首页|HFpEF患者ECHO检查特征及血清学相关指标变化与其NYHA分级的关系

HFpEF患者ECHO检查特征及血清学相关指标变化与其NYHA分级的关系

扫码查看
目的 探讨射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者超声心动图(ECHO)检查特征及血清学相关指标变化与其美国纽约心脏病学会(NYHA)分级的关系。方法 选取 120 例HFpEF患者作为HFpEF组,依据NYHA分级将HFpEF组患者分为Ⅱ级组(42 例)、Ⅲ级组(43 例)、Ⅳ级组(35 例);另选取同期 121 例健康体检的人员作为非心力衰竭组。检测并比较HFpEF组和非心力衰竭组ECHO指标[左室后壁厚度(LVPW)、室间隔厚度(IVS)、左心房内径(LAD)、左房容积指数(LAVI)、三尖瓣反流速度(TRV)、左室舒张末期内径(LVDd)、左室收缩末期内径(LVDs)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、二尖瓣舒张早期最大血流速度/舒张晚期最大血流速度(E/A)]及血清血尿酸(BUA)、N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平,比较HFpEF组不同NYHA分级患者血清BUA、NT-proBNP水平,分析HFpEF患者血清BUA、NT-proBNP水平与NYHA分级的相关性。结果 HFpEF组的LAD、LVDd、LVDs、E/A、LAVI、TRV分别为(45。37±5。95)mm、(49。75±5。72)mm、(33。72±3。84)mm、(0。74±0。11)、(45。52±5。53)ml/m2、(2。94±0。31)m/s,均高于非心力衰竭组的(32。82±4。85)mm、(41。51±5。28)mm、(26。16±3。43)mm、(0。52±0。09)、(20。64±3。41)ml/m2、(2。18±0。35)m/s,LVEF(61。24±7。86)%低于非心力衰竭组的(68。23±7。98)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);两组IVS、LVPW比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。HFpEF组血清BUA、NT-proBNP分别为(486。88±68。91)μmol/L、(874。07±112。71)pg/ml,均高于非心力衰竭组的(287。87±35。82)μmol/L、(121。57±16。26)pg/ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。Ⅱ级组血清BUA、NT-proBNP分别为(345。67±47。82)μmol/L、(613。63±72。45)pg/ml,Ⅲ级组血清BUA、NT-proBNP分别为(512。14±63。59)μmol/L、(863。46±94。84)pg/ml,Ⅳ级组血清BUA、NT-proBNP分别为(625。31±72。42)μmol/L、(1199。62±137。51)pg/ml。HFpEF组不同NYHA分级患者血清BUA、NT-proBNP水平比较差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);Ⅲ级组、Ⅳ级组患者血清BUA、NT-proBNP水平均高于Ⅱ级组,且Ⅳ级组高于Ⅲ级组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。经Pearson相关系数分析,HFpEF患者的血清BUA、NT-proBNP水平与NYHA分级呈正相关(r=0。476、0。474,P<0。05)。结论 ECHO指标异常能够对HFpEF进行辅助性判断,患者体内血清BUA、NT-proBNP水平越高可能意味着患者的NYHA分级越高,心功能受损情况越严重,临床可通过对患者血清BUA、NT-proBNP水平的检测辅助临床医师对HFpEF患者的病情以及心功能受损情况进行判断,从而尽早对患者实施针对性治疗,改善患者的预后。
Correlation of ECHO characteristics and serological indexes changes with NYHA classification in HFpEF patients
Objective To discuss the correlation of echocardiogram(ECHO)characteristics and serological indexes changes with New York Heart Association(NYHA)classification in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction(HFpEF)patients.Methods A total of 120 HFpEF patients were selected as HFpEF group.According to NYHA classification,the patients in HFpEF group were divided into class Ⅱ group(42 cases),classⅢ group(43 cases),and class Ⅳ group(35 cases).In addition,121 healthy subjects in the same period were selected as the non-heart failure group.ECHO parameters[left ventricular posterior wall thickness(LVPW),in-terventricular septum thickness(IVS),left atrial diameter(LAD),left atrial volume index(LAVI),tricuspid regurgitant velocity(TRV),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVDd),left ventricular end-systolic diameter(LVsD)and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)],ratio of mitral early flow velocity to mitral late flow velocity(E/A)],blood uric acid(BUA)and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP)levels were detected and compared between HFpEF group and non-heart failure group.Serum BUA and NT-proBNP levels of patients with different NYHA classification in HFpEF group were compared.The correlation of serum BUA,NT-proBNP levels with NYHA classification in HFpEF patients was analyzed.Results LAD,LVDd,LVDs,E/A,LAVI and TRV in HFpEF group were(45.37±5.95)mm,(49.75±5.72)mm,(33.72±3.84)mm,(0.74±0.11),(45.52±5.53)ml/m2 and(2.94±0.31)m/s,which were higher than those of(32.82±4.85)mm,(41.51±5.28)mm,(26.16±3.43)mm,(0.52±0.09),(20.64±3.41)ml/m2 and(2.18±0.35)m/s in non-heart failure group;LVEF of(61.24±7.86)%in HFpEF group was lower than that of(68.23±7.98)%in non-heart failure group;the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in IVS and LVPW between the two groups(P>0.05).The serum BUA and NT-proBNP in HFpEF group were(486.88±68.91)μmol/L and(874.07±112.71)pg/ml,respectively,which were higher than those of(287.87±35.82)μmol/L and(121.57±16.26)pg/ml in non-heart failure group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In classⅡ group,serum BUA and NT-proBNP were(345.67±47.82)μmol/L and(613.63±72.45)pg/ml,respectively.In class Ⅲ group,serum BUA and NT-proBNP were(512.14±63.59)μmol/L and(863.46±94.84)pg/ml,respectively.In class Ⅳ group,serum BUA and NT-proBNP were(625.31±72.42)μmol/L and(1199.62±137.51)pg/ml,respectively.The serum BUA and NT-proBNP levels of patients with different NYHA classification in HFpEF group were significantly different(P<0.05).The levels of serum BUA and NT-proBNP in class Ⅲand Ⅳ groups were higher than those in class Ⅱ group,and that in class Ⅳ group was higher than that in classⅢ group.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Pearson correlation coefficient analysis showed that serum BUA and NT-proBNP levels were positively correlated with NYHA classification in HFpEF patients(r=0.476,0.474;P<0.05).Conclusion Abnormal ECHO index can assist the judgment of HFpEF.The higher the level of serum BUA and NT-proBNP in the patient,the higher the NYHA classification of the patient,and the more serious the cardiac function impairment.Clinically,the detection of serum BUA and NT-proBNP levels can assist clinicians to judge the condition and cardiac function impairment of patients with HFpEF,so as to provide targeted treatment for patients as soon as possible and improve the prognosis of patients.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fractionEchocardiogramSerological indexesCardiac function classification

贺骞、黄婷

展开 >

334000 上饶市人民医院心内二科

334000 上饶市人民医院超声医学科

射血分数保留的心力衰竭 超声心动图 血清学相关指标 心脏功能分级

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(1)
  • 13