delayed phase,the training group and verification group had the highest AUC,sensitivity and accuracy than those of arterial phase and delayed phase,but the specificity and Youden's index of arterial phase was the highest. Among the LR,SVM,DT,RF and XGBoost machine learning models,the AUC (0.924),accuracy (82.5%),specificity (76.4%) and F1 value (0.806) of RF in the training group were the highest,and the Brier score was the lowest (0.46);DT has the highest accuracy (88.6%). In the verification group,XGBoost had the highest AUC (0.764),accuracy (76.4%),accuracy (82.2%),specificity (70.5%) and F1 value (0.712),while DT had the lowest Brier score (0.21). Conclusion In the differentiation of AIP and PC,MRI can make a more accurate differential diagnosis from the signs and signals of the two,but it is difficult to distinguish the superficial signs and signals. The imaging omics model can better reflect the difference between the two diseases,and it is more significant in the portal phase,which is helpful to improve the differential diagnosis effect of the two diseases.

Magnetic resonance imagingImaging omicsAutoimmune pancreatitisPancreatic cancerDifferential diagnosis

纪易斐、陈肖漪

展开 >

226000 江苏省南通大学附属医院消化内科

磁共振成像 影像组学 自身免疫性胰腺炎 胰腺癌 鉴别诊断

2024

中国实用医药
中国康复医学会

中国实用医药

影响因子:0.797
ISSN:1673-7555
年,卷(期):2024.19(21)