首页|瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者血流动力学及认知功能的影响

瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者血流动力学及认知功能的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者血流动力学及认知功能的影响.方法 42例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者,以随机数字表法为分组原则将其分为对照组及观察组,每组21例.对照组接受芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉,观察组接受瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉.比较两组患者麻醉后恢复情况,血流动力学[平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、舒张压(DBP)、收缩压(SBP)],认知功能[警觉镇静评分量表(OAAS)、简易精神状态量表(MMSE)评分],并发症发生情况.结果 观察组拔管时间、苏醒时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、定向力恢复时间分别为(9.87±1.75)、(8.12±0.94)、(5.24±1.11)、(15.43±2.82)min,比对照组的(13.23±1.86)、(10.36±1.23)、(7.35±1.42)、(21.64±3.46)min更短,统计学差异显著(P<0.05).对照组麻醉后0.5 h的HR、DBP、SBP水平低于本组麻醉前0.5 h,MAP水平高于本组麻醉前0.5 h,统计学差异显著(P<0.05).观察组麻醉后0.5 h的HR、DBP、SBP、MAP水平与麻醉前0.5 h比较,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05);但观察组HR(95.76±2.26)次/min、DBP(75.58±3.47)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)、SBP(134.33±4.85)mm Hg高于对照组的(89.32±2.48)次/min、(72.19±3.54)mm Hg、(113.77±4.45)mm Hg,MAP(67.67±5.28)mm Hg低于对照组的(71.53±5.64)mm Hg,统计学差异显著(P<0.05).对照组、观察组拔管后24 h的OAAS评分分别为(4.22±0.62)、(4.33±0.65)分,均高于本组拔管时的(3.23±0.56)、(3.24±0.57)分,统计学差异显著(P<0.05),但组间比较,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05).两组拔管后24 h的MMSE评分均高于本组拔管时,且观察组MMSE评分(28.47±1.13)分高于对照组的(26.54±1.76)分,统计学差异显著(P<0.05).两组患者并发症发生率比较,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉可以有效稳定腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者血流动力学,促进麻醉后机体及认知功能恢复.
Effect of anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol on hemodynamics and cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Objective To explore the effect of anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol on hemodynamics and cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A total of 42 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into a control group and an observation group based on the random number table method,each consisting of 21 patients. The control group received anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol,while the observation group received anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. Patients in both groups were compared in terms of recovery status after anesthesia,hemodynamics[mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate (HR),diastolic blood pressure (DBP),systolic blood pressure (SBP)],cognitive function[observer's assessment of the alertness/sedation scale (OAAS),Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)]and complications. Results The extubation time,recovery time,recovery time of spontaneous respiration and recovery time of directional force were (9.87±1.75),(8.12±0.94),(5.24±1.11) and (15.43±2.82) min in the observation group,which were shorter than (13.23±1.86),(10.36±1.23),(7.35±1.42) and (21.64±3.46) min in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the control group,the levels of HR,DBP and SBP at 0.5 h after anesthesia were lower than those at 0.5 h before anesthesia in this group,and the level of MAP was higher than that at 0.5 h before anesthesia in this group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In the observation group,the levels of HR,DBP,SBP and MAP at 0.5 h after anesthesia were not statistically significant when compared with those at 0.5 h before anesthesia (P>0.05). However,the observation group had HR of (95.76±2.26) beats/min,DBP of (75.58±3.47) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa),and SBP of (134.33±4.85) mm Hg,which were higher than (89.32±2.48) beats/min,(72.19±3.54) mm Hg,and (113.77±4.45) mm Hg in the control group;and MAP of (67.67±5.28) mm Hg in the observation group was lower than (71.53±5.64) mm Hg in the control group;the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The OAAS scores of the control group and the observation group at 24 h after extubation were (4.22±0.62) and (4.33±0.65) points,which were higher than (3.23±0.56) and (3.24±0.57) points in this group at the time of extubation,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05),but the differences were not statistically significant when comparing between the two groups (P>0.05). The MMSE scores in both groups at 24 h after extubation were higher than those at the time of extubation in this group,and the MMSE score of (28.47±1.13) points in the observation group was higher than (26.54±1.76) points in the control group. The differences were not statistically significant (P<0.05). Comparison of complication rates between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol can effectively stabilize the hemodynamics of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and promote the recovery of body and cognitive function after anesthesia.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomyRemifentanilPropofolHemodynamicsCognitive functionAnesthesia

张娜娜

展开 >

223200 淮安市楚州中医院麻醉科

腹腔镜胆囊切除术 瑞芬太尼 丙泊酚 血流动力学 认知功能 麻醉

2024

中国实用医药
中国康复医学会

中国实用医药

影响因子:0.797
ISSN:1673-7555
年,卷(期):2024.19(21)