首页|匹伐他汀钙与阿托伐他汀钙在冠心病临床治疗中的疗效及安全性对比

匹伐他汀钙与阿托伐他汀钙在冠心病临床治疗中的疗效及安全性对比

扫码查看
目的 研究并对比匹伐他汀钙与阿托伐他汀钙在冠心病临床治疗中的疗效及安全性.方法 80 例冠心病患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组,每组 40 例.对照组应用阿托伐他汀钙治疗,研究组应用匹伐他汀钙治疗.比较两组患者治疗效果、不良反应发生情况、血脂指标(总胆固醇、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇)、心肌损伤指标(肌钙蛋白I、肌酸激酶同工酶、乳酸脱氢酶)、血液流变学指标(全血高切粘度、全血低切粘度、血浆粘度、红细胞压积)、生活质量评分.结果 研究组治疗总有效率 97.50%比对照组的 82.50%高(P<0.05).两组不良反应发生率对比差异不明显(P>0.05).治疗后,两组患者总胆固醇、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇比治疗前低,且研究组总胆固醇(4.37±0.74)mmol/L、甘油三酯(1.22±0.33)mmol/L、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(2.96±0.37)mmol/L均比对照组的(5.24±0.87)、(1.61±0.40)、(3.35±0.39)mmol/L低(P<0.05).治疗后,两组肌钙蛋白I、肌酸激酶同工酶、乳酸脱氢酶均比治疗前低,且研究组肌钙蛋白I(0.08±0.02)μg/L、肌酸激酶同工酶(16.20±2.39)U/L、乳酸脱氢酶(235.59±10.62)U/L均比对照组的(0.15±0.01)μg/L、(23.39±2.94)U/L、(250.16±12.45)U/L低(P<0.05).治疗后,两组全血高切粘度、全血低切粘度、血浆粘度、红细胞压积均比治疗前低,且研究组全血高切粘度(4.50±0.43)mPa·s、全血低切粘度(10.75±0.69)mPa·s、血浆粘度(1.68±0.31)mPa·s、红细胞压积(33.27±2.08)%均比对照组的(5.01±0.49)mPa·s、(11.60±0.73)mPa·s、(2.07±0.35)mPa·s、(35.59±2.04)%低(P<0.05).治疗后,两组生理、心理、环境、社会关系评分均比治疗前高,且研究组生理评分(89.75±6.48)分、心理评分(89.07±6.02)分、环境评分(90.14±6.15)分、社会关系评分(89.96±6.27)分均比对照组的(82.93±6.85)、(82.40±6.13)、(83.27±6.30)、(83.14±6.54)分高(P<0.05).结论 在冠心病患者治疗时,采用匹伐他汀钙治疗的效果优于阿托伐他汀钙,匹伐他汀钙可更加有效地改善患者体内脂代谢和血液流变学,减轻心肌损伤,有利于提升其生活质量水平,且匹伐他汀钙与阿托伐他汀钙的不良反应发生风险相当,具有良好的用药安全性.
Comparison on efficacy and safety of pitavastatin calcium and atorvastatin calcium in the clinical treatment of coronary heart disease
Objective To study and compare the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin calcium and atorvastatin calcium in the clinical treatment of coronary heart disease.Methods 80 patients with coronary heart disease were divided into a control group and a study group according to random numerical table,with 40 patients in each group.The control group was treated with atorvastatin calcium,while the study group was treated with pitavastatin calcium.Comparison was made on the treatment effect,occurrence of adverse reactions,blood lipid indicators(total cholesterol,triglyceride,low-density lipoprotein cholesterol),myocardial injury indicators(troponin I,creatine kinase isoenzyme,lactate dehydrogenase),hemorheological indicators(whole-blood high-shear viscosity,whole-blood low-shear viscosity,plasma viscosity,hematocrit),and quality of life scores between and within the two groups.Results The total effective rate of 97.50%in the study group was higher than 82.50%in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the total cholesterol,triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both groups were lower than those before treatment;in the study group,the total cholesterol was(4.37±0.74)mmol/L,the triglyceride was(1.22±0.33)mmol/L,the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was(2.96±0.37)mmol/L,which were lower than(5.24±0.87),(1.61±0.40)and(3.35±0.39)mmol/L in the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the troponin I,creatine kinase isoenzyme and lactate dehydrogenase in both groups were lower than those before treatment;in the study group,the troponin I was(0.08±0.02)μg/L,the creatine kinase isoenzyme was(16.20±2.39)U/L,and the lactate dehydrogenase was(235.59±10.62)U/L,which were lower than(0.15±0.01)μg/L,(23.39±2.94)U/L,and(250.16±12.45)U/L in the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the whole-blood high-shear viscosity,whole-blood low-shear viscosity,plasma viscosity,and hematocrit in both groups were lower than those before treatment;in the study group,the whole-blood high-shear viscosity was(4.50±0.43)mPa·s,the whole-blood low-shear viscosity was(10.75±0.69)mPa·s,the plasma viscosity was(1.68±0.31)mPa·s,and the hematocrit was(33.27±2.08)%,which were all lower than(5.01±0.49)mPa·s,(11.60±0.73)mPa·s,(2.07±0.35)mPa·s,and(35.59±2.04)%in the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the scores of physiology,psychology,environment and social relations in both groups were higher than those before treatment;the scores of physiology,psychology,environment and social relations were(89.75±6.48),(89.07±6.02),(90.14±6.15),and(89.96±6.27)points in the study group,which were higher than(82.93±6.85),(82.40±6.13),(83.27±6.30),and(83.14±6.54)points in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion For patients with coronary heart disease,the effect of pitavastatin calcium is superior to atorvastatin calcium.Pitavastatin calcium can more effectively improve the patient's lipid metabolism and hemorheology,reduce myocardial damage,and is beneficial for improving their quality of life.Moreover,the risk of adverse reactions between pitavastatin calcium and atorvastatin calcium is comparable,so it has good drug safety.

Coronary heart diseaseAtorvastatin calciumPitavastatin calciumBlood lipidMyocardial damageEfficacySafety

李敬品

展开 >

277101 山东省国欣颐养集团枣庄医院

冠心病 阿托伐他汀钙 匹伐他汀钙 血脂 心肌损伤 疗效 安全性

2024

中国实用医药
中国康复医学会

中国实用医药

影响因子:0.797
ISSN:1673-7555
年,卷(期):2024.19(22)