首页|自体髂骨和同种异体骨植入治疗SchatzkerⅡ型胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较

自体髂骨和同种异体骨植入治疗SchatzkerⅡ型胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 比较SchatzkerⅡ型胫骨平台骨折应用自体髂骨和同种异体骨植入治疗的临床疗效。方法 74例SchatzkerⅡ型胫骨平台骨折患者,按手术植骨治疗方法不同分为自体髂骨组和异体骨组,各37 例。两组均采用胫骨近端外侧锁定钢板内固定,自体髂骨组胫骨平台塌陷处植入自体髂骨,异体骨组胫骨平台塌陷处植入异体骨。比较两组手术相关指标,术后 3、6 个月的美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分及膝关节屈曲活动度,并发症发生情况。结果 自体髂骨组术中出血量(62。70±3。34)ml多于异体骨组的(44。50±3。03)ml,手术时间(86。50±5。87)min、骨折愈合时间(18。40±3。20)周长于异体骨组的(77。30±2。98)min、(14。80±2。29)周,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。两组术后 3、6 个月的HSS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。两组术后 3、6 个月的膝关节屈曲活动度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。异体骨组并发症发生率为 5。4%(2/37),与自体髂骨组的 8。1(3/37)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 同种异体骨较自体髂骨在骨折愈合时间、手术时间、出血量方面相对具有优势,但在术后膝关节功能、膝关节活动度方面效果相当,说明同种异体骨与自体髂骨植骨治疗schatkzerⅡ型胫骨平台骨折各有优势,可根据患者具体情况进行手术的选择。
Comparison of the efficacy of autogenous iliac bone and allograft bone implantation in the treatment of Schatzker type Ⅱ tibial plateau fracture
Objective To compare the clinic efficacy of autogenous iliac bone and allograft bone grafting in the treatment of Schatzker type Ⅱ tibial plateau fracture.Methods A total of 74 patients with Schatzker typeⅡ tibial plateau fracture were divided into autogenous iliac bone group and allograft bone group according to different surgical bone grafting methods,with 37 cases in each group.Internal fixation of the proximal lateral tibial locking plate was used in both groups,and autologous iliac bone was implanted at the collapsed tibial plateau in the autologous iliac bone group,and allograft bone was implanted at the collapsed tibial plateau in the allograft bone group.Both groups were compared for surgical related indicators,the score of Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)and knee flexion range of motion at 3 and 6 months after surgery,and the incidence of complications.Results The intraoperative blood loss of(62.70±3.34)ml in the autogenous iliac bone group was higher than that of(44.50±3.03)ml in the allograft bone group;the operative time of(86.50±5.87)min and the fracture healing time of(18.40±3.20)weeks in the autogenous iliac bone group were longer than those of(77.30±2.98)min and(14.80±2.29)weeks in allograft bone group;the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).At 3 and 6 months after surgery,there was no statistically significant difference in HSS scores between the two groups(P>0.05).At 3 and 6 months after surgery,there was no statistically significant difference in knee flexion range of motion between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of complications in the allograft bone group and autogenous iliac bone group were 5.4%(2/37)and 8.1%(3/37),and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Allograft bone has advantages over autogenous iliac bone in terms of fracture healing time,operative time,and blood loss,but it has similar effects on postoperative knee joint function and knee flexion range of motion,indicating that both allograft bone and autogenous iliac bone have advantages in the treatment of schatkzer type Ⅱ tibial plateau fracture,and surgery can be performed according to the specific conditions of patients.

Schatzker type Ⅱ tibial plateau fractureAutogenous iliac boneAllograft boneBone graftingLocking plate

庞涛、郭燕芬、陈纪宝

展开 >

271000 山东省泰安市第一人民医院骨一科

SchatzkerⅡ型胫骨平台骨折 自体髂骨 同种异体骨 植骨 锁定钢板

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(1)
  • 12