首页|改良Borsellino术与Devine术治疗小儿隐匿性阴茎的临床疗效比较

改良Borsellino术与Devine术治疗小儿隐匿性阴茎的临床疗效比较

Effect comparison of modified Borsellino procedure and modified Devine procedure for concealed penis in children

扫码查看
目的 比较改良Borsellino术与改良Devine术治疗儿童隐匿性阴茎的临床效果.方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2024年2月扬州大学附属医院小儿外科收治的96例隐匿性阴茎患儿的临床资料.其中,以2021年1月至2024年2月收治的52例患儿为观察组,年龄(7.83±3.13)岁,BMI(19.11±3.34)kg/m2,术前阴茎长度为(14.55±1.86)mm,行阴囊"V"形切口辅助脱套固定的改良Borsellino术;以2018年1月至2020年12月收治的44例患儿为对照组,年龄(8.01±3.32)岁,BMI(18.92±3.53)kg/m2,术前阴茎长度(14.72±2.88)mm,均行包皮狭窄环切除、阴茎脱套、阴茎根部两点法固定的改良Devine术.比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、阴茎长度、术后阴茎延长长度、并发症等.结果 两组患儿术后阴茎长度均较术前明显改善(P<0.001);观察组术后阴茎长度和延长长度优于对照组[(46.43±3.80)mm vs.(40.11±4.60)mm,(31.73±3.02)mm vs.(26.19±4.32)mm],手术时间长于对照组[(85.76±26.81)min vs.(56.63±12.52)min],均有统计学差异(P<0.05),而两组术中出血量比较无统计学差异(P>0.05).两组患儿均无阴茎背侧血管、神经及阴茎腹侧尿道损伤.术后随访3~6个月.观察组术后并发症5例,其中切口感染3例(5.77%),包皮水肿1例(1.92%),皮下血肿1例(1.92%),无一例发生阴茎回缩;对照组术后并发症12例,其中包皮水肿5例(11.36%),阴茎回缩4例(9.09%),切口感染2例(4.54%),皮下血肿1例(2.27%);组间比较,对照组包皮水肿率及阴茎回缩率均高于观察组(P<0.05).结论 改良Borsellino术和改良Devine术矫正儿童隐匿性阴茎均为安全有效的手术方法.改良Devine术操作相对简单,但改良Borsellino术阴茎延长效果更佳,阴茎回缩率低,可根据患儿具体情况选择合适的手术方式.
Objective To compare the surgical efficacy of the modified Borsellino procedure and modi-fied Devine procedure for correction of concealed penis in children.Methods The clinical data of 96 children with concealed penis admitted from January 2018 to February 2024 in the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou Univer-sity were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,52 cases as the observation group,aged(7.83±3.13)years,with BMI of(19.11±3.34)kg/m2 and penis length of(14.55±1.86)mm preoperatively,admitted from January 2021 to February 2024 were conducted the modified Borsellino procedure with the assistance of a V-shaped incision for detachment and fixation.A total of 44 children as the control group,aged(8.01±3.32)years,with BMI of(18.92±3.53)kg/m2 and penis length of(14.72±2.88)mm preoperatively,admitted from January 2018 to December 2020 were conducted the modified Devine procedure involving resec-tion of the narrowed frenulum,detachment of the penile sheath,and two-point fixation at the penile root.The perioperative indexes of operation time,intraoperative blood loss volume,penile length,penile elongation length and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results Compared to preoper-atively,the penis length was significantly improved in both groups postoperatively(P<0.001).Compared to the control group,both the lengths of penis and penile elongation were greater[(46.43±3.80)mm vs.(40.11±4.60)mm,(31.73±3.02)mm vs.(26.19±4.32)mm],but the operation time was longer[(85.76±26.81)min vs.(56.63±12.52)min]in the observation group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no injury of dorsal penile vessels and nerves,and urethral injury of ventral penis in both groups.All children were followed up for 3 to 6 months.Postoperative complication was found in 5 cases of the observation group,including 3(5.77%)of incision infection,1(1.92%)of foreskin edema,and 1(1.92%)of subcu-taneous hematoma,without penile retraction,and was in 12 cases of the control group,including 5(11.36%)of foreskin edema,4(9.09%)of penile retraction,2(4.54%)of incision infection,and 1(2.27%)of subcutaneous hematoma.Both incidences of foreskin edema and penile retraction were higher in the control group than those in the observation group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Both the modified Borsellino operation and the modified Devine operation are safe and effective for the correction of concealed penis in children.The modified Devine operation is relatively simple to conduct,while the modified Borsellino operation can achieve a better penile elongation effect and a lower penile retraction incidence.The appropriate surgical procedure can be selected according to the individual situation.

concealed penismodified Borsellino proceduremodified Devine procedure

朱世春、刘振勇

展开 >

扬州大学附属医院小儿外科,江苏扬州 225000

隐匿性阴茎 改良Borsellino术 改良Devine术

2024

中国现代手术学杂志
中南大学湘雅二医院

中国现代手术学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.652
ISSN:1009-2188
年,卷(期):2024.28(5)