首页|腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞在腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的临床应用

腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞在腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的临床应用

扫码查看
目的 研究腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞在腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的临床应用效果。方法 70 例接受无张力疝修补手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为传统组以及新式组,各 35 例。传统组患者接受腰硬联合麻醉,新式组接受腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞。比较两组手术相关情况、疼痛情况、心率及平均动脉压、不良事件发生情况。结果 新式组患者的麻醉起效时间、手术时间、术后下地活动时间以及住院时间分别为(4。03±1。57)min、(44。05±10。05)min、(3。81±1。17)h、(3。35±1。33)d,均显著短于传统组的(6。14±2。70)min、(59。03±13。18)min、(5。77±1。44)h、(4。72±1。71)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。术后 30 min,新式组患者的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分(2。35±0。73)分显著低于传统组的(3。06±0。67)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。麻醉后 15、30 min,新式组患者的心率及平均动脉压均显著低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。新式组术后不良事件发生率为 2。86%,传统组为 20。00%;新式组患者术后不良反应发生率显著低于传统组(P<0。05)。结论 相对于传统的腰硬联合麻醉,腰硬联合麻醉加腰方肌阻滞的方式镇痛效果更好、安全性更高、术后恢复效果更佳,值得在临床上推广使用。
Clinical application of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia plus quadratus lumborum block in tension-free hernioplasty of inguinal hernia
Objective To study the clinical effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia plus quadratus lumborum block in tension-free hernioplasty of inguinal hernia.Methods A total of 70 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent tension-free hernioplasty were selected as the study subjects,and they were divided into traditional group and modern group,with 35 cases in each group.Patients in the traditional group received combined spinal and epidural anesthesia,and patients in the modern group received combined spinal and epidural anesthesia plus quadratus lumborum block.The surgery-related conditions,pain conditions,heart rate,mean arterial pressure,and occurrence of adverse events of the two groups were compared.Results The onset of anesthesia,operation time,postoperative ambulation time,and hospitalization time of the patients in the modern group were(4.03±1.57)min,(44.05±10.05)min,(3.81±1.17)h,and(3.35±1.33)d,which were significantly shorter than(6.14±2.70)min,(59.03±13.18)min,(5.77±1.44)h,and(4.72±1.71)d of the traditional group.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).At 30 min postoperatively,the visual analogue scale(VAS)score of patients in the modern group was(2.35±0.73)points,which was significantly lower than(3.06±0.67)points in the traditional group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).At 15 and 30 min after anesthesia,the heart rate and mean arterial pressure of patients in the modern group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence rate of postoperative adverse events in the modern group was 2.86%,and that in the traditional group was 20.00%;the incidence rate of postoperative adverse events in the modern group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional combined spinal and epidural anesthesia,the combined spinal and epidural anesthesia plus quadratus lumborum block has better analgesic effect,higher safety and better postoperative recovery effect,which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Inguinal herniaTension-free hernioplastyCombined spinal and epidural anesthesiaQuadratus lumborum block

吴慧娟

展开 >

226321 南通市通州区二甲中心卫生院

腹股沟疝 无张力疝修补术 腰硬联合麻醉 腰方肌阻滞

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(6)
  • 15