首页|右美托咪定镇静麻醉在急诊胫腓骨骨折手术中的应用效果观察

右美托咪定镇静麻醉在急诊胫腓骨骨折手术中的应用效果观察

扫码查看
目的 分析右美托咪定镇静麻醉在急诊胫腓骨骨折手术中的应用效果及安全性。方法 70 例急诊行胫腓骨骨折手术的患者,将其随机分为观察组及对照组,每组 35 例。观察组给予右美托咪定静脉镇静麻醉,对照组给予舒芬太尼联合硬膜外麻醉。比较两组患者不同时间(术后上泵即刻及术后 30 min、1 h、2 h、3 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、36 h、48 h)、状态(静息、运动状态)的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分;拔管后 5 min镇静评分;拔管时呛咳评分;不良反应发生状态情况。结果 观察组患者术后 30 min、1 h、2 h、3 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、36 h、48 h以及静息、运动状态的VAS评分分别为(5。26±1。12)、(5。00±0。73)、(5。49±1。15)、(5。74±1。52)、(7。26±0。85)、(5。23±0。84)、(4。29±0。83)、(4。00±0。73)、(2。51±0。51)、(2。23±0。43)、(2。77±0。84)分,均低于对照组的(6。71±1。32)、(6。29±0。83)、(5。97±0。71)、(6。46±0。85)、(8。03±0。71)、(6。49±0。51)、(4。80±1。08)、(4。51±0。51)、(3。26±0。44)、(3。03±0。71)、(3。54±1。12)分,差异具有显著性统计学意义(P<0。05)。观察组患者拔管后 5 min镇静评分(4。29±0。75)分、拔管时呛咳评分(2。37±0。97)分低于对照组的(4。91±0。70)、(2。83±0。79)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05)。观察组恶心、呕吐、瘙痒、呼吸抑制发生率分别为 2。5%、5。0%、7。5%、5。0%,均低于对照组的 37。5%、40。0%、30。0%、40。0%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 右美托咪定对于急诊胫腓骨骨折手术安全性高,不良反应少,值得临床推荐应用。
Observation on application effect of dexmedetomidine sedative anesthesia in emergency tibial and fibular fracture surgery
Objective To analyze the safety of dexmedetomidine sedative anesthesia in emergency tibial and fibular fracture surgery.Methods 70 patients undergoing emergency tibial and fibular fracture surgery were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group,with 35 patients in each group.The observation group received intravenous sedative anesthesia with dexmedetomidine,and the control group received epidural anesthesia with sufentanil.Comparison was made on the visual analogue scale(VAS)score at different time points(immediately,30 min,1 h,2 h,3 h,6 h,12 h,24 h,36 h,and 48 h after surgery)and different states(at rest and during activity),sedation scores at 5 min after extubation,cough score at extubation,and adverse reactions between the two groups.Results In the observation group,the VAS scores at 30 min,1 h,2 h,3 h,6 h,12 h,24 h,36 h,and 48 h after surgery,at rest and during activity were(5.26±1.12),(5.00±0.73),(5.49±1.15),(5.74±1.52),(7.26±0.85),(5.23±0.84),(4.29±0.83),(4.00±0.73),(2.51±0.51),(2.23±0.43),(2.77±0.84)points,which were lower than(6.71±1.32),(6.29±0.83),(5.97±0.71),(6.46±0.85),(8.03±0.71),(6.49±0.51),(4.80±1.08),(4.51±0.51),(3.26±0.44),(3.03±0.71),(3.54±1.12)points in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The sedation score at 5 min after extubation in the observation group was(4.29±0.75)points and the cough score at extubation was(2.37±0.97)points,which were lower than(4.91±0.70)and(2.83±0.79)points in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence rates of nausea,vomiting,itching and respiratory depression in the observation group were 2.5%,5.0%,7.5%and 5.0%,which were lower than 37.5%,40.0%,30.0%and 40.0%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine is highly safe and has less adverse reactions for emergency tibial and fibula fracture surgery,which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

DexmedetomidineSedative anesthesiaTibial and fibular fracture surgerySufentanil

全芬、谢宇成

展开 >

334000 上饶市人民医院麻醉学

334000 上饶市妇幼保健院麻醉学

右美托咪定 镇静麻醉 胫腓骨骨折手术 舒芬太尼

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(3)
  • 12