首页|单边双通道内镜与Delta大通道内镜技术治疗L5/S1椎间盘突出并椎管狭窄的临床疗效分析

单边双通道内镜与Delta大通道内镜技术治疗L5/S1椎间盘突出并椎管狭窄的临床疗效分析

Unilateral biportal endoscopy and Delta large portal technique for lumbar disc herniation with spinal stenosis

扫码查看
目的 探讨Delta大通道内镜技术与单边双通道内镜技术(unilateral biportal endoscopy,UBE)治疗L5/S1单节段椎间盘突出并椎管狭窄的疗效.方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年8月手术治疗的60例L5/S1单节段腰椎间盘突出并椎管狭窄患者的临床资料,其中32例采用Delta大通道内镜技术行经皮椎板间入路内镜下椎间盘切除术(Delta内镜组),28例采用UBE内镜技术行椎管减压髓核摘除术(UBE组).比较两组围手术期指标、腰腿痛VAS评分、ODI及并发症情况,末次随访时按Macnab标准评价疗效.结果 两组患者均顺利完成手术.Delta内镜组术中出血量少于UBE组,手术时间、住院时间短于UBE组(P<0.001).两组患者术后腰腿痛VAS评分及ODI均较术前明显降低,且Delta内镜组术后3 d腰痛VAS评分及术后1月腿痛VAS评分均低于UBE组(P<0.05).术后随访6个月,末次随访按Macnab标准评价疗效:Delta内镜组优30例,可2例,优良率为93.75%;UBE组优27例,可1例,优良率为96.43%;组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).Delta内镜组硬膜撕裂1例,因撕裂处较小仅严密缝合手术切口;UBE组出现腿部疼痛加重1例.结论 Delta大通道内镜技术与UBE治疗L5/S1单节段椎间盘突出并椎管狭窄均可获得良好的近期效果,但Delta内镜手术术中出血少,软组织损伤小,操作时间短,术后短期疼痛缓解明显,患者恢复快,而UBE适应证范围相对广泛.
Objective To explore the effect of Delta large channel endoscopic technique and unilateral biportal endoscopy(UBE)in the treatment of L5/S1 single lumbar disc herniation(sLDH)with spinal stenosis.Methods The clinical data of 60 sLDH patients combined with spinal stenosis admitted from January 2018 to August 2022 were analyzed retrospectively.The surgery of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy(PEID)was performed with Delta large channel endoscopic technique in 32 cases(as Delta group),and spinal decompression and intervertebral discectomy was performed with UBE in 28 cases(as UBE group).Perioperative indicators,compli-cations,visual analog scale(VAS)and Oswestry disability index(ODI)were compared between the two groups,and the efficacy was evaluated by Macnab criteria at the last follow-up.Results All surgical interventions accomplished successfully in both groups.Compared with the UBE group,the intra-operative bleeding volume was less,and the operation time and hospital stays were shorter in the Delta group,with statistical difference between the two groups(P<0.001).The VAS score and ODI was reduced in both groups after the surgery than those before the surgery,and the VAS score was lower in low back pain 3 days after the surgery and leg pain 1 month after the surgery in the Delta group than those in the UBE group(P<0.05).All cases were followed up for six months.According to Macnab criteria,the outcomes showed that excellence in 30 cases,fair in 2 cases,and the fineness rate was 93.75%in the Delta group,and excellence in 27 cases,fair in 1 case,and the fineness was 96.43%in the UBE group,and there was no statistical difference between them(P>0.05).Dural tear was found in one case of the Delta group,and leg pain was worse in one case of the UBE group after surgery.Conclusions Both UBE and Delta large channel endoscopic technique can achieve ideal short-term effect for sLDH with spinal stenosis.However,Delta endoscopy revealed less blood loss,mini-trauma of soft tissue,short operating time,obviously pain relief of short-term after surgery and fast recovery for patients,and the indications of UBE would be relatively wide.

lumbar disc herniationspinal canal stenosisDelta large portal endoscopyunilateral biportal endoscopy(UBE)

唐晓栋、张建文、李昭成、赵庆、齐兵献、雍清锋

展开 >

甘肃省中医院脊柱骨一科,兰州 730050

兰州中医骨伤科医院骨一科,兰州 730010

椎间盘突出 椎管狭窄 Delta大通道内镜手术 单边双通道内镜手术

2024

中国现代手术学杂志
中南大学湘雅二医院

中国现代手术学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.652
ISSN:1009-2188
年,卷(期):2024.28(1)
  • 33