首页|经桡动脉入路行血管内介入治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的临床效果

经桡动脉入路行血管内介入治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的临床效果

Clinical effect of endovascular intervention via transradial approach for acute ischemic stroke

扫码查看
目的 探讨经桡动脉入路(transradial approach,TRA)行血管内介入治疗急性缺血性脑卒中(acute ischemic stroke,AIS)的临床效果及安全性.方法 回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年1月我院行接触性动脉内溶栓治疗的113例AIS患者,按手术入路分为研究组(57例)及对照组(56例),分别经TRA入路和股动脉入路(transfemoral access,TFA)行血管内介入治疗.比较两组患者手术指标、血流变学指标、临床疗效以及并发症情况.结果 两组患者均顺利完成手术.研究组与对照组穿刺成功率分别为100%和96.64%.两组穿刺时间、到达病变血管时间、手术时间、穿刺成功率及血管再通率比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05).两组术后血流变学指标(高切黏度、低切黏度及血浆比黏度)均较术前明显下降(P<0.05),而治疗前、后两组血流变学指标比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05).术后6个月采用NIHSS评分评价临床疗效:研究组显效30例,有效22例,无效5例;对照组显效29例,有效20例,无效7例;两组临床总有效率比较无统计学差异(91.23%vs.87.50%,P>0.05).研究组术中发生桡动脉痉挛1例,术后前臂血肿及颅内出血各1例,均未发生穿刺局部出血;对照组发生穿刺局部出血10例,颅内出血2例;两组并发症发生率比较有统计学差异(5.26%vs.21.43%,P<0.05).结论 经TRA入路行血管内介入治疗可获得与TFA入路相近的临床效果,安全性较好,可有效减少并发症;对于具有适应证的AIS患者,可以优先考虑选择TRA入路行血管内介入手术.
Objective To discuss the efficacy and safety of endovascular intervention via transradial approach(TRA)in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke(AIS).Methods A total of 113 AIS patients un-derwent intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy from January 2021 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the surgical approaches,all patients were divided into the study group(n=57)and the control group(n=56),and received endovascular intervention via TRA and via transfemoral approach(TFA)respec-tively.The perioperative indexes,hemorheology indexes,clinical efficacy,and complications were compared between the two groups.Results All operations were accomplished successfully.The success rate of puncture was 100%and 96.64%in the study group and control group respectively,but there was no significant difference in the puncture time,time to reach the occluded vessel,operation time,success rate of puncture and vascular recanalization rate between the two groups(P>0.05).The hemorheology indexes(high shear viscosity,low shear viscosity and plasma specific viscosity)were significantly lower in both groups after operation than those before operation(P<0.05),however,no statistical difference was observed between the two groups,both preoperatively and postoperatively(P>0.05).According to NIHSS score,the clinical efficacy revealed that significant improvement in 30 cases,improvement in 22 cases,and failure in 5 cases in the study group,and significant improvement in 29 cases,improvement in 20 cases,and failure in 7 cases in the control group 6 months after the operation,and there was no significant difference in the total clinical effective rate between the two groups(91.23%vs.87.50%,P>0.05).The radial artery spasm occurred in 1 case during the surgery,and forearm hematoma and intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1 case respectively after the surgery in the study group without bleeding of puncture site,while puncture site bleeding was found in 10 cases,and intracranial hemorrhage was in 2 cases in the control group,and a statistical difference was observed in com-plication rate between the two groups(5.26%vs.21.43%,P<0.05).Conclusions The endovascular intervention via TRA is safe for AIS,and it can achieve a similar clinical efficacy as TFA,and effectively reduce the incidence of complications.TRA can be preferred for the AIS patients with the indications.

acute ischemic stroketransradial approachtransfemoral approachintra-arterial thrombolytic therapyendovascular interventional therapy

刘全亮、孙学瑞、董春蕊、吴婧

展开 >

沧州市人民医院神经内科,河北沧州 061000

急性缺血性脑卒中 经桡动脉入路 经股动脉入路 动脉内接触性溶栓 血管内介入治疗

2024

中国现代手术学杂志
中南大学湘雅二医院

中国现代手术学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.652
ISSN:1009-2188
年,卷(期):2024.28(5)