首页|达格列净治疗心力衰竭患者的临床效果探讨

达格列净治疗心力衰竭患者的临床效果探讨

扫码查看
目的 探讨达格列净在心力衰竭治疗中的应用效果。方法 72 例心力衰竭患者,采取随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,各 36 例。对照组采用常规治疗,观察组采用常规疗法的同时结合达格列净治疗。对比两组治疗效果、心功能指标、炎性因子、B型钠尿肽(BNP)水平及 6 min步行距离、不良反应发生情况、生活质量评分。结果 观察组治疗总有效率 94。44%高于对照组的 75。00%(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室收缩末期内径(LVESD)未见明显差异(P>0。05);治疗后,观察组LVEDD(42。16±6。35)mm、LVEF(47。28±6。14)%、LVESD(29。63±6。67)mm优于对照组的(46。53±5。51)mm、(43。69±5。68)%、(34。15±5。58)mm(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)未见明显差异(P>0。05);治疗后,观察组CRP(4。29±0。57)mg/L、IL-6(11。24±1。05)ng/L低于对照组的(6。45±0。46)mg/L、(17。23±1。18)ng/L(P<0。05)。治疗前,观察组BNP及 6 min步行距离与对照组未见明显差异(P>0。05);治疗后,观察组BNP(246。89±87。94)pg/ml及 6 min步行距离(328。67±30。13)m优于对照组的(285。43±75。46)pg/ml、(281。67±29。65)m(P<0。05)。观察组与对照组不良反应发生率未见明显差异(P>0。05)。观察组物质生活、心理功能、躯体功能、社会功能评分分别为(74。18±7。72)、(75。26±7。74)、(73。24±8。26)、(67。53±7。15)分,高于对照组的(69。65±8。13)、(70。23±8。65)、(66。35±7。13)、(61。68±6。24)分(P<0。05)。结论 达格列净在心力衰竭治疗中应用效果明显,不仅可以改善患者心功能、炎性反应、生活质量,且不增加不良反应发生率,值得临床采纳、推广。
Investigation of the effect of dapagliflozin in the treatment of patients with heart failure
Objective To explore the effect of dapagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure.Methods 72 patients with heart failure were divided into a control group and an observation group by random number table method,with 36 cases in each group.The control group was treated with conventional treatment,and the observation group was treated with conventional treatment and dapagliflozin.Both groups were compared in terms of therapeutic effect,cardiac function indicators,inflammatory factors,B-type natriuretic peptide(BNP)level,6-min walking distance,occurrence of adverse reactions,and quality of life score.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 94.44%,which was higher than 75.00%of the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)and left ventricular end-systolic diameter(LVESD)between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the observation group had LVEDD of(42.16±6.35)mm,LVEF of(47.28±6.14)%and LVESD of(29.63±6.67)mm,which were better than(46.53±5.51)mm,(43.69±5.68)%and(34.15±5.58)mm in the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference in C-reactive protein(CRP)and interleukin-6(IL-6)between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the observation group had CRP of(4.29±0.57)mg/L and IL-6 of(11.24±1.05)ng/L,which were lower than(6.45±0.46)mg/L and(17.23±1.18)ng/L in the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,the difference in BNP and 6-min walking distance between the observation group and the control group were small(P>0.05).After treatment,the observation group had BNP of(246.89±87.94)pg/ml and 6-min walking distance of(328.67±30.13)m,which were better than(285.43±75.46)pg/ml and(281.67±29.65)m in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05).The scores of material life,psychological function,physical function and social function in the observation group were(74.18±7.72),(75.26±7.74),(73.24±8.26)and(67.53±7.15)points,which were higher than(69.65±8.13),(70.23±8.65),(66.35±7.13)and(61.68±6.24)points in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of dapagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure is effective,which can not only improve the cardiac function,inflammatory response and quality of life of patients,without increase of adverse reactions,which is worthy of clinical adoption and promotion.

Heart failureDapagliflozinCardiac functionClinical effect

咸贺

展开 >

157011 牡丹江医科大学19级临床医学心内科

心力衰竭 达格列净 心功能 临床效果

2024

中国现代药物应用
中国水利电力医学科学技术学会

中国现代药物应用

影响因子:0.862
ISSN:1673-9523
年,卷(期):2024.18(7)
  • 20