首页|单孔与单操作孔胸腔镜肺结节切除术后并发症的对比研究

单孔与单操作孔胸腔镜肺结节切除术后并发症的对比研究

扫码查看
目的 对比单孔与单操作孔胸腔镜肺结节切除术对术后并发症的影响,探讨两种不同术式在胸腔镜下肺结节切除术中的临床应用价值.方法 选取肺结节疾病患者 223 例作为研究对象,根据手术方式不同分为对照组(113例)和观察组(110例).对照组患者予以单操作孔胸腔镜肺结节切除术治疗,观察组患者予以单孔胸腔镜肺结节切除术治疗.对比两组患者的手术情况(手术时间、术中出血量)、恢复情况[术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后胸腔引流量、胸腔引流时间、住院时间]、术后并发症发生情况.结果 观察组患者的手术时间为(92.31±12.25)min、术中出血量为(49.17±2.8)ml,对照组分别为(89.33±10.57)min、(49.10±1.58)ml.两组患者的手术时间及术中出血量对比,无显著差异(P>0.05).观察组患者的术后胸腔引流量为(651.33±52.57)ml,少于对照组的(781.31±32.25)ml(P<0.05);观察组患者的胸腔引流时间为(2.81±0.13)d,住院时间为(4.82±0.27)d,短于对照组的(3.95±0.24)、(6.13±0.15)d(P<0.05);观察组患者的术后VAS评分为(3.01±0.25)分,低于对照组的(4.88±0.17)分(P<0.05).观察组并发症发生率为 11.82%,明显低于对照组的 30.09%(P<0.05).结论 单孔胸腔镜肺结节切除术术后胸腔引流量、胸腔引流时间和并发症发生率等方面相对优于单操作孔胸腔镜肺结节切除术,为选择合适的手术方法和预防术后并发症提供重要参考.
Comparative study of complications after uniportal and single utility port thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules
Objective To compare the effect of uniportal and single utility port thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules on postoperative complications,and explore the clinical value of two procedures in thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules.Methods A total of 223 patients with pulmonary nodules were selected as the study subjects and divided into a control group(113 cases)and an observation group(110 cases)according to different procedures.The control group was treated with single utility port thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules,and the observation group was treated with uniportal thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules.The operation status(operation time,intraoperative blood loss),recovery status[postoperative visual analogue scale(VAS)score,chest drainage postoperatively,duration of chest drainage,hospitalization time]and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the observation group were(92.31±12.25)min and(49.17±2.8)ml,while those of the control group were(89.33±10.57)min and(49.10±1.58)ml.There were no significant differences in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).The chest drainage postoperatively was(651.33±52.57)ml in the observation group,which was shorter than(781.31±32.25)ml in the control group(P<0.05).The duration of chest drainage of the observation group was(2.81±0.13)d,and the hospitalization time was(4.82±0.27)d,which were shorter than(3.95±0.24)and(6.13±0.15)d of the control group(P<0.05).The postoperative VAS score of(3.01±0.25)points in the observation group was lower than(4.88±0.17)points in the control group(P<0.05).The complication rate in the observation group was 11.82%,which was significantly lower than 30.09%in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Uniportal thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules is superior to single utility port thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules in terms of chest drainage,duration of chest drainage and incidence of chest pain,which provides an important reference for choosing the appropriate surgical method and preventing postoperative complications.

ThoracoscopePulmonary nodulesUniportalSingle utility portComplications

王峻峰、陈淑章、胡硕、郑世营

展开 >

215124 苏州广慈肿瘤医院胸外科

胸腔镜 肺结节 单孔 单操作孔 并发症

2024

中国实用医药
中国康复医学会

中国实用医药

影响因子:0.797
ISSN:1673-7555
年,卷(期):2024.19(22)