首页|两种水土流失预测方法的比较分析——以浙江省嘉善县绿谷片防洪排涝口门控制一期工程为例

两种水土流失预测方法的比较分析——以浙江省嘉善县绿谷片防洪排涝口门控制一期工程为例

扫码查看
准确预测水土流失量是编制水土保持方案的关键环节,直接影响水土流失防治措施与监测方法的选择和实施.以浙江省嘉善县绿谷片防洪排涝口门控制一期工程为例,采用SL 773-2018《生产建设项目土壤流失量测算导则》(简称《导则》)和类比分析法对工程水土流失量进行预测,并对比分析了2种方法的预测结果.结果表明,新建(构)筑物区和临时堆土区是该项目水土流失的主要区域,大部分的水土流失发生在施工期;2种方法预测结果接近,《导则》相对于类比分析法的预测相对误差小于 25%,《导则》预测结果偏保守,但精度整体可控,可以较好地运用于水利类点状工程.
Comparative Analysis of Two Methods for Predicting Soil Erosion:Taking the First Phase of the Flood Control&Drainage Gate Control Project in the Green Valley Area of Jiashan,Zhejiang as an Example
Accurate prediction of soil erosion is a key step in preparing soil and water conservation plans,which directly affects the selection and implementation of soil erosion prevention measures and monitoring methods.Taking the first phase of the flood control and drainage outlet control project in the Green Valley area of Jiashan,Zhejiang as an example,it predicts the amount of soil erosion in the project using SL 773-2018 Guidelines for Calculating Soil Erosion Losses in Production and Construction Projects(referred to as Guidelines)and analogical analysis method,and compares the prediction results of the two methods.The results show that the new(structural)building area and temporary soil stacking area are the main areas of soil erosion in the project,and most of the soil erosion occurs during the construction period.The prediction results of the two methods are close,and the relative error of the Guidelines is less than 25%compared to the analogical analysis method.The prediction results of the Guidelines are relatively conservative,but the accuracy is generally controllable,which can be well applied to water conservancy point-like projects.

soil erosion predictionGuidelinesanalogy analysis methodpoint-like engineering

刘涛

展开 >

上海市城市建设设计研究总院(集团)有限公司,上海 200125

水土流失预测 《导则》 类比分析法 点状工程

2024

中国市政工程
上海市城市建设设计研究院

中国市政工程

影响因子:0.358
ISSN:1004-4655
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 3